Notices

Overclockers Forums > Hardware > CPUs > Intel CPUs
Intel CPUs
Forum Jump

Sen's Pentium D 920 Review

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe Search this Thread
 
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-10-06, 11:38 AM Thread Starter   #1
Sentential
Contributing Member

 
Sentential's Avatar 

Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Jacksonville, FL

 
Sen's Pentium D 920 Review


By popular demand Ive split my posts into a new thread. My intent as always with reviews is not to show off how 'cool' this chip is or isnt. This is to show the average joe what you can expect if you buy a chip right off the shelf.

As always overclocking will never be done on exotic cooling. No suicide shots, no box fans. This is being tested in an 30C (80F) room in a closed enviroment on a 24/7 box that I use for work as well as games

Here's my chip info:

Purchased from: Mwave.com

PROD CODE: BX80553920SL94S
MM#: 878915
FPO/BATCH: L541B380
Version #: 042731-001 1.3v MAX
Pack Date: 12/22/05

Testing box:

OCZ 520W Powerstream (33A 12v+)
Pentium D 920 (Cooled with an XP120)
Asus P5WD2 Premium @ BIOS 0606
Mushkin PC6400 (2GB)
ATi X800PRO (w/t Zalman VF700)

Picture of the testing box:



Pictures of the packaging and included items:









Intel 920 side by side my AthlonXP 1800+

__________________
Coolermaster 690II Advanced | Corsair 1000W
Creative X-FI Titanium Fatal1ty Pro
Intel i5 2500K (4.5ghz @ 1.33v)Corsair H100
PNY GTX 470 SLI SLi
Asus P8Z68-V Pro
Intel 320 SSD SATAII 2 X 120GB Raid 0
Kingston HyperX (4x4096MB)(8-8-9-28 @ 1600mhz @ 1.5v)

Heatware: 13-0-0

Last edited by Sentential; 01-10-06 at 12:40 PM.
Sentential is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 01-10-06, 11:42 AM Thread Starter   #2
Sentential
Contributing Member

 
Sentential's Avatar 

Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Jacksonville, FL

 
Scaling Results


Cooling XP120 w/t High Speed TFB Delta Fan

1.3v @ 2800mhz / 42-43C Load Temp (default)
1.3v @~3900mhz / 45-46C Load Temp (max for default vcore)
1.3v @ 4000mhz / 47-49C Load Temp (boots but crashes)

1.41v @ 4200mhz / 62-64C Load Temp (suicide max limited by heat)

1.37v @ ~4100mhz / 63-67C Load Temp (maximum stable freq) *subject to change

***Forced to reduce voltage again***
1.33v @ 4014 / 54-58C



Max Default Voltage: 1.3v
Max voltage for air cooling: 1.32-1.38v

__________________
Coolermaster 690II Advanced | Corsair 1000W
Creative X-FI Titanium Fatal1ty Pro
Intel i5 2500K (4.5ghz @ 1.33v)Corsair H100
PNY GTX 470 SLI SLi
Asus P8Z68-V Pro
Intel 320 SSD SATAII 2 X 120GB Raid 0
Kingston HyperX (4x4096MB)(8-8-9-28 @ 1600mhz @ 1.5v)

Heatware: 13-0-0

Last edited by Sentential; 01-10-06 at 03:58 PM.
Sentential is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 01-10-06, 11:45 AM Thread Starter   #3
Sentential
Contributing Member

 
Sentential's Avatar 

Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Jacksonville, FL

 
Benchmarks


Sisandra Artithmetic CPU Test



Sisandra RAM Bandwith



SuperPI


__________________
Coolermaster 690II Advanced | Corsair 1000W
Creative X-FI Titanium Fatal1ty Pro
Intel i5 2500K (4.5ghz @ 1.33v)Corsair H100
PNY GTX 470 SLI SLi
Asus P8Z68-V Pro
Intel 320 SSD SATAII 2 X 120GB Raid 0
Kingston HyperX (4x4096MB)(8-8-9-28 @ 1600mhz @ 1.5v)

Heatware: 13-0-0

Last edited by Sentential; 01-10-06 at 12:34 PM.
Sentential is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 01-10-06, 11:46 AM Thread Starter   #4
Sentential
Contributing Member

 
Sentential's Avatar 

Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Jacksonville, FL

 
Comments


So far no significant changes from what I usually expect out of my 640. In addition the heat load at the voltage I am using now is rougly the same as well.

