• Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!

P4 2.8c@3850mhz Extreme Passive Watercooled by F2 Extreme

Overclockers is supported by our readers. When you click a link to make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn More.
C

copyman

Member
​
Joined
Jun 16, 2002
Location
Brazil \ Florianopolis A \ sc
P4 2.8c@3850mhz Extreme Watercooled by F2 Extreme

hello friends, it would like to divide my results, and to know which your results and temperatures

please, post your system configurations (computer and wc), overclock and temperatures

if somebody has interest in some test in lower overclock for comparison it is only to ask

System

P42.8c @ 3850mhz (ic7g2adv)
Geil PC3500 premiun platinum 275mhz \ 220mhz 2 3 3 6
dm8 20 gb
PSU: Enermax eg465ax-ve (w) FCA

Wc

Rad: F2 Extreme 4x Global Win 120 x 120 x 38mm
Pump: Quietone 4332 litros hora
Block: LRWW


1.jpg


2.jpg


3.jpg


4.jpg


5.jpg
 
9782 mips?

thats it? i score 10455 with my 2.4b at 3.62ghz and i don't have HT. you should be well over 11k.

btw how is it passively cooled if you have 4 fans on the radiator?

1.85vcore. hope you don't plan on keeping that chip around very long.
 
Maxvla said:
9782 mips?

thats it? i score 10455 with my 2.4b at 3.62ghz and i don't have HT. you should be well over 11k.

btw how is it passively cooled if you have 4 fans on the radiator?

1.85vcore. hope you don't plan on keeping that chip around very long.
Click to expand...

excuse friend, more in my country Brazil, referred the passive, without pertier and chiller

With relationship to the result of the sandra, with enabled ht the result an is little worse, incredible not?

be calm as the voltages, I use 1,72v day by day in the to 3800 mhz, and although it has gotten several over records with wc, I never lost only one processor in my life

cya
 
HT should add about 500-800 mips

like i said at 3.85ghz you should be around 11,500 mips.

something is seriously wrong with your chip if turning it on decreases scores.
 
you need to download sandra 2003 build 3944

then run your mips again.
 
Maxvla said:
HT should add about 500-800 mips

like i said at 3.85ghz you should be around 11,500 mips.

something is seriously wrong with your chip if turning it on decreases scores.
Click to expand...

it can be my sandra 2003 by fosi :D , I will check here

thermal t is disabled and even if was activated the temps they would not leave you work , very strange.

thank you very much


see if you like amd more...

http://forum.oc-forums.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=204472
 
your amd system is scoring higher then your intel at only 2.7ghz, why is that?
 
NoxioN said:
your amd system is scoring higher then your intel at only 2.7ghz, why is that?
Click to expand...

things of synthetic benchmarks,

I have just made the tests with the sandra mach3 with and without enabled ht, the results you can see below

but although the expected difference is larger than introduced her, don't make a mistake, the amd in rude processing come out very well

it can have you still vary reasons for that, as some programs and updatings in the xp that were not in the amd and they can influence the results in the sandra, and thousands of other....

the results in other benchmarks were larger in relation to the sandra

super pi 40s amd 37s p4

pcmark amd 8320 points cpu p4 9620 points cpu

madness madness

sandra 2003 mach3

no ht :

6.jpg


7.jpg


8.jpg


9.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
  • Locked
P4 2.8c@3850mhz Extreme Passive Watercooled by F2 Extreme
Replies
10
Views
768
Thelemac
Thelemac
C
xp1700+@2700Mhz Extreme Passive Watercooled
2
Replies
27
Views
1K
copyman
C
ssprncvegeta
Overclocking Guide
2 3 4
Replies
76
Views
200K
Amd_kick_arse
Amd_kick_arse
Back