- Joined
- Mar 15, 2001
- Location
- Mt. Brudges, Ontario, CA
my mian concern here is the quality of the chip. the way i see it is that with the 1.4GHz 200FSB chip you actualy get more MHz for your money and a higher quality chip because it is set to run at 14*100. Where as the 266 chip is basicaly a overclocked 1100 running at 10.5*133. My second concern is will a 200FSB chip be capable of just as high of FSB as a 266FSB chip? Is there a reason why the 266 cost less than the 200? any help would be very good