Help me choose plz between those two plz

Hyperx pc3700 or OCZ pc3200

There is a nice deal on ncix

http://www.ncix.com/products/index.php?sku=10801&promoid=1022

KINGSTON HYPERX 512MB DUAL CHANNEL KIT PC3700 2X256MB DDR 466MHZ

or

http://www.ncix.com/products/index.php?sku=9025&promoid=1022

OCZ 512MB PC3200 DDR400 CAS2 184PIN W/ COPPER HEAT SPREADER

I plan to get the hyperx ..however I would like to hear your opinions. I know it's an overkill ...but would it run well at 400- 415 mhz with agressive timings ?


Thx

how about some mushkin pc3500 lvl 2 you can over clock that badboy and run very aggressive timming's.....Mushkin would kill kingston if you kno what you are doin and give it the right amount of voltage and timming's...treat it like you would your cpu

Not always. Kingston BH-5 and Mushkin BH-5 should perform pretty closely to each other. With the same chips and both having good PCB's, there really isn't much difference between the two. It's not as much about brands as what's under the heatspreaders.

He's right though, with an AMD system you should try to get some BH-5 if you can. That's found in Mushkin PC3200/3500 Level II.

I can guarantee that kingston ain't bh-5. Look at the specs.

Timing Reference: 3-4-4-8-1 at +2.6V

Click to expand...

This from an email I recieved last week

HyperX 3700 's are not rated BH
Regards,

Julio C Andrade
Kingston Technology
Technical Support

Click to expand...

That particular OCZ is rated 2-3-3, which leads me to think it's probably not bh-5 either.