- Joined
- Jan 9, 2003
- Location
- California
I've browsed through the forums on the MBM site and I have some questions for our smart oc forumers:
Which temperature reading is more accurate, on-die or in-socket? And just to clarify, in socket is underneath the cpu and on-die is on the cpu itself, right?
Someone on the MBM forum suggested that LM90 Remote is on-die and LM90 Local is in-socket, but that should mean that the LM90Local sensor should be a little cooler than the remote sensors and also react more slowly, right?
Right now as I'm burning in, i have readings of 36 for CPU (LM90remote), 28 for system, and 38 for CPU (insocket, LM90local)... which is confusing because shouldn't the in-socket reading report cooler than the on-die?
Which temperature reading is more accurate, on-die or in-socket? And just to clarify, in socket is underneath the cpu and on-die is on the cpu itself, right?
Someone on the MBM forum suggested that LM90 Remote is on-die and LM90 Local is in-socket, but that should mean that the LM90Local sensor should be a little cooler than the remote sensors and also react more slowly, right?
Right now as I'm burning in, i have readings of 36 for CPU (LM90remote), 28 for system, and 38 for CPU (insocket, LM90local)... which is confusing because shouldn't the in-socket reading report cooler than the on-die?