Overclockers

DaWiper · 08-13-05, 03:32 PM

Why? You may ask. There is already a super pi thread.
Well, after consulting sucka which consulted the hw-/mbot guy, linux results will not at the current time be added to the top 10 list due to unfair advantage. I'm not sure if this advantage applies to all cpus and 32-bit/64-bit enviroment, but this is what we are here to find out.

Download link:
ftp://pi.super-computing.org/Linux/super_pi.tar.gz

NEW LINK!!!!(updated 02.june 2007, pretty sure it's the same file)
http://www.di.uminho.pt/~apa/directo...uper_pi.tar.gz

How to use it:
1.Download
2.open a console window and enter the directory where super_pi.tar.gz is saved.
3.untar with "tar xvf super_pi.tar.gz"
4.enter the extract directory
5. run super pi with "sh super_pi 20"

20 means 20 bit number, which equals 1m
21 means 21 bit number, which equals 2m
25 means 25 bit number, which equals 32m

Please stick to 20(1m). Post a screenshot and info about cpu/speed/distro/32bit or 64bit

If there is enough interest I will try to maintain some sort of highscore list.

Have fun!

DaWiper · 08-13-05, 03:34 PM

Here's my first run:

25.587 secs.

3200+(venice) @ 2.7ghz. Mandriva x86_64(64bit)

Sucka · 08-13-05, 03:49 PM

Hope all those Linux users will post. I don't have Lunix, so no fun for me

L337 M33P · 08-13-05, 04:51 PM

Ere we go:

XP SP2:

Gentoo 2005.0 LiveCD:

Code:

 ------ Started super_pi run : Sat Aug 13 22:44:24 GMT 2005
 ------ Ended super_pi run : Sat Aug 13 22:45:09 GMT 2005
 Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
 Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
 f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
 pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
 compilation.
 Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
 End of initialization. Time=       0.611 Sec.
 I= 1 L=       0        Time=       1.943 Sec.
 I= 2 L=       0        Time=       2.234 Sec.
 I= 3 L=       1        Time=       2.230 Sec.
 I= 4 L=       2        Time=       2.234 Sec.
 I= 5 L=       5        Time=       2.232 Sec.
 I= 6 L=      10        Time=       2.230 Sec.
 I= 7 L=      21        Time=       2.235 Sec.
 I= 8 L=      43        Time=       2.235 Sec.
 I= 9 L=      87        Time=       2.234 Sec.
 I=10 L=     174        Time=       2.231 Sec.
 I=11 L=     349        Time=       2.232 Sec.
 I=12 L=     698        Time=       2.228 Sec.
 I=13 L=    1396        Time=       2.220 Sec.
 I=14 L=    2794        Time=       2.227 Sec.
 I=15 L=    5588        Time=       2.227 Sec.
 I=16 L=   11176        Time=       2.215 Sec.
 I=17 L=   22353        Time=       2.190 Sec.
 I=18 L=   44707        Time=       2.121 Sec.
 I=19 L=   89415        Time=       1.967 Sec.
 End of main loop
 End of calculation.    Time=      44.043 Sec.
 End of data output.    Time=       0.194 Sec.
 Total calculation(I/O) time=      44.237(       1.323) Sec.

XP1800 @ 9.5x200, 2-3-3-11 1T

I'd try it on my future PVR but it hasn't got a motherboard at the minute

And my IRC server will probably take about 2 hours to do 1M.

DaWiper · 08-13-05, 04:57 PM

8 secs. faster in linux. Impressive.
Looks like linux gives a advantage for both 32bit/64bit.

DaWiper · 08-13-05, 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sucka

Hope all those Linux users will post. I don't have Lunix, so no fun for me

Why not get a live-cd? Run linux straight from a cd. No installation required.

Sucka · 08-13-05, 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaWiper

Why not get a live-cd? Run linux straight from a cd. No installation required.