So far so good no installation issues or driver conflicts to speak of. One thing that I have noticed is that this chip feels like a different version than what most people who have the 955s. Its far more responsive to voltage and the temps as a whole are *significantally* higher especially as voltage is applied.

I really do not have any idea how anyone could at or over 1.4v on these chips. Especially on stock or any form of air cooling.

This I find to be somewhat ironic because the stock cooler on this chip is about the size of the one for my Celly D except it has a copper core. At the very least its smaller than the one packaged with my 640.

All in all its a very boreing chip, in a good way. Its plug-in-play without any sort of major issues. Thermals are as expected, clocks are as expected. Nothing really to complain or be excited about.

If you want dual core this would be the one to buy. Perhaps latter versions will scale better but at this moment 920s are where its at.

That being said I have some misgivings about the dual core craze. With all honesty there is no difference between a true dual core and HT. If benches are what you want Presler is not for you. Instead buy Cedar mill if that is your goal.

Also just a warning to perspective buyers, check your IHS and make sure its flat, mine as you can clearly tell is not:


__________________
Coolermaster 690II Advanced | Corsair 1000W
Creative X-FI Titanium Fatal1ty Pro
Intel i5 2500K (4.5ghz @ 1.33v)Corsair H100
PNY GTX 470 SLI SLi
Asus P8Z68-V Pro
Intel 320 SSD SATAII 2 X 120GB Raid 0
Kingston HyperX (4x4096MB)(8-8-9-28 @ 1600mhz @ 1.5v)

Heatware: 13-0-0

Last edited by Sentential; 01-10-06 at 04:32 PM.
Sentential is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 01-10-06, 12:00 PM   #5
hUMANbEATbOX
Contributing Member

 
hUMANbEATbOX's Avatar 

Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: WINNIPEG REPRUHZENT!

 
hey, i call those pretty good results. i don't think that 820's could do 4200mhz on air (here's to hoping you can stabalize at those speeds).

i think its safe to say so far that 920's are the chip to get, unless you got some extra $$ and the cooling to handle a 940.

__________________
i7 970 @ 4.2ghz - 1.275v
3x4gb
560ti
and my baby Lucy
<----


Do not go gentle into that good night,
Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
hUMANbEATbOX is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 01-10-06, 12:08 PM Thread Starter   #6
Sentential
Contributing Member

 
Sentential's Avatar 

Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Jacksonville, FL

 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hUMANbEATbOX
hey, i call those pretty good results. i don't think that 820's could do 4200mhz on air (here's to hoping you can stabalize at those speeds).

i think its safe to say so far that 920's are the chip to get, unless you got some extra $$ and the cooling to handle a 940.
Nah, most of the 820s couldnt even do 3.8

__________________
Coolermaster 690II Advanced | Corsair 1000W
Creative X-FI Titanium Fatal1ty Pro
Intel i5 2500K (4.5ghz @ 1.33v)Corsair H100
PNY GTX 470 SLI SLi
Asus P8Z68-V Pro
Intel 320 SSD SATAII 2 X 120GB Raid 0
Kingston HyperX (4x4096MB)(8-8-9-28 @ 1600mhz @ 1.5v)

Heatware: 13-0-0
Sentential is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 01-10-06, 12:42 PM Thread Starter   #7
Sentential
Contributing Member

 
Sentential's Avatar 

Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Jacksonville, FL

 
Updated with pictures

__________________
Coolermaster 690II Advanced | Corsair 1000W
Creative X-FI Titanium Fatal1ty Pro
Intel i5 2500K (4.5ghz @ 1.33v)Corsair H100
PNY GTX 470 SLI SLi
Asus P8Z68-V Pro
Intel 320 SSD SATAII 2 X 120GB Raid 0
Kingston HyperX (4x4096MB)(8-8-9-28 @ 1600mhz @ 1.5v)

