Notices

Overclockers Forums > Hardware > CPUs > Intel CPUs
Intel CPUs
Forum Jump

Long Term Overclock Reduces CPU Speed

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe Search this Thread
 
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-18-03, 08:59 AM Thread Starter   #1
weldeng
New Member



Join Date: Mar 2003

 
Unhappy Long Term Overclock Reduces CPU Speed


I have been running a 2.4C1 (SL6RZ) at 3.2 GHz (Prime 95 stable) with default voltage on CPU and Memmory for about three months. Yesterday I turn the machine on and it greets me with "CPU speed error". I reset to all factory defaults and it works fine. Gradually I start bringing up the speed and it now tops out at 3Ghz (not tested for Prime 95 stabilty). I have heard of machines burning in and being stable at higher speeds but never this. Does anyone have any ideas what could have happened?


Thanks!
weldeng is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 05-18-03, 10:19 AM   #2
krag
Classifieds Moderator

 
krag's Avatar 

Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Vancouver, Washington

10 Year Badge
 
First of WELCOME TO THE FORUMS!

Well bro...looks like you may be a victim of electromigration. E.M. is the errosion of the little on/off gates in the silicone of your chip. The theory is that either high voltage or high frequencies (or both)are to blame for wearing down your little silicone buddies. You said it was at default voltage? Well...give some more juice and see what happens. Can't hurt...its already showing sighns of death. Don't feel to bad most of us have lost a chip here or there. It comes with the addiction...you play you pay!

__________________
I.M.O.G. "It's a plugin issue," ...

{Working my hump off @ TSMC}

2600k
Asus P8P67 Pro
4g Corsair Dominator 667
6970 Crossfire
1t Hitachi
Win 7
krag is offline Heatware Profile   QUOTE Thanks
Old 05-18-03, 10:32 AM   #3
baraka
Member



Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: USA

 
Re: Long Term Overclock Reduces CPU Speed


Quote:
Originally posted by weldeng
I have been running a 2.4C1 (SL6RZ) at 3.2 GHz (Prime 95 stable) with default voltage on CPU and Memmory for about three months. Yesterday I turn the machine on and it greets me with "CPU speed error". I reset to all factory defaults and it works fine. Gradually I start bringing up the speed and it now tops out at 3Ghz (not tested for Prime 95 stabilty). I have heard of machines burning in and being stable at higher speeds but never this. Does anyone have any ideas what could have happened?
What kind of temperatures do you get when not idle? It wouldn't surprise me if you see performance degradation over time if your cpu is always running hot.
baraka is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 05-18-03, 10:35 AM   #4
Ununquadium114
Disabled

 
Ununquadium114's Avatar 

Join Date: Apr 2003

 
lol nice speech krag
Ununquadium114 is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 05-18-03, 11:01 AM   #5
batboy
Senior Moment

 
batboy's Avatar 

Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Kansas, USA

10 Year Badge
 
Maybe your thermal paste cooked down to powder. Try reapplying it and maybe check load temps before and after.

__________________
2600K, Asus P8P67 Deluxe, 2X2GB G.Skill Pi PC3-2133, PC & Cooling 750W
watercooled: Eheim 1048 pump, Swiftech Apogee GTX and 2X120mm rad
FS020 case, OCZ SSD, Sapphire HD 6950, Acer X241W 24" widescreen
batboy is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 05-18-03, 11:28 AM Thread Starter   #6
weldeng
New Member



Join Date: Mar 2003

 
Thanks for the welcome and help!

I tried higher voltage and that did not help. Still stuck at 3 Ghz. I have not measured CPU temp but the results are the same even when the machine is stone cold. It will not post or boot into windows at much over 3GHz.

If the problem is this "electromigration" can I expect the CPU to fail altogether or continue to degrade to slower stable overclock speeds?

Could the memory (Kingston Hyper X PC3000) or motherboard (ABIT BD7 raid) be degrading to cause the problem?
weldeng is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 05-18-03, 12:14 PM   #7
micamica1217
Member

 
micamica1217's Avatar 

Join Date: Jun 2002

 
Quote:
Originally posted by weldeng
Thanks for the welcome and help!

