Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
The overclocker's article had nothing to do with brand name fraud. It was about content mislabelling.Susquehannock said:This issue has been floating around for a while now.
If it isn't spelled correctly on the package look out!
Artic vs. Arctic ...
Arctic Silver fraud
The testing solution was Nitric acid and Muriatic acid that was pre-mixed professionally.
Fink said:Dont jump to conclusions just yet....
There are some serious flaws with the way the materials were tested. The test do not take into consideration the solubility of the binder in water. Most of the thermal pastes are silicone oil based, which does not have very high water solubility as everyone who has tried to wash this stuff off your hands knows.
I would ask that either the author rework his experiment to remove the binder from the 'silver' prior to testing or use a different testing method altogether (ICP-AAS, FAAS).
Big_Baller said:Very nice SSS (I wonder if nanotherm will ever make a "silver" paste )
I wonder what OCZ and comp will say...if anything. What sparked the idea of testing for silver?