- Joined
- Jul 31, 2003
- Location
- Los Angeles, Palo Alto, Lake Tahoe
Im very sorry to bother my friends here with this question but I am horrible at math and I need to triple check a percentage here...
Im trying to get this str8, im pretty sure I did the math correctly=
a 30% increase on a 2.8 would be at 3640 correct?
and a 50% increase on a 3.0 would be 4500?
reason I ask is cause i have a Mach I and a mach II unit here, and both the CPUs,
on the mach I ...I have just replaced my mobo (shorted it) with another Abit Ic7 max mobo, and replaced the CPU (shorted also lol), with the same CPU as before , the 2.8, I run this at 3.9ghz, but if I am doing my math correctly then that means I am above the 30% increase that Nventiv says right?
ok well on my main rig, the one I use the mach II on, I have a 3.0 @ 4.0 on my chaintech 9cjs zenith mobo, but Nventiv states I can have a 50% increase in speed, so I havent really tried to up the CPU to 4.5 but I wanted to triple check this math, if so then I guess I will up the vcore and FSB and lower the memory ratio and cross my fingers on stability.
Im trying to get this str8, im pretty sure I did the math correctly=
a 30% increase on a 2.8 would be at 3640 correct?
and a 50% increase on a 3.0 would be 4500?
reason I ask is cause i have a Mach I and a mach II unit here, and both the CPUs,
on the mach I ...I have just replaced my mobo (shorted it) with another Abit Ic7 max mobo, and replaced the CPU (shorted also lol), with the same CPU as before , the 2.8, I run this at 3.9ghz, but if I am doing my math correctly then that means I am above the 30% increase that Nventiv says right?
ok well on my main rig, the one I use the mach II on, I have a 3.0 @ 4.0 on my chaintech 9cjs zenith mobo, but Nventiv states I can have a 50% increase in speed, so I havent really tried to up the CPU to 4.5 but I wanted to triple check this math, if so then I guess I will up the vcore and FSB and lower the memory ratio and cross my fingers on stability.