Could the memory (Kingston Hyper X PC3000) or motherboard (ABIT BD7 raid) be degrading to cause the problem?
yes

this is what I was thinking....

look at your mobo's capasitors, are they fat, leaking or deformed in some way?

you may not notice anything wrong with the mobo, and it could still be the mobo.

I don't think it is the memory, unless you realy overvolted alot.

what were your load temps with this cpu???
heat could have killed your cpu.

mica

__________________
Q6600 @ 3.0 (3.2 max OC), MSI P6N SLI plat, 4gigs corsair xms2, 2x 9800gtx KO in SLI, X-Fi XGamer, 2x Seagate Barracuda 250gb, Light-on 20x DVD, Thermaltake 750w PSU, air cooled with Ultama-90 and Antec 900 case....Soyo (24D6) 24" wide 14139 vantage

" Comparing the technical relevance of The Inquirer to Beyond3D is like comparing the technical prowess of Paris Hilton to John Carmack." -Albuquerque


[OCG] Fraging at it's finest.
micamica1217 is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 05-18-03, 12:30 PM   #8
jszent
Member

 
jszent's Avatar 

Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Biggest City in Connecticut..Bridgeport

 
dude
what core are you running at? Over 1.70?
jszent is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 05-18-03, 12:37 PM   #9
asw7576
Member

 
asw7576's Avatar 

Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Jakarta

 
Re: Long Term Overclock Reduces CPU Speed


Quote:
Originally posted by weldeng
I have been running a 2.4C1 (SL6RZ) at 3.2 GHz (Prime 95 stable) with default voltage on CPU and Memmory for about three months. Yesterday I turn the machine on and it greets me with "CPU speed error". I reset to all factory defaults and it works fine. Gradually I start bringing up the speed and it now tops out at 3Ghz (not tested for Prime 95 stabilty). I have heard of machines burning in and being stable at higher speeds but never this. Does anyone have any ideas what could have happened?


Thanks!
You may call it: the party is over.... that is happening to me too P4 2.4B SL6RZ @ 3006 MHz @ default voltage. It only last two weeks..... now only 2916 MHz
asw7576 is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 05-18-03, 12:39 PM   #10
micamica1217
Member

 
micamica1217's Avatar 

Join Date: Jun 2002

 
Quote:
Originally posted by jszent
dude
what core are you running at? Over 1.70?
if I'm not mistaken, he was running at default voltage....
and yes, he could have just gotten a bad chip.

mica

__________________
Q6600 @ 3.0 (3.2 max OC), MSI P6N SLI plat, 4gigs corsair xms2, 2x 9800gtx KO in SLI, X-Fi XGamer, 2x Seagate Barracuda 250gb, Light-on 20x DVD, Thermaltake 750w PSU, air cooled with Ultama-90 and Antec 900 case....Soyo (24D6) 24" wide 14139 vantage

" Comparing the technical relevance of The Inquirer to Beyond3D is like comparing the technical prowess of Paris Hilton to John Carmack." -Albuquerque


[OCG] Fraging at it's finest.
micamica1217 is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 05-18-03, 12:41 PM   #11
micamica1217
Member

 
micamica1217's Avatar 

Join Date: Jun 2002

 
Re: Re: Long Term Overclock Reduces CPU Speed


Quote:
Originally posted by asw7576


You may call it: the party is over.... that is happening to me too P4 2.4B SL6RZ @ 3006 MHz @ default voltage. It only last two weeks..... now only 2916 MHz
we need info...

what mobo, cooling, powersuply, temps.......

mica

__________________
Q6600 @ 3.0 (3.2 max OC), MSI P6N SLI plat, 4gigs corsair xms2, 2x 9800gtx KO in SLI, X-Fi XGamer, 2x Seagate Barracuda 250gb, Light-on 20x DVD, Thermaltake 750w PSU, air cooled with Ultama-90 and Antec 900 case....Soyo (24D6) 24" wide 14139 vantage

" Comparing the technical relevance of The Inquirer to Beyond3D is like comparing the technical prowess of Paris Hilton to John Carmack." -Albuquerque


