Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
bobmanfoo said:
Even the INQ said so. They said that it would support both but AMD would "turn on" each function incrementally. Starting with SSE3....DanIdentity said:SSE3 is definitely coming, but DDR2, I doubt. Even if the chips include it, the article says it will be disabled initially.
I'd wait...cuz Im going e-die as soon as they show upbobmanfoo said:is it worth it to wait for SSE3? got my Winchester coming and am wondering if i should cancel
Steven4563 said:hmmmm now should i get a 3200+ now or wait even longer they need to make there minds up what they are and not having in their CPU's
whtz tht all about ....I'd wait...cuz Im going e-die as soon as they show up
hmmmm now should i get a 3200+ now or wait even longer they need to make there minds up what they are and not having in their CPU's
i don't think you can just turn it on, maybe with a hard mod though, but who know, we'll have to just wait and seeQuailane said:Because the chips have ddr2 that is turned off initially and ddr1, does that mean later on they will support both ddr2 and ddr1 without having to buy another chip, only a new mobo?
At least according to what the Taiwanese mobo makers are saying, the next revision of 90nm Hammers, Revision E, is supposed to be out early next year.
It will include SSE3 support, which you'd rather have than not, and will feature tweaks to the Hammer's memory controller for integrated graphics use (which won't help most reading this one bit).
A new stepping always has the potential of increased performance, but let's note a couple things from the abovementioned link.
First, this is revision E of the chip. That means it's the fifth stepping of this chip. That's a lot, and just as much as Prescott is due to have. AMD didn't even let any get out the door until the fourth generation, so they're obviously struggling with this.
Second, it doesn't look like AMD will put out a chip that will go at more than 2.8GHz in 2005. This is not terribly good news for those who want at least 3GHz out of one of these eventually.
If it's going to take AMD five shots to be able to make at least a decent amount of chips capable of 2.6GHz, I'm sorry, but there's not a whole lot of headroom left in these chips. No knock on AMD, after all that would be better than what Intel ended up with, and they haven't been promising a major ramp, but I think a lot of people still have unrealistic expectations.
The sad reality in our world is that a late model Northwood system bought six-nine months ago and overclocked to 3.5-3.6GHz will still look awfully good against anything vaguely affordable you'll be able to buy at the end of 2005. The rate of improvement has collapsed.
oc_byagi said:BTW, can anyone clarify if nForce 4 and K8T890 will have any AGP solutions??? (sorry for off-topic, didn't wanna make a new thread for this)