I know little to nothing about Linux, and i don't really want to clutter your thread with noob questions on Linux

I wouldn't mind setting up a Linux partition. Maybe a trip to alternitive OS forum will yeild me some information. Thanks.

electrorcamd · 08-15-05, 01:44 PM

This is while I was folding, so it is slower than it could be:
Arch Linux, Sempron 2200+ (socket a) @ 1908MHz, 213x9

42.906 seconds, Windows would run about 48 seconds wo/ folding at this speed.

speed bump · 08-17-05, 01:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sucka

I know little to nothing about Linux, and i don't really want to clutter your thread with noob questions on Linux

I wouldn't mind setting up a Linux partition. Maybe a trip to alternitive OS forum will yeild me some information. Thanks.

Linux is very easy to start Kaltag has all you need to do in the his alt os section sticky. Download and OS burn it and your ready to go basically. Only weird thing about Linux is you have to get used to single clicking and it doesn't play super well with NTFS.

I remember someone at XS getting like a 13 second superpi time on linux so it definetly more effiecient.

notbad · 05-22-06, 10:59 PM

this thread is old im not scared though i'll post anyway

oh btw is my score good?

AMD64 3000 "newcastle"
Fedora 5 x86-64

I= 2 L= 0 Time= 2.032 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 2.024 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 2.040 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 2.020 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 2.028 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 2.032 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 2.020 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 2.032 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 2.028 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 2.024 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 2.032 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 2.020 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 2.032 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 2.012 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.996 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.984 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.924 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.816 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 41.235 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.180 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 41.415( 1.192) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Mon May 22 23:51:07 EDT 2006

Milos_SD · 08-04-06, 06:24 AM

Intel Celeron D336 2.8Ghz
Ubuntu 6.06 32bit

aaa · 08-04-06, 08:03 AM

For kicks I did it on a 900mhz P3

I'll post a real one eventually.

PowersurgeX · 08-20-06, 02:09 PM

24.6 on the system in my sig. I'm using gentoo with the ck-sources 2.6.17-r2.

caater · 08-21-06, 08:10 AM

core2duo (conroe) e6600 @ 3726, 2x1g ram @ 4-3-3-4 - 9.990sec

OS- ubuntu linux (dunno exact ver). didn't know how to increase process priority and how to start without X.
also installed the whole thing instead of core packages.. i'm a linux nub

xTrEmEoVrClOcKr · 08-28-06, 12:52 PM

You have a world record E6600

, if you were running windows

. Nice scores everybody.

Mixy · 10-03-06, 06:09 AM

Hi

The link is broken. Anyone have a working mirror? Or if someone could care to send it to me (mixy**8**9*@*gmail.**com without the *). I would just love to compare with windows

Thanks

notbad · 11-06-06, 11:43 PM

crzy score cater 9.+ seconds!! wow

lol i just got 31
X2 4200 @ 2.3ghz
PCLinuxOS
31.219 Sec.

ewinands · 11-25-06, 04:07 PM

------ Started super_pi run : Sat Nov 25 22:55:11 CET 2006
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.424 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.316 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.500 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.492 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.496 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.496 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.492 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.492 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.500 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.492 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.496 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.496 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.492 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.492 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.488 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.488 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.480 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.448 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.400 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.308 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 29.454 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.180 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 29.634( 0.856) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Sat Nov 25 22:55:41 CET 2006

P4 3.0 ghz 512mb ram on IBM X Server

Bornerdogge · 02-22-07, 03:48 PM

hello,
I've got a problem with the command "sh super_pi 20"
he tells me "1: ./pi not found".

Then I've changed the "super_pi" file and written "sh pi $1"...
now he tells me "pi: 1: Syntax error: "(" unexpected"

I get the same when I give the command "sh pi 20"

I'm under Kubuntu 6.10 "Edgy Eft" for AMD64

what should I do??

4od · 05-30-07, 05:25 PM

e6400 @ 3.2ghz 1.425vcore

21.581 seconds

Ubuntu 7.04

UltraSPARC · 06-02-07, 02:24 PM

Results on the T5200 1.6 GHz C2D in my Toshiba R20.

28s isn't bad at all for this speed, this is pretty nice.

Running on Ubuntu 7.04 i386, 32-bit. I have to try the 64-bit sometime, might gain some performance.

DaWiper · 06-02-07, 04:28 PM

First post updated with new link

4od · 06-10-07, 05:50 PM

Bumped the e6400 up to 3.6 just to try this....

