Problems with Sentential's method of burning in (cant get the vcore any lower)

LoneWolf121188 · 02-19-05, 05:19 PM

Ok, so I'm at 1.187 vcore and I ran CPU burn in overnight, but I still cant post at 1.175. Prime is fine, so I tried another 4 hours. no good. Any help?

CPU-Z and ASUSprobe both report 1.2 vcore solid (no fluctuations, like at 1.2 vcore in the BIOS, CPU-Z would fluctuate up to 1.214 and down to about 1.119 or something like that).

I'm getting kinda sick of having to do the whole clear RTC procedure...I've probably done it about 6 or 7 times in the past 12 or so hours.

LoneWolf121188 · 02-19-05, 08:37 PM

Anyone?

I'm trying this: I upped the HTT to 203. I'll prime for a while, and if its not stable, I'll run CPU burn in. If it's OK, I'll up it a little more, then repeat until Prime gets errors. Then its an overnighter of CPU burn in.

[EDIT] That seemed to get it. prime quit after 14 min. CPU burn in is running! Hope this lowers my vcore [/EDIT]

EvilCloudStrife · 02-19-05, 09:56 PM

run cpu burn overnight with it.. he says that it is a long process, but worth it in the end... keep pushing it, it will turn!

darkknight187 · 02-19-05, 10:14 PM

the numbers you give show a .3v lower core than stock, i would be mucho happy with that and start seeing what clocks/temps you can get with juice closer to stock....i believe in the "voodoo magic" that a burn in is....but i would think at such a undervolt you have hit your lowest wall but with that said it may be possible for you to oc it then over some time get it back down really low.....also if you don't already once you get er all steadied out take her to the folding team and crunch some bigpackets

mudpark41 · 02-19-05, 10:26 PM

After burning for a good 20 hours I was able to go from 13 hour prime fail at 1.7 to a 20 hour prime fail at 1.675. I am running a XP chip but still...

EspElement · 02-20-05, 01:32 AM

well this is wat happens to me... i got my 3000+ at 1.55v 250*10 = 2.5GHz and it runs prime for about 30 mins.. i run the test for 4 hours.. i got 1 hour and 30 mins.. then i ran it over night.. ran prime.. and in 2 hours my computer freezes

i tried the same process over night.. ran it for 10 hours this time.. then tried again.. and it froze!! ugh then i tried again.. same thing!

i agree it helped.. but why do u think im locking up?

LoneWolf121188 · 02-20-05, 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by darkknight187

the numbers you give show a .3v lower core than stock, i would be mucho happy with that and start seeing what clocks/temps you can get with juice closer to stock....i believe in the "voodoo magic" that a burn in is....but i would think at such a undervolt you have hit your lowest wall but with that said it may be possible for you to oc it then over some time get it back down really low.....

I was afraid someone was going to say that. I finished the burn at 203x11, so I'll put the HTT back to stock and lower the vcore a notch. If that doesn't work, I'll just start OCing it like it is. I've already got it up to 220x11 before, and I have a feeling it can go quite a bit higher, with the RAM sacrificeing speed for that (I have to run it at CPU/14)

Sentential · 02-20-05, 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LoneWolf121188

I was afraid someone was going to say that. I finished the burn at 203x11, so I'll put the HTT back to stock and lower the vcore a notch. If that doesn't work, I'll just start OCing it like it is. I've already got it up to 220x11 before, and I have a feeling it can go quite a bit higher, with the RAM sacrificeing speed for that (I have to run it at CPU/14)

Wish I could help ya more, but it really just takes a long ass time to do more than anything else. Just keep at it, it ususally takes me a week before i start seeing results.

darkknight187 · 02-20-05, 09:10 AM

i would say if you can get it that low at near stock speeds she ought to OC like a mofo because you have a way higher safe range of voltages to try so good luck

Sentential · 02-20-05, 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by darkknight187

i would say if you can get it that low at near stock speeds she ought to OC like a mofo because you have a way higher safe range of voltages to try so good luck

That would take a loooong time. Usually .05v is enough to gain almost 100mhz.

