- Joined
- Sep 28, 2002
- Location
- Juneau Alaska
I am sitting here, talking to my friend, and and here we are wondering who's videocard is faster.
we both have XP 2100's.
epox 8rdas, and Nvidia videocards.
mine is a Ti 4200 64 meg card.
his is a ti4400.
I want to see which one is faster, when at the same speed, default speed of 1.73 and straight same cas latency and everything else, with no overclocks on the videocards at all.
just a straight across test.
now, he's sitting here giving me this thing about "I would need to plu my computer into the same power supply your on, if I was gonna do this"
now heres, why he says this.
he is here from portland.
so obviously he is here in seattle at my place.
well trying to benchmark with his computer, as some speed he previously did successful overclocked benchmarks, he has failed here.
but then again, he barely gave it any time to try it.
so he's saying that his computer is now running alot hotter cause of the plugs in my place.
fine, thats a possible thing.
but not at default.
if the computer is at default, I see no reason why the power plug in the wall, will make his computer unstable.
none at all.
overclocked?
sure maybe, since it needs more voltages and such.
but not when the computer is at default.
I can't imagine how this can possibly make him lose 1000 points on 3dmark, cause thats what he thinks is gonna happen.
he's saying he loses 1000 points, cause of the plugs in my wall.
nothing else.
now, I know there can be bad plugs and such, making it unstable for some reason, but that would have to be a truely bad plug in, to vary the amps on a PC by all that much, plus, I thought a Computers PSU would control the amount of amps reaching the motherboard, CPU and such, again negating his "I lose 1000 points, just by your Power supplyu Plug ins" arguement.
this annoys me, cause I can see it a slightly possible thing under highly overclocked conditions, but not something so drastic as losing 1000 points, just ause he benchmarked here at my place instead of in portland.
otherwise, I think PSU's would have a much larger role in overclocking then they really do.
we all know it's best to have a PSU that gets 12+ on the 12 volt line and such, but to say "I lose 1000 points" just cause of a plug in, is a damn thin excuse for me to believe.
othersie I assume power supplys and wall plug ins would play a much larger role in the general knowlege around overclockers wouldn't it?
anyone here, help me with this?
some sort of proof, cause it seems no matter what I tell him, he's gonna try and relate it to his old experience with RC cars, and then tell me this or that.
I just don't see, a plug in, as making that much of a difference.
I can be wrong, but I just can't see it...
we both have XP 2100's.
epox 8rdas, and Nvidia videocards.
mine is a Ti 4200 64 meg card.
his is a ti4400.
I want to see which one is faster, when at the same speed, default speed of 1.73 and straight same cas latency and everything else, with no overclocks on the videocards at all.
just a straight across test.
now, he's sitting here giving me this thing about "I would need to plu my computer into the same power supply your on, if I was gonna do this"
now heres, why he says this.
he is here from portland.
so obviously he is here in seattle at my place.
well trying to benchmark with his computer, as some speed he previously did successful overclocked benchmarks, he has failed here.
but then again, he barely gave it any time to try it.
so he's saying that his computer is now running alot hotter cause of the plugs in my place.
fine, thats a possible thing.
but not at default.
if the computer is at default, I see no reason why the power plug in the wall, will make his computer unstable.
none at all.
overclocked?
sure maybe, since it needs more voltages and such.
but not when the computer is at default.
I can't imagine how this can possibly make him lose 1000 points on 3dmark, cause thats what he thinks is gonna happen.
he's saying he loses 1000 points, cause of the plugs in my wall.
nothing else.
now, I know there can be bad plugs and such, making it unstable for some reason, but that would have to be a truely bad plug in, to vary the amps on a PC by all that much, plus, I thought a Computers PSU would control the amount of amps reaching the motherboard, CPU and such, again negating his "I lose 1000 points, just by your Power supplyu Plug ins" arguement.
this annoys me, cause I can see it a slightly possible thing under highly overclocked conditions, but not something so drastic as losing 1000 points, just ause he benchmarked here at my place instead of in portland.
otherwise, I think PSU's would have a much larger role in overclocking then they really do.
we all know it's best to have a PSU that gets 12+ on the 12 volt line and such, but to say "I lose 1000 points" just cause of a plug in, is a damn thin excuse for me to believe.
othersie I assume power supplys and wall plug ins would play a much larger role in the general knowlege around overclockers wouldn't it?
anyone here, help me with this?
some sort of proof, cause it seems no matter what I tell him, he's gonna try and relate it to his old experience with RC cars, and then tell me this or that.
I just don't see, a plug in, as making that much of a difference.
I can be wrong, but I just can't see it...