12.455 seconds

Does anyone know why the first iteration is fastest and each consecutive one is slower?

bobrzloy · 06-14-07, 11:50 PM

Core2Duo T7200
Gentoo 32bit

Code:

$ sh super_pi 20
 Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
 ------ Started super_pi run : Ïòí - Èþí - 15 12:21:06 KRAST 2007
 Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
 End of initialization. Time=       0.327 Sec.
 I= 1 L=       0        Time=       0.877 Sec.
 I= 2 L=       0        Time=       0.997 Sec.
 I= 3 L=       1        Time=       0.997 Sec.
 I= 4 L=       2        Time=       1.000 Sec.
 I= 5 L=       5        Time=       1.000 Sec.
 I= 6 L=      10        Time=       0.997 Sec.
 I= 7 L=      21        Time=       1.010 Sec.
 I= 8 L=      43        Time=       0.997 Sec.
 I= 9 L=      87        Time=       1.000 Sec.
 I=10 L=     174        Time=       1.000 Sec.
 I=11 L=     349        Time=       0.997 Sec.
 I=12 L=     698        Time=       0.997 Sec.
 I=13 L=    1396        Time=       0.997 Sec.
 I=14 L=    2794        Time=       0.993 Sec.
 I=15 L=    5588        Time=       0.993 Sec.
 I=16 L=   11176        Time=       0.983 Sec.
 I=17 L=   22353        Time=       0.980 Sec.
 I=18 L=   44707        Time=       0.933 Sec.
 I=19 L=   89415        Time=       0.870 Sec.
 End of main loop
 End of calculation.    Time=      19.709 Sec.
 End of data output.    Time=       0.130 Sec.
 Total calculation(I/O) time=      19.839(       0.713) Sec.
 ------ Ended super_pi run : Ïòí - Èþí - 15 12:21:25 KRAST 2007

SirShaggy · 11-12-07, 02:05 PM

I know this is an older thread, I just put an old PC back into use and thought I'd try it out. I ended up with 35.062, not too bad for a 2003 system I guess.....

luke1105 · 11-28-07, 09:20 PM

hi all.
anyone has the superpi 1.5 source code?
i've google it, but i cant find it.

zoe · 04-02-08, 02:47 PM

whoohoo! Now I can benchmark with those XP kids.

------ Started super_pi run : Wed Apr 2 12:24:31 PDT 2008
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 4.944 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 15.369 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 17.713 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 17.429 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 17.189 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 17.269 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 17.369 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 17.369 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 17.389 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 17.149 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 17.209 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 17.357 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 17.405 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 17.373 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 17.257 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 16.893 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 15.989 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 16.517 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 16.581 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 15.381 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 340.845 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 1.688 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 342.533( 12.101) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Wed Apr 2 12:35:35 PDT 2008

Also, 600.99 bogomips according to /proc/cpuinfo

PII 300MHz / 192MB SDRAM / Debian sid

El<(')>Maxi · 04-02-08, 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by luke1105

hi all.
anyone has the superpi 1.5 source code?
i've google it, but i cant find it.

You could try a PM to snq @ XS, although he hasn't been around for some time.

Digitaldoug · 06-04-08, 05:38 AM

time pi 20
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Wed Jun 4 17:17:00 ICT 2008
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.184 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 0.540 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 0.620 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 0.620 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 0.624 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 0.616 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 0.620 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 0.620 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 0.616 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 0.624 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 0.616 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 0.624 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 0.616 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 0.624 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 0.616 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 0.616 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 0.608 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 0.600 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 0.584 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 0.548 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 12.213 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.076 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 12.289( 0.380) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Wed Jun 4 17:17:12 ICT 2008

real 0m12.306s
user 0m11.921s
sys 0m0.368s
uname -a
Linux GigaHardy 2.6.24-17-generic #1 SMP Thu May 1 13:57:17 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux
cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E6750 @ 2.66GHz
stepping : 11
cpu MHz : 3199.999
cache size : 4096 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 2
core id : 0
cpu cores : 2
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good pni monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
bogomips : 6404.01
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

Nothing special except my RAM is 6,6,6,18 @ 400Mhz.
I am a little suprised how fast, because on WinXP (same computer) the time is about 16.8 seconds.

primulis · 07-31-08, 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bornerdogge

hello,
I've got a problem with the command "sh super_pi 20"
he tells me "1: ./pi not found".

