-
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
Anyone beat this benchmark?
- Thread starter AZNCOOLED
- Start date
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2001
- Location
- Kansas, USA
I can't even read the scores.
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2004
- Location
- Denver, CO
I typed out a reply before i noticed "no FX-55 users"......lol
My 3.9GHz Intel actually holds pretty well with my FX-55 in *most* things (at stock of course). A high overclocked Intel would take my vote tbh, i just love HT, it's so nice. I use my Intel rigs for daily use just because of how good it feels in windows. Load up a game, now that's another story
My 3.9GHz Intel actually holds pretty well with my FX-55 in *most* things (at stock of course). A high overclocked Intel would take my vote tbh, i just love HT, it's so nice. I use my Intel rigs for daily use just because of how good it feels in windows. Load up a game, now that's another story
OP
AZNCOOLED
Disabled
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2004
- Thread Starter
- #4
Sucka said:I typed out a reply before i noticed "no FX-55 users"......lol
My 3.9GHz Intel actually holds pretty well with my FX-55 in *most* things (at stock of course). A high overclocked Intel would take my vote tbh, i just love HT, it's so nice. I use my Intel rigs for daily use just because of how good it feels in windows. Load up a game, now that's another story
Cool so your saying HT is really good. I might just take that as advice and not upgrade to a fx55. a grand is alot of money for a cpu and mobo!
But yeah this computer seems fast to me , i just dont see myself spending that money now.
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2004
- Location
- Denver, CO
AZNCOOLED said:
My memory bandwidth (all be it 275 x 2) is way higher than that. CPU marks on that synthetic bench aren't far off at all though. My super-pi is 29secs, ect. The FX-55 is really nice, but performance/price, i would probably go with a 3500+ .90
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2004
- Location
- Denver, CO
AZNCOOLED said:
What kind of cooling are you planing to use? What type of budget do you have? It's hard for me to reccomend a $850 chip if you're on a tight budget. I work very hard for my money, and spend it accordingly
The FX-55 is all it's hyped up to be, and more if clocked properly, but the 3500+ .90 is no slouch, if money is an issue, that's the way i would go. If not, i would go for a FX-55. If you're patient, i would wait till years end and see what NF4/pci-e does on the AMD's. Not to mention the next FX should see .90, could be worth waiting for, esspecially since you have a 4.2 Intel to hold you over
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2003
bout the same as this rig built in feb..... see sig...air cooled..
- Joined
- May 9, 2004
- Location
- Check your Six...
should I show off what my CPU can do?
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2004
- Location
- Denver, CO
Osirus said:
Indeed.
- Joined
- May 9, 2004
- Location
- Check your Six...
It has been done - Really close on a lot of the test's
2.75ghz
And
2.7ghz
2.75ghz
And
2.7ghz
