This isn't meant to be an insult nor a flamewar but
It occurs to me:There seems to be always some bunch of ppl doing something the second some website review says something. What kind of sense is in this acting?
On the topic:
S939 may seem the way to go now, but the benefits over s754 are very lightweight in terms of performance (check some benches before starting to dream). And there is no greater level of futureproof in it either even if amd wants you to believe that. You can go out now, trash your clawhammer cg and the dfi and buy the next best 90nm s939 cpu and mobo and think you'll be done for the whole next year...
but think again: nforce4, dual pci-e sli and ddr2 will force you so upgrade soon if you want to keep up with the pace (seems so you want to) :=) Maybe those features will arrive on the s939 too but you need to go out and buy another board (where's the futureproofness in this behaviour?) And believe me, the second one anandtech review finds out that nforce4 is THE way to go you will find yourself again in some certain "the second after"-situation again. Damn those moods do cost a fortune, don't they? ;=)
My advice: stay with your rig, even after the second some anandtech review finds out that 90nm is helluva lot better than an oced clawhammer cg.
The typical Clawhammer CG you own will oc to at least 2.4 ghz (if you don't oc it why do you have the dfi?), this will be 3700+ speeds and any migration to the s939 won't yield you so much more power.
If you do want the best of the best why don't you shoot for an athlon fx?
Ah, and just a sidenote: if you feel like worshipping some hardware review website, devoting your life and your soul, there may be some better ones out there than anandtech (lol)