Heatware: 13-0-0
Sentential is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 01-10-06, 12:45 PM   #8
Vrykyl
Tornado Guy

 
Vrykyl's Avatar 

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: UK

 
looking cracking sen mate burn her in sen style and see how high she'l go under 1.4v!! iv got a 920 coming now too as you know - should be with me next week with luck
Vrykyl is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 01-10-06, 12:54 PM Thread Starter   #9
Sentential
Contributing Member

 
Sentential's Avatar 

Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Jacksonville, FL

 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vrykyl
looking cracking sen mate burn her in sen style and see how high she'l go under 1.4v!! iv got a 920 coming now too as you know - should be with me next week with luck
Ya im doing that now. Not sure whether I should be miffed or what. This chip is just idk dull. I dont even notice it versus my 640.

__________________
Coolermaster 690II Advanced | Corsair 1000W
Creative X-FI Titanium Fatal1ty Pro
Intel i5 2500K (4.5ghz @ 1.33v)Corsair H100
PNY GTX 470 SLI SLi
Asus P8Z68-V Pro
Intel 320 SSD SATAII 2 X 120GB Raid 0
Kingston HyperX (4x4096MB)(8-8-9-28 @ 1600mhz @ 1.5v)

Heatware: 13-0-0
Sentential is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 01-10-06, 01:25 PM   #10
bazx
Member

 
bazx's Avatar 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: England

 
sen as this is 2x core can you test its ablity to perform two
benchmarks @ the same time

baz
bazx is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 01-10-06, 01:30 PM Thread Starter   #11
Sentential
Contributing Member

 
Sentential's Avatar 

Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Jacksonville, FL

 
Quote:
Originally Posted by bazx
sen as this is 2x core can you test its ablity to perform two
benchmarks @ the same time

baz
That is generally tought to do since you would need duplicates of each benchmark. Often you cannot do that without massive work in the registery (which I dont feel like doing lol)

__________________
Coolermaster 690II Advanced | Corsair 1000W
Creative X-FI Titanium Fatal1ty Pro
Intel i5 2500K (4.5ghz @ 1.33v)Corsair H100
PNY GTX 470 SLI SLi
Asus P8Z68-V Pro
Intel 320 SSD SATAII 2 X 120GB Raid 0
Kingston HyperX (4x4096MB)(8-8-9-28 @ 1600mhz @ 1.5v)

Heatware: 13-0-0
Sentential is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 01-10-06, 01:36 PM   #12
Vrykyl
Tornado Guy

 
Vrykyl's Avatar 

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: UK

 
dual superpi? cant you just have two pi folders and run each exe without tweaking around?
hope your not gonna get dissapointed on us now sen...its gotta be better than your 6xx even if you dont notice simply because theres 2 core... cheers up mate!
Vrykyl is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 01-10-06, 01:39 PM Thread Starter   #13
Sentential
Contributing Member

 
Sentential's Avatar 

Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Jacksonville, FL

 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vrykyl
dual superpi? cant you just have two pi folders and run each exe without tweaking around?
hope your not gonna get dissapointed on us now sen...its gotta be better than your 6xx even if you dont notice simply because theres 2 core... cheers up mate!
Im not dissapointed at all, Im very happy with it as a whole its just that interesting of a chip. Mediocre would describe it best. That or Xeon because its about as steady as a server chip, but certinaly not a hotrod.

