- Joined
- Nov 27, 2004
- Location
- Port Richey/Tampa, FL
.... 
-
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
LOL 1668 hours prime stable celeron d
- Thread starter ryufreak
- Start date
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2005
ryufreak said:....
1 error in 1668 hours?? what a peice of crap!! /sarcasim
Im picky as all heck.. that 1 error would be in my dreams and id see it when i blinked untill i i made it run perfect!.. lol
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2005
ol' man said:
You ran prime for 70 days? Your pic says 40000 hours.
Guess again!
70 x 24hours = 1680 hours
try 1666 days! or better yet 4.54 years
- Joined
- May 10, 2004
he ran it for 22 minutes, the cpu is so buggy, that i thinks that it ran for years.
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2005
fAlCoNNiAn said:he ran it for 22 minutes, the cpu is so buggy, that i thinks that it ran for years.
first idea that was beleavable so far lol
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2004
- Location
- Denver, CO
Well the fact that he has CPU-Z Version 1.28.6 (newer than 40,000 hours) is a good indication it failed in 22 minutes
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2003
Sucka said:Well the fact that he has CPU-Z Version 1.28.6 (newer than 40,000 hours) is a good indication it failed in 22 minutes
Why couldn't he be running for 4 years, then download the latest version of CPU-Z and take that screenshot?
It's obvious that that it's just an error. Weird though.
The P4 has hardly been around 4 years, much less an E0 LGA775 Celeron.
OP
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2004
- Location
- Port Richey/Tampa, FL
- Thread Starter
- #11
lol, sorry 1668 days, i passed the 2 minutes and couldn't change the title when i realized that, and yah its probably a bug in prime, i did run it for 1-2 hours though Don't take it too seriously....
Don't take it too seriously....
- Joined
- May 10, 2004
ryufreak said:lol, sorry 1668 days, i passed the 2 minutes and couldn't change the title when i realized that, and yah its probably a bug in prime, i did run it for 1-2 hours though
its not prime that has the bug, but it the cpu.
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2004
why is that celeron underclocked?
- Joined
- May 10, 2004
SolidxSnake said:
its not..... look at the cpu-z screenie.
OP
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2004
- Location
- Port Richey/Tampa, FL
- Thread Starter
- #15
fAlCoNNiAn said:
I don't know about that, cpu seems pretty fine and stable to me.. I rebooted, ran prime again, and it went away, of course i got an error after about 5 hours, but still, i think prime just went haywire for that run
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2004
- Location
- The Netherlands
First bug in prime i have seen.
Give it some more juice and get that 40k hour stability
Give it some more juice and get that 40k hour stability
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2003
- Location
- Rio de Janeiro
The Computer time could have something to do with it, IE if you change the time and date, when prime fails it will 'think' its been running that long. - i think
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2002
- Location
- Austin, Texas
Now that's what I call stable.
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2003
- Location
- Rio de Janeiro
it does work then
