d94 $30 a phone Joined Sep 26, 2004 Location 48302 Nov 5, 2004 #1 is having a higher memory w/3.3ns better than memory thats has 2.2ns? or is it the other way around?...
is having a higher memory w/3.3ns better than memory thats has 2.2ns? or is it the other way around?...
HaTE Member Joined Dec 6, 2002 Location SLC, Utah, USA Nov 5, 2004 #2 the lower the ns rating is the better
Lifthanger Member Joined Jun 30, 2004 Location Wöschbach LMAO Nov 5, 2004 #3 when T is cylce time and f is the frequency it works like that: f = 1/T e.g. : T = 2ns => f = 1/2*10^(-9) = 500 MHz (would be 1GHz in DDR) and as said above, the lower T, the higher is f.
when T is cylce time and f is the frequency it works like that: f = 1/T e.g. : T = 2ns => f = 1/2*10^(-9) = 500 MHz (would be 1GHz in DDR) and as said above, the lower T, the higher is f.
V veryhumid Member Joined Apr 22, 2004 Location New Hampshire Nov 5, 2004 #4 cooooooool!!! and i knew that! so the time tells the frequency of the chips! bravo! I have overlooked that for a long time!
cooooooool!!! and i knew that! so the time tells the frequency of the chips! bravo! I have overlooked that for a long time!
Lifthanger Member Joined Jun 30, 2004 Location Wöschbach LMAO Nov 5, 2004 #5 veryhumid said: cooooooool!!! and i knew that! so the time tells the frequency of the chips! bravo! I have overlooked that for a long time! Click to expand... not quite sure if I get you wrong, but there's no need to be cynical.. he asked politely so I've answered him.. what's wrong?
veryhumid said: cooooooool!!! and i knew that! so the time tells the frequency of the chips! bravo! I have overlooked that for a long time! Click to expand... not quite sure if I get you wrong, but there's no need to be cynical.. he asked politely so I've answered him.. what's wrong?