Then I've changed the "super_pi" file and written "sh pi $1"...
now he tells me "pi: 1: Syntax error: "(" unexpected"

I get the same when I give the command "sh pi 20"

I'm under Kubuntu 6.10 "Edgy Eft" for AMD64

what should I do??

It's can't be run in 64x without emulation. I have this problem too.

08-13-05, 03:34 PM	#2
DaWiper Image Compare Man Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Norway	Here's my first run: 25.587 secs. 3200+(venice) @ 2.7ghz. Mandriva x86_64(64bit) __________________ MSI Neo2 Platinium + "X2 3800+" 2x1 GB Corsair value EVGA 7800gs co - Xfi extreme music ---It's not about being the best, it's about being better than the rest--- --- AMIGA 4EVER! ---

08-13-05, 03:49 PM	#3
Sucka Member Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Denver, CO	Hope all those Linux users will post. I don't have Lunix, so no fun for me __________________ DFI SLI-DR \| Opteron 170 \| 2x512 G.Skill LE \| x1900XTX \| 2x250GB T7K250 RAID 0 \| PCP&C 510 SLI \| X-Fi \| Dell 2007FPW Laptop \| Dell E1405 \| Core Duo 2 Merom T7200 \| 2GB DDR2 \| Intel 950GM \| 120GB HD \| 14.1 in. WXGA+ Truelife \| XP Pro Heatware

08-13-05, 04:57 PM	#5
DaWiper Image Compare Man Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Norway	8 secs. faster in linux. Impressive. Looks like linux gives a advantage for both 32bit/64bit. __________________ MSI Neo2 Platinium + "X2 3800+" 2x1 GB Corsair value EVGA 7800gs co - Xfi extreme music ---It's not about being the best, it's about being better than the rest--- --- AMIGA 4EVER! ---

08-15-05, 01:44 PM	#8
electrorcamd Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Folding for T32 @ CWRU	This is while I was folding, so it is slower than it could be: Arch Linux, Sempron 2200+ (socket a) @ 1908MHz, 213x9 42.906 seconds, Windows would run about 48 seconds wo/ folding at this speed. __________________ Main: Athlon 2 X3 435 @ 3.2GHz quad core, 4GB Crucial Ballistix Tracer DDR3, Asus M4A785TD-V evo mobo, HD4200 graphics, stock cooling, Enermax 420W psu Laptop: HP Pavilion dv5000, Turion64 ML-37, 1GB RAM, Xpress 200M graphics, 80GB hdd, XP MCE 2005 Old Main: AMD Sempron64 3000+ @ 2.4GHz, 1GB PC3200 Thermaltake Big Typhoon, Chaintech VNF3-250, GeForce FX5700LE with VF700-AlCu Server: Duron 1600 @ 1900ish, AN35N Ultra, 256MB PC2700 Centon, ATi Rage 128 @ stock, FreeBSD Folder: Sempron 2200+ @ 2GHz, AN35N Ultra, 512MB PC3200 Centon, Sapphire ATi Radeon 9250 Folding for T32

08-04-06, 06:24 AM	#11
Milos_SD New Member Join Date: Aug 2006	Intel Celeron D336 2.8Ghz Ubuntu 6.06 32bit Attached Images Last edited by Milos_SD; 08-04-06 at 06:29 AM.

Overclockers

Internet Services

Website Development

Tech Hardware

08-13-05, 03:32 PM	#1
DaWiper Image Compare Man Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Norway	The linux SUPER PI thread! Why? You may ask. There is already a super pi thread. Well, after consulting sucka which consulted the hw-/mbot guy, linux results will not at the current time be added to the top 10 list due to unfair advantage. I'm not sure if this advantage applies to all cpus and 32-bit/64-bit enviroment, but this is what we are here to find out. Download link: ftp://pi.super-computing.org/Linux/super_pi.tar.gz NEW LINK!!!!(updated 02.june 2007, pretty sure it's the same file) http://www.di.uminho.pt/~apa/directo...uper_pi.tar.gz How to use it: 1.Download 2.open a console window and enter the directory where super_pi.tar.gz is saved. 3.untar with "tar xvf super_pi.tar.gz" 4.enter the extract directory 5. run super pi with "sh super_pi 20" 20 means 20 bit number, which equals 1m 21 means 21 bit number, which equals 2m 25 means 25 bit number, which equals 32m Please stick to 20(1m). Post a screenshot and info about cpu/speed/distro/32bit or 64bit If there is enough interest I will try to maintain some sort of highscore list. Have fun! __________________ MSI Neo2 Platinium + "X2 3800+" 2x1 GB Corsair value EVGA 7800gs co - Xfi extreme music ---It's not about being the best, it's about being better than the rest--- --- AMIGA 4EVER! --- Last edited by DaWiper; 06-02-07 at 04:27 PM.

