-
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
Overcloced Cely 65nm @ 5.0GHZ 1.456v 65nm Rules!
- Thread starter Nasgul
- Start date
- Joined
- May 26, 2004
- Location
- San Diego, CA
Yep, great budget CPU.
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2002
happy holidays from intel
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2004
- Location
- Grande Prairie, AB, Can.
holy crap. 28S superpi from a budget celeron. very impressive 
- Joined
- May 10, 2004
daddy wants 65nm
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2004
- Location
- The Netherlands
*blink*
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2005
- Location
- NewYork, NY
Wow....... I guess the name Celly won't be chastised anymore! So the chip it beat was $800+ overclocked?
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2003
- Location
- SF Bay Area
Yeah, $800 overclocked a year and a half ago.Jame Gumb said:
I won't deny that the result is quite impressive, but the comparison is senseless. As far as I'm concerned, all it shows is how weak the Celeron is clock-for-clock...any 6xx could beat that well over half a GHz slower.
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2003
Gautam said:
Exactly, like when hey were comparin 7800GTX' to the x800 line of cards.
Maybe compare it to the FX-60 if / when it comes out but this is Intels new line - compare it to AMD's new line.
3DFlyer
Banned
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2005
- Location
- The Cockpit
hahaha ...and people were bragging not one week ago that these new CPU's wouldn't be able to spank those overpriced AMD's.
AMD just got owned again. Regardless of the cooling, regardless of the performance per clock, nothing you can do to that AMD will make it perform better than these new CPU's.
I bet it's not gonna be a week before Ruiz and the rest of the crybabies have some excuse on their website about that.
I am loving every minute of this. AMD is getting served. They went teasing the Lion and now they are getting eaten alive, and there's nothing they can do to stop it. They best kick Ruiz out on his ear and get somebody in there with some sense, and start making some ammends real quickly, or they won't make it out of this alive.
I said this was gonna happen 3 months ago, and people on here were flaming me right and left calling me a fanboi and everything else. Well, to those people, I can only say "I told you so!" I even remember saying "Remember that I said this, because it WILL happen". Believe me now?
AMD just got owned again. Regardless of the cooling, regardless of the performance per clock, nothing you can do to that AMD will make it perform better than these new CPU's.
I bet it's not gonna be a week before Ruiz and the rest of the crybabies have some excuse on their website about that.
I am loving every minute of this. AMD is getting served. They went teasing the Lion and now they are getting eaten alive, and there's nothing they can do to stop it. They best kick Ruiz out on his ear and get somebody in there with some sense, and start making some ammends real quickly, or they won't make it out of this alive.
I said this was gonna happen 3 months ago, and people on here were flaming me right and left calling me a fanboi and everything else. Well, to those people, I can only say "I told you so!" I even remember saying "Remember that I said this, because it WILL happen". Believe me now?
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2003
- Location
- South of Boston
3DFlyer said:
you don't have a clue of which you speak. amd will not be owned by netburst. just because a ES celeron cedar mill clocked up to 5ghz doesn't mean amd is in trouble. a64s will still have an edge on cedar mill, and x2 will spank presler. using superpi (a benchmark that intel has the edge in, and is unapplicable to the real world) to compare a celeron to a fx53 is the most ridiculous thing i've ever heard of. you latching onto that makes second. stop patting yourself on the back.
ps why must you flame bait in every thread trying to give us info about new intel chips?
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2005
crimedog said:
I thought that the new 65nm chips did not include netburst architecture.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
-GearShift3r
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2003
- Location
- South of Boston
GearShift3r said:
you are wrong
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2004
- Location
- The Netherlands
GearShift3r said:
Netburst isn't a 'thing' you do or do not include, it's an architecture which goes like:
IF ipc = high OR clockspeed = low
THEN lower ipc OR increase clockspeed
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2005
- Location
- Hillsworth
Netburst won't leave until Conroe drops. Last I read, anyway.
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2003
- Location
- South of Boston
{o} said:
yohan is coming out real soon with the cedar mills and preslers, while conroe is some time late next year. cedar mill and presler should be the last chips with the netburst architecture.
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2005
- Location
- Hillsworth
crimedog said:
Hehe, you quoted me before I yanked out the Yonah part. I just realized Yonah and Dothan aren't even Netburst at all.
