Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
jstutman said:128 is consided cd quality i believe. As far as i was aware. basically anything higher than that we cant tell anyway. Although, the amount or size of the file is not much more being 256.
Radical said:That depends on how the file is encoded, but 128 is almost never CD quality -- it is actually very far from it. A file ripped using WMP's "lossless" (theoretically no data is lost in the rip) mode should play at around 1000kbps, so that would be CD quality if the file was ripped with WMP. And it is very easy to tell the difference between a file ripped at 128kbps and that same file ripped at 320kbps.
If anything, I would be ripping my songs to higher than 256, not ripping them to 128. 128 is very low and really does not sound good.
jstutman said:Well i never said i was right. makes since tho. Never really checked, but indeed all my music is 320.
Bios24 said:Most people can not tell the difference beyond 128kbps. Yes, 128kbps is not '100% true cd quality', but it's good enough. I ripped all my music at 128kbps to help save space, and it sounds great. Try it at home: Take a song and rip it at 128/160/192/256 and see if you can tell the difference.