05-22-06, 10:59 PM	#10
notbad New Member Join Date: May 2006	this thread is old im not scared though i'll post anyway oh btw is my score good? AMD64 3000 "newcastle" Fedora 5 x86-64 I= 2 L= 0 Time= 2.032 Sec. I= 3 L= 1 Time= 2.024 Sec. I= 4 L= 2 Time= 2.040 Sec. I= 5 L= 5 Time= 2.020 Sec. I= 6 L= 10 Time= 2.028 Sec. I= 7 L= 21 Time= 2.032 Sec. I= 8 L= 43 Time= 2.020 Sec. I= 9 L= 87 Time= 2.032 Sec. I=10 L= 174 Time= 2.028 Sec. I=11 L= 349 Time= 2.024 Sec. I=12 L= 698 Time= 2.032 Sec. I=13 L= 1396 Time= 2.020 Sec. I=14 L= 2794 Time= 2.032 Sec. I=15 L= 5588 Time= 2.012 Sec. I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.996 Sec. I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.984 Sec. I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.924 Sec. I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.816 Sec. End of main loop End of calculation. Time= 41.235 Sec. End of data output. Time= 0.180 Sec. Total calculation(I/O) time= 41.415( 1.192) Sec. ------ Ended super_pi run : Mon May 22 23:51:07 EDT 2006

08-04-06, 08:03 AM	#12
aaa Member Join Date: Jun 2006	For kicks I did it on a 900mhz P3 I'll post a real one eventually. Attached Images

08-20-06, 02:09 PM	#13
PowersurgeX New Member Join Date: Jul 2006	24.6 on the system in my sig. I'm using gentoo with the ck-sources 2.6.17-r2. __________________ The only one that counts System: ______________________________________________ AM2 4600+ @ 2844 (237x12) 1.565 vcore 2x 1GB Patriot 6400 @ 825 3-3-3-5 2.2v Asus m2n-sli deluxe evga 7950gx2 wd raptor 150GB lian li mid tower(I don't remember which one) ocz 700w sli Cooling: ______________________________________________ Swiftech storm rev. 2 Swiftech mc655 Big frigging waterblock. mct-5 2 x sunon 120mm on the water block + 1 x generic 120mm blowing on the mobo heatpipe

08-21-06, 08:10 AM	#14
caater Member Join Date: Jan 2002	core2duo (conroe) e6600 @ 3726, 2x1g ram @ 4-3-3-4 - 9.990sec OS- ubuntu linux (dunno exact ver). didn't know how to increase process priority and how to start without X. also installed the whole thing instead of core packages.. i'm a linux nub

08-28-06, 12:52 PM	#15
xTrEmEoVrClOcKr member Join Date: May 2004 Location: San Diego, CA	You have a world record E6600 , if you were running windows . Nice scores everybody. __________________ Budget Build: \| Q8200 \| Asus P5QL-E \| 4GB (2x2GB) GSKILL PC6400 \| PowerColor 4830 512MB @ 650 / 1900 \|

10-03-06, 06:09 AM	#16
Mixy New Member Join Date: Oct 2006	Hi The link is broken. Anyone have a working mirror? Or if someone could care to send it to me (mixy89@gmail.*com without the ). I would just love to compare with windows Thanks

11-06-06, 11:43 PM	#17
notbad New Member Join Date: May 2006	crzy score cater 9.+ seconds!! wow lol i just got 31 X2 4200 @ 2.3ghz PCLinuxOS 31.219 Sec. Last edited by notbad; 11-09-06 at 08:23 AM.

