I have a question and I am looking for someone who has actually tried this approach.
I will be running a WaterChill kit with their 900 l/hr SACEM Pump, CPU and GPU blocks, and a pair of BIP3 rads.
I intend to run the components like this;
Pump > GPU > CPU > CPU outlets each at roughly half flow rate to the BIP3s in parellel > and "Y" back to the pump.
I would have prefered a pair of BIX2's but have to live with the two BIP3s I have on hand.
What I want to know is if the increased head-loss of the two rads will outweight the benefits of slowed flow-rate through seperate radiators.
I have seen some performance figures on radiators and typically they are done with a single component sytem, so when flow rates are lowered, the reduced flow rate also effects the water block performance and therefore the outcome of the tests.
If anyone has done this I would very much appreciate information about your results. Thanx.
I will be running a WaterChill kit with their 900 l/hr SACEM Pump, CPU and GPU blocks, and a pair of BIP3 rads.
I intend to run the components like this;
Pump > GPU > CPU > CPU outlets each at roughly half flow rate to the BIP3s in parellel > and "Y" back to the pump.
I would have prefered a pair of BIX2's but have to live with the two BIP3s I have on hand.
What I want to know is if the increased head-loss of the two rads will outweight the benefits of slowed flow-rate through seperate radiators.
I have seen some performance figures on radiators and typically they are done with a single component sytem, so when flow rates are lowered, the reduced flow rate also effects the water block performance and therefore the outcome of the tests.
If anyone has done this I would very much appreciate information about your results. Thanx.