LoneWolf121188 · 02-20-05, 09:15 AM

That didn't work. I'm at 220x11 now with 1.6125 on the vcore (1.648 from CPU-Z...that just a LITTLE off...). I'll drop it until Pime quits, then burn.

darkknight187 · 02-20-05, 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sentential

That would take a loooong time. Usually .05v is enough to gain almost 100mhz.

yea i had to up about .125v to get 230*10 stable with 1.6v hopefully after a week or so of folding i'll be easin off on it. i would really like to starve it back to 1.57v where it would boot and burn in but i really need this rig folding as much as possible

LoneWolf121188 · 02-20-05, 09:27 AM

Wow, check this out: 220x11 at 1.325 BIOS, 1.344 CPU-Z. At 1.3125, Windows would reboot at the loading screen. Time to run some CPU burn in.

02-19-05, 05:19 PM	Thread Starter #1
LoneWolf121188 Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Sheppard Air Force Base, TX	Problems with Sentential's method of burning in (cant get the vcore any lower) Ok, so I'm at 1.187 vcore and I ran CPU burn in overnight, but I still cant post at 1.175. Prime is fine, so I tried another 4 hours. no good. Any help? CPU-Z and ASUSprobe both report 1.2 vcore solid (no fluctuations, like at 1.2 vcore in the BIOS, CPU-Z would fluctuate up to 1.214 and down to about 1.119 or something like that). I'm getting kinda sick of having to do the whole clear RTC procedure...I've probably done it about 6 or 7 times in the past 12 or so hours. __________________ mATX Desktop (Build Log Here): Core i7 3770K @ 4.9GHz 1.53V, Maximus V Gene, 16GB DDR3-1600 RipjawX, EVGA GTX780, Intel 520 240GB, Seagate 2TB, EK CPU and GPU waterblocks, MCP35X, 120.1 and 180.1 radiators Coming Soon: 4770K, Maximus VI Gene. 15" MacBook Pro: 2.66GHz Core i7 620M, 8GB DDR3, OCZ Vertex 2 120GB, 500GB Seagate 7200.4, GeForce 330M 512MB, OS X 10.8.2, Windows 7 x64 Asus Eee Slate EP121: 1.33GHz Core i5 470UM, 4GB DDR3, Intel 320 80GB, Windows 8 x64 The Hardware Destruction Thread\|OCForums Musicians Club Member -12\|OCForums Metal Club Member -12 Well, if he opens the box and its dead, then it would be his fault because the state of the cat is determined by the observer. Then we could be all ‘n00b, you collapsed the wavefunction now! - RoadWarrior, on Schrödinger’s Cat
	QUOTE Thanks

02-19-05, 08:37 PM	Thread Starter #2
LoneWolf121188 Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Sheppard Air Force Base, TX	Anyone? I'm trying this: I upped the HTT to 203. I'll prime for a while, and if its not stable, I'll run CPU burn in. If it's OK, I'll up it a little more, then repeat until Prime gets errors. Then its an overnighter of CPU burn in. [EDIT] That seemed to get it. prime quit after 14 min. CPU burn in is running! Hope this lowers my vcore [/EDIT] __________________ mATX Desktop (Build Log Here): Core i7 3770K @ 4.9GHz 1.53V, Maximus V Gene, 16GB DDR3-1600 RipjawX, EVGA GTX780, Intel 520 240GB, Seagate 2TB, EK CPU and GPU waterblocks, MCP35X, 120.1 and 180.1 radiators Coming Soon: 4770K, Maximus VI Gene. 15" MacBook Pro: 2.66GHz Core i7 620M, 8GB DDR3, OCZ Vertex 2 120GB, 500GB Seagate 7200.4, GeForce 330M 512MB, OS X 10.8.2, Windows 7 x64 Asus Eee Slate EP121: 1.33GHz Core i5 470UM, 4GB DDR3, Intel 320 80GB, Windows 8 x64 The Hardware Destruction Thread\|OCForums Musicians Club Member -12\|OCForums Metal Club Member -12 Well, if he opens the box and its dead, then it would be his fault because the state of the cat is determined by the observer. Then we could be all ‘n00b, you collapsed the wavefunction now! - RoadWarrior, on Schrödinger’s Cat Last edited by LoneWolf121188; 02-19-05 at 09:28 PM.
	QUOTE Thanks