11-25-06, 04:07 PM	#18
ewinands New Member Join Date: Nov 2006	Superpi on Linux ------ Started super_pi run : Sat Nov 25 22:55:11 CET 2006 Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits End of initialization. Time= 0.424 Sec. I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.316 Sec. I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.500 Sec. I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.492 Sec. I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.496 Sec. I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.496 Sec. I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.492 Sec. I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.492 Sec. I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.500 Sec. I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.492 Sec. I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.496 Sec. I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.496 Sec. I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.492 Sec. I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.492 Sec. I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.488 Sec. I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.488 Sec. I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.480 Sec. I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.448 Sec. I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.400 Sec. I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.308 Sec. End of main loop End of calculation. Time= 29.454 Sec. End of data output. Time= 0.180 Sec. Total calculation(I/O) time= 29.634( 0.856) Sec. ------ Ended super_pi run : Sat Nov 25 22:55:41 CET 2006 P4 3.0 ghz 512mb ram on IBM X Server

02-22-07, 03:48 PM	#19
Bornerdogge New Member Join Date: Feb 2007	hello, I've got a problem with the command "sh super_pi 20" he tells me "1: ./pi not found". Then I've changed the "super_pi" file and written "sh pi $1"... now he tells me "pi: 1: Syntax error: "(" unexpected" I get the same when I give the command "sh pi 20" I'm under Kubuntu 6.10 "Edgy Eft" for AMD64 what should I do??

05-30-07, 05:25 PM	#20
4od Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Westchester, NY	e6400 @ 3.2ghz 1.425vcore 21.581 seconds Ubuntu 7.04 __________________ Gigabyte DS3 v1.3 E6400 @ 3.8 @ 1.425 BFG 8800GTS G92 @ stock for now 4x1GB OCZ Reapers (D9's) @ stock for now Hitachi SCSI 15kRPM 36.7GB (Ultra320) Seagate SCSI 10kRPM 17.0GB (Ultra160) Maxtor IDE 7200RPM 75.4GB (ATA133) Apogee Classic, Maze4, MCW30, MCR320, 3x Yate Loon Medium Speed, MCP655, MCRES Heavily Modded Lian-Li A05B

06-02-07, 02:24 PM	#21
UltraSPARC New Member Join Date: Jun 2007	Results on the T5200 1.6 GHz C2D in my Toshiba R20. 28s isn't bad at all for this speed, this is pretty nice. Running on Ubuntu 7.04 i386, 32-bit. I have to try the 64-bit sometime, might gain some performance.

06-02-07, 04:28 PM	#22
DaWiper Image Compare Man Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Norway	First post updated with new link __________________ MSI Neo2 Platinium + "X2 3800+" 2x1 GB Corsair value EVGA 7800gs co - Xfi extreme music ---It's not about being the best, it's about being better than the rest--- --- AMIGA 4EVER! ---

06-10-07, 05:50 PM	#23
4od Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Westchester, NY	Bumped the e6400 up to 3.6 just to try this.... 12.455 seconds Does anyone know why the first iteration is fastest and each consecutive one is slower? __________________ Gigabyte DS3 v1.3 E6400 @ 3.8 @ 1.425 BFG 8800GTS G92 @ stock for now 4x1GB OCZ Reapers (D9's) @ stock for now Hitachi SCSI 15kRPM 36.7GB (Ultra320) Seagate SCSI 10kRPM 17.0GB (Ultra160) Maxtor IDE 7200RPM 75.4GB (ATA133) Apogee Classic, Maze4, MCW30, MCR320, 3x Yate Loon Medium Speed, MCP655, MCRES Heavily Modded Lian-Li A05B Last edited by 4od; 06-10-07 at 06:01 PM.

11-12-07, 02:05 PM	#25
SirShaggy New Member Join Date: Nov 2007	My shot at it....... I know this is an older thread, I just put an old PC back into use and thought I'd try it out. I ended up with 35.062, not too bad for a 2003 system I guess..... Attached Images __________________ Abit NF7-S V.2 Motherboard, AMD Athlon XP-M 2800+ CPU, Thermalright SI-97a heatsink with 92mm Panaflo fan, Corsair XMS TwinXPC3200-C2PT 2x512MB RAM, XFX 6800GT 256MB AGP Video Card, Sound Blaster Audigy 2 Platinum 5.1 ch. sound card, D-Link DWL-AG530 wireless card. OC = 218x11.5=2507

11-28-07, 09:20 PM	#26
luke1105 New Member Join Date: Nov 2007	hi all. anyone has the superpi 1.5 source code? i've google it, but i cant find it.

