• Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!

5900vs 6600 non-gt vs 9800 pro vs x600 xt?

Overclockers is supported by our readers. When you click a link to make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn More.

herron

Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2005
5900 vs 6600 non-gtvs 9800 pro vs x600 xt what is better of :shrug: the 4?

plz list them in order from best to worst.
 
9800pro, 6600, 5900, x600xt

6600 non-gt will probly not beat a 9800pro. i would expect the 9800pro to come ahead
 
5900s suck. Plain and simple.

The 9800 pro is faster than the x600xt. (x600xt is a 9600xt in PCi-e)

6600 is a tad slower than the 9800.

6600gt is a bit faster than a 9800xt.

So. 5900 sucks, x600xt, 6600, 9800.

Done and done.
 
Haha, you're all wrong! =)

I have a 5900 (128MB) and a 6600 (256MB) and have benchmarked them side by side in the same comp. The 5900 ALWAYS wins by a comfortable margin (20-30%).

I think the 9800 pro would likely win.

The x600 would probably be last, x800 is a wonderful card, the x600 is a piece of crap.

So, I'd say: 9800 pro, 6600, 5900, x600.

Personally, I always buy nVidia (mostly for linux reasons). In linux, the order would be 5900, 6600, 9800 pro, x600.
 
Back