- Joined
- Aug 11, 2005
- Location
- Irvine, CA
I overclocked my 3200+ to 2.5Ghz. I have Corsair Valueselect so I'm using a 6"5 divider. I'm also running with a 4x LDT multiplier. Anywayz, I have 1GB of the memory and a 6600GT.
OK, straight to the point, Sandra tells me I'm running better than a 3.8GHz P4 570. Thats the good part. Now for the bad part. Before overclocking, 3DMark05 was giving a score of ~3200. After overclocking, my score increased to ~3500. Thats only a 300 point score increase.
I'm wondering, shouldn't the increase in performance a more than this? Or is something with my hardware bottlenecking, like my video card? Because after getting the 6600GT, my 3DMark03 score doubled. If my computer is running better than a FX-53 and better than a 3.8Ghz P4, shouldn't it be performing better?
OK, straight to the point, Sandra tells me I'm running better than a 3.8GHz P4 570. Thats the good part. Now for the bad part. Before overclocking, 3DMark05 was giving a score of ~3200. After overclocking, my score increased to ~3500. Thats only a 300 point score increase.
I'm wondering, shouldn't the increase in performance a more than this? Or is something with my hardware bottlenecking, like my video card? Because after getting the 6600GT, my 3DMark03 score doubled. If my computer is running better than a FX-53 and better than a 3.8Ghz P4, shouldn't it be performing better?