04-02-08, 02:47 PM	#27
zoe New Member Join Date: Apr 2008	whoohoo! Now I can benchmark with those XP kids. ------ Started super_pi run : Wed Apr 2 12:24:31 PDT 2008 Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits End of initialization. Time= 4.944 Sec. I= 1 L= 0 Time= 15.369 Sec. I= 2 L= 0 Time= 17.713 Sec. I= 3 L= 1 Time= 17.429 Sec. I= 4 L= 2 Time= 17.189 Sec. I= 5 L= 5 Time= 17.269 Sec. I= 6 L= 10 Time= 17.369 Sec. I= 7 L= 21 Time= 17.369 Sec. I= 8 L= 43 Time= 17.389 Sec. I= 9 L= 87 Time= 17.149 Sec. I=10 L= 174 Time= 17.209 Sec. I=11 L= 349 Time= 17.357 Sec. I=12 L= 698 Time= 17.405 Sec. I=13 L= 1396 Time= 17.373 Sec. I=14 L= 2794 Time= 17.257 Sec. I=15 L= 5588 Time= 16.893 Sec. I=16 L= 11176 Time= 15.989 Sec. I=17 L= 22353 Time= 16.517 Sec. I=18 L= 44707 Time= 16.581 Sec. I=19 L= 89415 Time= 15.381 Sec. End of main loop End of calculation. Time= 340.845 Sec. End of data output. Time= 1.688 Sec. Total calculation(I/O) time= 342.533( 12.101) Sec. ------ Ended super_pi run : Wed Apr 2 12:35:35 PDT 2008 Also, 600.99 bogomips according to /proc/cpuinfo PII 300MHz / 192MB SDRAM / Debian sid

06-04-08, 05:38 AM	#29
Digitaldoug New Member Join Date: Jun 2008	time pi 20 Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually. pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the compilation. ------ Started super_pi run : Wed Jun 4 17:17:00 ICT 2008 Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits End of initialization. Time= 0.184 Sec. I= 1 L= 0 Time= 0.540 Sec. I= 2 L= 0 Time= 0.620 Sec. I= 3 L= 1 Time= 0.620 Sec. I= 4 L= 2 Time= 0.624 Sec. I= 5 L= 5 Time= 0.616 Sec. I= 6 L= 10 Time= 0.620 Sec. I= 7 L= 21 Time= 0.620 Sec. I= 8 L= 43 Time= 0.616 Sec. I= 9 L= 87 Time= 0.624 Sec. I=10 L= 174 Time= 0.616 Sec. I=11 L= 349 Time= 0.624 Sec. I=12 L= 698 Time= 0.616 Sec. I=13 L= 1396 Time= 0.624 Sec. I=14 L= 2794 Time= 0.616 Sec. I=15 L= 5588 Time= 0.616 Sec. I=16 L= 11176 Time= 0.608 Sec. I=17 L= 22353 Time= 0.600 Sec. I=18 L= 44707 Time= 0.584 Sec. I=19 L= 89415 Time= 0.548 Sec. End of main loop End of calculation. Time= 12.213 Sec. End of data output. Time= 0.076 Sec. Total calculation(I/O) time= 12.289( 0.380) Sec. ------ Ended super_pi run : Wed Jun 4 17:17:12 ICT 2008 real 0m12.306s user 0m11.921s sys 0m0.368s uname -a Linux GigaHardy 2.6.24-17-generic #1 SMP Thu May 1 13:57:17 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 15 model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E6750 @ 2.66GHz stepping : 11 cpu MHz : 3199.999 cache size : 4096 KB physical id : 0 siblings : 2 core id : 0 cpu cores : 2 fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 10 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good pni monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm bogomips : 6404.01 clflush size : 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management: Nothing special except my RAM is 6,6,6,18 @ 400Mhz. I am a little suprised how fast, because on WinXP (same computer) the time is about 16.8 seconds.