- Joined
- Nov 26, 2004
To those individuals with the Intel Pentium 4 Northwood 3.2GHz/512K/800F/478P-SL6WG processor seeking some additional information regarding the overclocking possibilities of such exceptionally engineered piece of hardware.
Knowing that the processor stock comes with the 16 x 200FSB = 3,200Mhz settings, I decided to purchase some good RAM and unleash all of the power. Special thanks to the Corsair XMS TWINX1024-3200C2PT 1GB (2 x 512MB) DDR 400 (PC 3200) Dual Channel Kit System Memory, I was able to bump my processor to a total of 16 x 231FSB = 3,696Mhz at a 1:1 ratio with timings set to 2-3-3-5
Note, that the memory was set to defaults at 1:1 200Mhz with timings set to 3-3-3-8. I went ahead and changed them to the defaults specified at Corsair and went on from there, 2-3-3-6.
After much research, I was able to figure out that the computer will boot maximum to a 16 x 237FSB = 3792Mhz on both 5:4 and 3:2 ratios. However, the computer would not boot to 16 x 238FSB = 3808Mhz on either 5:4 or 3:2, thus giving us the idea that most likely the maximum speed of the processor is almost a clock speed of 3,800Mhz.
Knowing that the RAM has some potential, I decided to start testing 1:1 right from the 238FSB. As many of you may imagine, 238, 237, 236 would not boot at all but once I reached the 235FSB level, I was able to boot into Windows XP Professional SP2 and do some testing.
I decided to test the RAM out through MemTest-86 v3.2 and through much testing, 235-232 testing gave errors but 231FSB looked like the sweet spot for the RAM on 1:1. Not only was this a great overclock of 496Mhz for the processor, but I had also achieved a 62Mhz overclock in terms of my RAM and I could not ask for anything more. I figured it wasn’t worth testing the stability on the 5:4 16 x 237 = 3,792Mhz because in reality, I would be only gaining a total of 96Mhz with my RAM running at 380Mhz (190Mhz per stick) instead of 400Mhz (200Mhz per stick).
At the end, it a far better choice to be running 496Mhz stronger with 64Mhz more RAM rather than benefiting 96Mhz in terms of the processor and loosing the 20Mhz of my RAM.
All of the testing was done via the specifications listed below in my signature. Hope this is of any help to anyone and good luck on the overclocking journey.
Knowing that the processor stock comes with the 16 x 200FSB = 3,200Mhz settings, I decided to purchase some good RAM and unleash all of the power. Special thanks to the Corsair XMS TWINX1024-3200C2PT 1GB (2 x 512MB) DDR 400 (PC 3200) Dual Channel Kit System Memory, I was able to bump my processor to a total of 16 x 231FSB = 3,696Mhz at a 1:1 ratio with timings set to 2-3-3-5
Note, that the memory was set to defaults at 1:1 200Mhz with timings set to 3-3-3-8. I went ahead and changed them to the defaults specified at Corsair and went on from there, 2-3-3-6.
After much research, I was able to figure out that the computer will boot maximum to a 16 x 237FSB = 3792Mhz on both 5:4 and 3:2 ratios. However, the computer would not boot to 16 x 238FSB = 3808Mhz on either 5:4 or 3:2, thus giving us the idea that most likely the maximum speed of the processor is almost a clock speed of 3,800Mhz.
Knowing that the RAM has some potential, I decided to start testing 1:1 right from the 238FSB. As many of you may imagine, 238, 237, 236 would not boot at all but once I reached the 235FSB level, I was able to boot into Windows XP Professional SP2 and do some testing.
I decided to test the RAM out through MemTest-86 v3.2 and through much testing, 235-232 testing gave errors but 231FSB looked like the sweet spot for the RAM on 1:1. Not only was this a great overclock of 496Mhz for the processor, but I had also achieved a 62Mhz overclock in terms of my RAM and I could not ask for anything more. I figured it wasn’t worth testing the stability on the 5:4 16 x 237 = 3,792Mhz because in reality, I would be only gaining a total of 96Mhz with my RAM running at 380Mhz (190Mhz per stick) instead of 400Mhz (200Mhz per stick).
At the end, it a far better choice to be running 496Mhz stronger with 64Mhz more RAM rather than benefiting 96Mhz in terms of the processor and loosing the 20Mhz of my RAM.
All of the testing was done via the specifications listed below in my signature. Hope this is of any help to anyone and good luck on the overclocking journey.