Something is wrong...

OLMI · May 25, 2003

this is my first time trying to do this foldin business, so i really need help... my folding seems to be realllly slow or somethin.. check out this screenshot.

1. i set up kdfold so it should be monitoring my main rig while it folds
2. i start the FAH2console.exe with -advmethods

did i do everything correctly? the kdfold screen doesnt even update at all... i really want to start foldin

Ben721 · May 25, 2003

I'd say let it complete a frame first then report back.

Give it about 20 minutes to be safe, then it should start moving.

OLMI · May 25, 2003

ok, i shall report back in 20 minutes hehe

Cjwinnit · May 25, 2003

Give it a few minutes...

OLMI · May 25, 2003

oh, hey, it already started working ahaha.. it seemed to start a lot faster than before though, but ok, my bad

.. ok, a few more questions..

1. what do i add to fah3console.exe to make it hidden?
2. is there a stats page for team 32 where my name might appear? and if so, how long does it take to update?
3. do you recommend kdfold for monitoring, or somethin else?

Cjwinnit · May 25, 2003

Welcome To The Fold!!!

This is a good stats page, but there are a few.

portorock · May 25, 2003

You can do a few things to hide folding. You can check the sticky at the top of the folding page about borging. Works great. THere is a proggy called "hide it" that works fine also.

NiTrO bOiE · May 25, 2003

OLMI said:
2. is there a stats page for team 32 where my name might appear? and if so, how long does it take to update?

The folding.stanford.edu stats page (about 20 minutes) updates quicker than the extremeoverclocking stat page. (every 3 hours) Also the extremeoverclocking stats page is more detailed.

OLMI · May 25, 2003

aweome..

do i have the whole protein completed to be seen anywhere on the stats pages?

what do you guys use to monitor your folding?

NiTrO bOiE · May 25, 2003

OLMI said:
aweome..

do i have the whole protein completed to be seen anywhere on the stats pages?

what do you guys use to monitor your folding?

Yes, when you finish the protein it uploads the results to the servers which then display your stats. I use Electron Miscroscope III. It's easy to use, and monitors other systems over the LAN also.

Ben721 · May 25, 2003

I use EMIII aswell, monitoring 2 other pc's over the lan including mine.

OLMI · May 25, 2003

will i lose my work if i close both of these programs to switch to EMIII?

Ben721 · May 25, 2003

OLMI said:
will i lose my work if i close both of these programs to switch to EMIII?

You shouldn't.

I did it recently and didn't loose any work.

OLMI · May 25, 2003

ok, well i switched to EMIII, but now i have a new problem...

after completing a frame, which noticably takes less time to complete, it sticks at 100%, and then after a while, gives me a "time per frame problem" message on the computer thing by the progress bar...

Ben721 · May 25, 2003

I never seen that before, I'd just let it run and see if it can correct itself in around 20 minutes.

BTW how long does it normally take you to complete frames?

OLMI · May 25, 2003

i unchecked some option, (use 2.5 second interval instead of default 5 seconds), and it started workin again.. that or it just fixed itself somehow...

it says the time per frame is about 12 minutes, how is that?... i guess before when it was really fast the progress bar got messed up or something..

OCn00b · May 25, 2003

It gave you that problem because of the estimated frame times(41 seconds). After it completes a frame and it can give you the correct frame times, it will return to normal. That happens every time I get a 53.3 point gromacs. It originally says the frame time is like 36 seconds then after it finishes the first frame it goes back to normal.

OLMI · May 25, 2003

ya, that's what i was thinkin after it seemed to fix itself, something with a timing problem making the progress bar look fast..

how long does it take you guys to complete frames?

Ben721 · May 25, 2003

With my 1700+@1850 on average it takes around 8:50.

OCn00b · May 25, 2003

For a 543 like in your picture, my 2400+ averages around 5:52 a frame and my 2100+ averages around 5:30 per frame.

Something is wrong...

Member

Official X-Hour Man

Member

B&

Member

B&

Member

Member

Member

Member

Official X-Hour Man

Member

Official X-Hour Man

Member

Official X-Hour Man

Member

Member

Member

Official X-Hour Man

Member

Similar threads