[OCG] Fraging at it's finest.
micamica1217 is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 05-18-03, 01:22 PM Thread Starter   #12
weldeng
New Member



Join Date: Mar 2003

 
I am running 1.525V on CPU, 2.5V on memory. Stable at 3.0 Ghz (166 MHz FSB and memory speed) using Abit BD7 Raid MB. Default voltage on CPU and memory used to be Prime 95 stable at 3.2 GHz. Power supply is 350W Enermax. I do not have means to measure CPU temp. I am using a Vantec AeroFlow Heatsink. I do not see any damage to the capaciters on the motherboard.
weldeng is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 05-18-03, 01:37 PM   #13
Z_oc
Member



Join Date: Mar 2003

 
I had an MSI 845 Ultra ARU that stopped OCing my 1.6A to 2.1 GHz.

However CPU was OK as I was running it with a P4B266 at 2.1 again.

So the mobos might start failing too.
Z_oc is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 05-18-03, 02:05 PM   #14
micamica1217
Member

 
micamica1217's Avatar 

Join Date: Jun 2002

 
Quote:
Originally posted by weldeng
I am running 1.525V on CPU, 2.5V on memory. Stable at 3.0 Ghz (166 MHz FSB and memory speed) using Abit BD7 Raid MB. Default voltage on CPU and memory used to be Prime 95 stable at 3.2 GHz. Power supply is 350W Enermax. I do not have means to measure CPU temp. I am using a Vantec AeroFlow Heatsink. I do not see any damage to the capaciters on the motherboard.
thanks weldeng, yet I was talking to asw7576...

did you say 350w enermax????

this could be the cause...but you shouldn't have been stable from the start. yet maybe your rails are poor now....

tell us, what is your 3.3, 5 and 12v rails look like?

mica

__________________
Q6600 @ 3.0 (3.2 max OC), MSI P6N SLI plat, 4gigs corsair xms2, 2x 9800gtx KO in SLI, X-Fi XGamer, 2x Seagate Barracuda 250gb, Light-on 20x DVD, Thermaltake 750w PSU, air cooled with Ultama-90 and Antec 900 case....Soyo (24D6) 24" wide 14139 vantage

" Comparing the technical relevance of The Inquirer to Beyond3D is like comparing the technical prowess of Paris Hilton to John Carmack." -Albuquerque


[OCG] Fraging at it's finest.
micamica1217 is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 05-18-03, 03:10 PM Thread Starter   #15
weldeng
New Member



Join Date: Mar 2003

 
Mica

What application do most people use under XP for monitoring voltage and temp?

CPU-z telling me that CPU at 1.520V and IO voltage is 3.424V when running at 3.0 Ghz
weldeng is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 05-18-03, 05:19 PM   #16
Caffinehog
Übercaffinated Member

 
Caffinehog's Avatar 

Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: In the lab

 
Sudden northwood death syndrome. It's well documented in overvolted cpus, and I suspected it would appear in non-overvolted but overclocked cpu's soon. Considering this, I suspect it will start to happen with default speed cpu's in about a year, which could be a real PR nightmare for Intel.
Caffinehog is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 05-18-03, 08:17 PM Thread Starter   #17
weldeng
New Member



Join Date: Mar 2003

 
Very good point. I made the mistake of thinking that if I ran the CPU at stock voltage it ought to last just as long as a normal P4. I got three months at 3.2Ghz. I think Intel could be in for problems if they release the P4 Northwood at 3.2Ghz or higher.
weldeng is offline   QUOTE Thanks

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe


Overclockers Forums > Hardware > CPUs > Intel CPUs
Intel CPUs
Forum Jump

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Mobile Skin
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:03 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
You can add these icons by updating your profile information to include your Heatware ID, Benching Profile ID or your Folding/SETI profile ID. Edit your profile!
X

Welcome to Overclockers.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

New members like you have made this the best community on the Internet since 1998!


(4 digit year)

Why Join Us?

  • Share experience
  • Max out your hardware
  • Best forum members anywhere
  • Customized forum experience

Already a member?