02-19-05, 09:56 PM	#3
EvilCloudStrife R. Kelly is my roll model Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Mesa, Arizona	run cpu burn overnight with it.. he says that it is a long process, but worth it in the end... keep pushing it, it will turn! __________________ Name: Apocalypse Motherboard: DFI NF4 Ultra-D Bios 623-3 CPU: AMD 939 Opteron 148 CABYE 0536 & XP-120 W/ Sanyo Denki 120mm Fan - 11x264 - 2900Mhz - 1.52V - 25C Idle - 38C Load RAM: OCZ Gold Edition 2GB (2 x 1GB) - UCCC - 1:1 - 264Mhz - 3-4-3-8 - 2.68V Videocard: Evga 7800GT 256-P2-N518 (500/1200) DVD: NEC 16XDVD+/-RW Hard Drives: (1)Western Digital 7200 250GB 16MB SATA2, (2)Western Digital 7200 250GB 16MB SATA2, Western Digital 7200 200GB 8MB IDE, (1) Westen Digital 7200 250GB 2MB IDE, (2) Western Digital 7200 250GB 2MB IDE, (3) Removable Western Digital 7200 250GB 2MB USB2 Enclosure PSU: OCZ 520W SLI Powerstream Chuck Norris owns the greatest Poker Face of all-time. It helped him win the 1983 World Series of Poker despite him holding just a Joker, a Get out of Jail Free Monopoloy card, a 2 of clubs, 7 of spades and a green #4 card from the game UNO
	QUOTE Thanks

02-19-05, 10:14 PM	#4
darkknight187 Member Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Canton, PA	the numbers you give show a .3v lower core than stock, i would be mucho happy with that and start seeing what clocks/temps you can get with juice closer to stock....i believe in the "voodoo magic" that a burn in is....but i would think at such a undervolt you have hit your lowest wall but with that said it may be possible for you to oc it then over some time get it back down really low.....also if you don't already once you get er all steadied out take her to the folding team and crunch some bigpackets __________________ Intel i7 930 w/ Thermalright Ulra 120 extreme w/2x Scythe Slipstream Kaze 3x4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 MSI X58-A-GD45 XFX HD5870 @ stock Auzentech X-fi Forte (headphones : Audio Technica ATH-AD700's IEM's: Hi-Fi Man RE0's) PCP&P Silencer 750 (black) HDD1 OCZ Agility 60gb SSD HDD2 WDBlack 1tb HDD3 Seagate1.5tb OCForums Metal Club member #187 Heat
	QUOTE Thanks

02-19-05, 10:26 PM	#5
mudpark41 Member Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: New York	After burning for a good 20 hours I was able to go from 13 hour prime fail at 1.7 to a 20 hour prime fail at 1.675. I am running a XP chip but still... __________________ Main Rig: AMD Opteron 165 (CCBWE) (2.65ghz) (295 x 9) \| Thermalright XP-120 \| Sunon 110 cfm DFI UT LanParty nf4-D \| Antec Preformance PlusView Full ATX Case \| Hitachi 160 gigabyte Serial-Ata eVGA 7800 gt PCI-E \| Intel P4 Xeon U1 VGA Cooler (Diehrd) \| Zalman 5.1 Real Surround Headphones G.Skill Value 1gb DDR Ram (2-3-3-8) \| Ocz 520 watt Modstream Sli PSU Seconday Rig:AMD 2600+ M (IQYHA) (2.4ghz) (240 x 10) \| Thermalright Sp-97 Thermaltake SmartFan II \| Abit Nf7-S 2.0 (Merlin D27 BIOS) \| Generic X-Case Hitachi 80 gigabyte Serial-Ata in Raid 0 (readburst = 111meg/s) Msi 6600GT AGP \| Zalman Vf700-Cu VGA Cooler \| Sicuro 5.1 Gaming Surround Speakers Ultra Overclocking 512 DDR Ram \| Antec 400 watt Smart Power PSU
	QUOTE Thanks

Problems with Sentential's method of burning in (cant get the vcore any lower)

