Apologies if this has been asked millions of times before, but ...
If you have 2 drives in a PC you potentially get better performance if you have them on separate IDE channels, than if there were master and slave of the same channel.
My PC has two ATA133 HDDs on the primary IDE channel, and 2 CD ROMs on the secondary. I have just come accross an old Promise Ultra 66 dual channel controller PCI card. So if I put my 2 HDDs as the master drives of the two mobo IDE channels and run the CD ROMs from this PCI controller (also on separate channels if necessary) am I going to have a potentially higher performing system?
With my existing, and relatively normal setup, I get some CD burning issues that I don't agree with, i.e. my 52x burner writes at about 4 speed when disk to disk copying, while it will write at full speed when burning from HDD.
Thanks.
If you have 2 drives in a PC you potentially get better performance if you have them on separate IDE channels, than if there were master and slave of the same channel.
My PC has two ATA133 HDDs on the primary IDE channel, and 2 CD ROMs on the secondary. I have just come accross an old Promise Ultra 66 dual channel controller PCI card. So if I put my 2 HDDs as the master drives of the two mobo IDE channels and run the CD ROMs from this PCI controller (also on separate channels if necessary) am I going to have a potentially higher performing system?
With my existing, and relatively normal setup, I get some CD burning issues that I don't agree with, i.e. my 52x burner writes at about 4 speed when disk to disk copying, while it will write at full speed when burning from HDD.
Thanks.