-
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
Fun with a new 560J
- Thread starter uclajd
- Start date
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2001
- Location
- Kansas, USA
Vcore is a little high. Hope you don't fry something.
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2003
- Location
- cZech republic
I think I'll go pee on my s478 mobo now, so that I can get the one u have!!
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2004
- Location
- Dallas, TX
uclajd ~ got your vapo hooked up yet?
- Thread Starter
- #6
Vapo results
Got too tired last night to post. Here's some I ran today, and the room wasn't all that cold:
Some Vapo results:
Likely can go higher - crashed at 5100 halfway through. The temp just goes up too high by the end of 1M. Sure I could get 5035 or 5045.
Screenie only:
Note this is 1:1 w/ RAM, so the RAM is holding it back (if you can call DDR-578.5 "holding you back"). Seems like these boards are a lot less stable when using dividers instead of 1:1.
I've still got some playing around to do.
Should be fun to run some 3DMarks. Just fooling around I know I can 3D bench above 4900. But the vid card needs a little modding, as it isn't volting as high as it was. Stay tuned...
Got too tired last night to post. Here's some I ran today, and the room wasn't all that cold:
Some Vapo results:
Likely can go higher - crashed at 5100 halfway through. The temp just goes up too high by the end of 1M. Sure I could get 5035 or 5045.
Screenie only:
Note this is 1:1 w/ RAM, so the RAM is holding it back (if you can call DDR-578.5 "holding you back"). Seems like these boards are a lot less stable when using dividers instead of 1:1.
I've still got some playing around to do.
Should be fun to run some 3DMarks. Just fooling around I know I can 3D bench above 4900. But the vid card needs a little modding, as it isn't volting as high as it was. Stay tuned...
Last edited:
- Joined
- May 26, 2004
- Location
- Southeast Michigan
uclajd said:Got too tired last night to post. Here's some I ran today, and the room wasn't all that cold:
Some Vapo results:
Likely can go higher - crashed at 5100 halfway through. The temp just goes up to high by the end of 1M. Sure I could get 5035 or 5045.
Screenie only:
Note this is 1:1 w/ RAM, so the RAM is holding it back (if you can call DDR-578.5 "holding you back"). Seems like these boards are a lot less stable when using dividers instead of 1:1.
I've still got some playing around to do.
Should be fun to run some 3DMarks. Just fooling around I know I can 3D bench above 4900. But the vid card needs a little modding, as it isn't volting as high as it was. Stay tuned...
SWEET!!!!!
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2004
- Location
- Chicago - USA
/me looks at my Zalman 7700cu, and swears at it.
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2003
- Location
- cZech republic
rofl, that might help
nice going so far!!
nice going so far!!
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2004
- Location
- Milwaukee, WI
omg...
you just changed my mind from buying a 530J and set it upon a 560J... though it'll only be water cooled, thoes are some SEXY overclocks without the vapo
you just changed my mind from buying a 530J and set it upon a 560J... though it'll only be water cooled, thoes are some SEXY overclocks without the vapo
- Thread Starter
- #12
Notice updated scores in sig. 
One weird thing about these Js, is they have some really funky throttling. You think it's running at 5.0, but by default it throttles down to half that under load.
You can turn throttling off (as far as I can tell) in the bios, but you won't be able to clock as high in some benches (2003 - 4.798 max). However, I was able to bench @ 4.927 in 2005, 4.917 in 2001, and Aqua @ 4.907 with throttling turned off. It's strange, when you hit the wall, the PC doesn't reboot, the programs either crash or freeze. Some programs are unforgiving at high clocks I guess, like when pi warns you about errors.
This DFI BIOS doesn't let one get at the throttling settings as deeply as I would like.
BTW, this "T2" throttling doesn't show up in ThrottleWatch or CPU-Z.
Next up: Pelt on video card.
One weird thing about these Js, is they have some really funky throttling. You think it's running at 5.0, but by default it throttles down to half that under load.
You can turn throttling off (as far as I can tell) in the bios, but you won't be able to clock as high in some benches (2003 - 4.798 max). However, I was able to bench @ 4.927 in 2005, 4.917 in 2001, and Aqua @ 4.907 with throttling turned off. It's strange, when you hit the wall, the PC doesn't reboot, the programs either crash or freeze. Some programs are unforgiving at high clocks I guess, like when pi warns you about errors.
This DFI BIOS doesn't let one get at the throttling settings as deeply as I would like.
BTW, this "T2" throttling doesn't show up in ThrottleWatch or CPU-Z.
Next up: Pelt on video card.
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2004
- Location
- Chicago - USA
My understanding is that TM2 throttling is inately internal to the chip, and cannot be disabled. I wish I could say I'm 100% sure of this, but I cannot. This stuff is all so new. I'm pretty certain I'm right, though.
Hopefully there could be some type of BIOS enabled work-around available at some point, like the ones to enable an i865P chipset to perform like an i875P in memory b/w.
Strat
Hopefully there could be some type of BIOS enabled work-around available at some point, like the ones to enable an i865P chipset to perform like an i875P in memory b/w.
Strat
- Thread Starter
- #14
Well, according to DFI's online manual, you can adjust it:Stratcat said:
Unfortunately, none of these features are actually available in the bios!
All I actually do have is this:
I've set this to "disabled," but I'm not sure if that is T1 or T2.
Weirdness.
Similar threads