Internet Services

Website Development

Tech Hardware

02-20-05, 01:32 AM	#6
EspElement Member Join Date: Mar 2003	well this is wat happens to me... i got my 3000+ at 1.55v 250*10 = 2.5GHz and it runs prime for about 30 mins.. i run the test for 4 hours.. i got 1 hour and 30 mins.. then i ran it over night.. ran prime.. and in 2 hours my computer freezes i tried the same process over night.. ran it for 10 hours this time.. then tried again.. and it froze!! ugh then i tried again.. same thing! i agree it helped.. but why do u think im locking up?
	QUOTE Thanks

02-20-05, 09:10 AM	#9
darkknight187 Member Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Canton, PA	i would say if you can get it that low at near stock speeds she ought to OC like a mofo because you have a way higher safe range of voltages to try so good luck __________________ Intel i7 930 w/ Thermalright Ulra 120 extreme w/2x Scythe Slipstream Kaze 3x4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 MSI X58-A-GD45 XFX HD5870 @ stock Auzentech X-fi Forte (headphones : Audio Technica ATH-AD700's IEM's: Hi-Fi Man RE0's) PCP&P Silencer 750 (black) HDD1 OCZ Agility 60gb SSD HDD2 WDBlack 1tb HDD3 Seagate1.5tb OCForums Metal Club member #187 Heat
	QUOTE Thanks

02-20-05, 09:15 AM	Thread Starter #11
LoneWolf121188 Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Sheppard Air Force Base, TX	That didn't work. I'm at 220x11 now with 1.6125 on the vcore (1.648 from CPU-Z...that just a LITTLE off...). I'll drop it until Pime quits, then burn. __________________ mATX Desktop (Build Log Here): Core i7 3770K @ 4.9GHz 1.53V, Maximus V Gene, 16GB DDR3-1600 RipjawX, EVGA GTX780, Intel 520 240GB, Seagate 2TB, EK CPU and GPU waterblocks, MCP35X, 120.1 and 180.1 radiators Coming Soon: 4770K, Maximus VI Gene. 15" MacBook Pro: 2.66GHz Core i7 620M, 8GB DDR3, OCZ Vertex 2 120GB, 500GB Seagate 7200.4, GeForce 330M 512MB, OS X 10.8.2, Windows 7 x64 Asus Eee Slate EP121: 1.33GHz Core i5 470UM, 4GB DDR3, Intel 320 80GB, Windows 8 x64 The Hardware Destruction Thread\|OCForums Musicians Club Member -12\|OCForums Metal Club Member -12 Well, if he opens the box and its dead, then it would be his fault because the state of the cat is determined by the observer. Then we could be all ‘n00b, you collapsed the wavefunction now! - RoadWarrior, on Schrödinger’s Cat
	QUOTE Thanks

02-20-05, 09:27 AM	Thread Starter #13
LoneWolf121188 Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Sheppard Air Force Base, TX	Wow, check this out: 220x11 at 1.325 BIOS, 1.344 CPU-Z. At 1.3125, Windows would reboot at the loading screen. Time to run some CPU burn in. __________________ mATX Desktop (Build Log Here): Core i7 3770K @ 4.9GHz 1.53V, Maximus V Gene, 16GB DDR3-1600 RipjawX, EVGA GTX780, Intel 520 240GB, Seagate 2TB, EK CPU and GPU waterblocks, MCP35X, 120.1 and 180.1 radiators Coming Soon: 4770K, Maximus VI Gene. 15" MacBook Pro: 2.66GHz Core i7 620M, 8GB DDR3, OCZ Vertex 2 120GB, 500GB Seagate 7200.4, GeForce 330M 512MB, OS X 10.8.2, Windows 7 x64 Asus Eee Slate EP121: 1.33GHz Core i5 470UM, 4GB DDR3, Intel 320 80GB, Windows 8 x64 The Hardware Destruction Thread\|OCForums Musicians Club Member -12\|OCForums Metal Club Member -12 Well, if he opens the box and its dead, then it would be his fault because the state of the cat is determined by the observer. Then we could be all ‘n00b, you collapsed the wavefunction now! - RoadWarrior, on Schrödinger’s Cat
	QUOTE Thanks

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search