__________________
Coolermaster 690II Advanced | Corsair 1000W
Creative X-FI Titanium Fatal1ty Pro
Intel i5 2500K (4.5ghz @ 1.33v)Corsair H100
PNY GTX 470 SLI SLi
Asus P8Z68-V Pro
Intel 320 SSD SATAII 2 X 120GB Raid 0
Kingston HyperX (4x4096MB)(8-8-9-28 @ 1600mhz @ 1.5v)

Heatware: 13-0-0
Sentential is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 01-10-06, 01:41 PM   #14
Vrykyl
Tornado Guy

 
Vrykyl's Avatar 

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: UK

 
maybe itl pick up more if your burn in's succesful? higher clocks can never be a bad thing... what did your 6xx clock to?
Vrykyl is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 01-10-06, 01:43 PM   #15
crotale
Member

 
crotale's Avatar 

Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Sweden

 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sentential
This I find to be somewhat ironic because the stock cooler on this chip is about the size of the one for my Celly D except it has a copper core. At the very least its smaller than the one packaged with my 640.
Interesting.
Here's a picture of the cooler I got with the 955XE (to the right):



This one has a larger core than other P4-HSs I've seen.

__________________
"In mild doses, ethylene produces states of euphoria, associated with stimulus
to the pleasure centres of the human brain."

Intel benching: X22138, H30363, P37253, E69642
crotale is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 01-10-06, 01:49 PM Thread Starter   #16
Sentential
Contributing Member

 
Sentential's Avatar 

Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Jacksonville, FL

 
Quote:
Originally Posted by crotale
Interesting.
Here's a picture of the cooler I got with the 955XE (to the right):



This one has a larger core than other P4-HSs I've seen.
As you can tell from the pictures I provided the one I received in my boxed pakage is slightly smaller than the one on the left.

The copper core is the same aprox size but the height of the fins has been decreased to that of the celly d sinks

__________________
Coolermaster 690II Advanced | Corsair 1000W
Creative X-FI Titanium Fatal1ty Pro
Intel i5 2500K (4.5ghz @ 1.33v)Corsair H100
PNY GTX 470 SLI SLi
Asus P8Z68-V Pro
Intel 320 SSD SATAII 2 X 120GB Raid 0
Kingston HyperX (4x4096MB)(8-8-9-28 @ 1600mhz @ 1.5v)

Heatware: 13-0-0
Sentential is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 01-10-06, 01:53 PM   #17
TechtonicPC
Member, formerly Surfrat

 
TechtonicPC's Avatar 

Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Florida

 
I have not been impressed by these 9xx series thus far, but your chip shows some deffinate promise Sen. Air Cooling, Reasonable VCore, and Decent temps on the cheapest of the bunch.

Still not enough for me to plunge into another dual core, but nice indeed. (My 830 went to Ebay!)

Batboy's is running nicely also, but it nice to see this 820 do so well, and on air cooling to boot.

Now, where o where o where is Cedar Mill!! (yea too much Blue House )

__________________

Case: Corsair 800D
CPU: 3770K
Ram: GSkill Ripjaw X - 16gb - 8-8-8-24 @1600
MOBO: Asus P8Z77-V
Sound: X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Pro
SSD: Vertex 4 - 128gb
HDD: WD Black 1TB (2)
Video: XFX Radeon 6950
PSU: Silverstone 1000 watt Full Modular


Lamptron Touch, XSPC RX360, Swiftech MCP655, Lund Reservoir, Koolance 370
TechtonicPC is offline Author Profile   QUOTE Thanks
Old 01-10-06, 02:02 PM   #18
Vrykyl
Tornado Guy

 
Vrykyl's Avatar 

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: UK

 
surfrat, you can delete your excess posts btw theres an option for it under edit!

Sen, that stock cooler looks more than just a little bit rubbish...folks had better upgrade from stock sink if they wanna keep these under control!!
Vrykyl is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 01-10-06, 02:31 PM   #19
Ross
Senior Intel-lectual



Join Date: May 2002

 
Quote:
That being said I have some misgivings about the dual core craze. With all honesty there is no difference between a true dual core and HT. If benches are what you want Presler is not for you. Instead buy Cedar mill if that is your goal.
Eh, I dunno about that. Both Ranger's and mine have beat every one of our best 6x0 bench scores in everything...PC or 3D (except for SPi) at much, much lower FSB. How much of that can be attributed to the extra cache, I don't know, but clocking a 6x0 to match a clock of one of these and benching both, I don't think they'd even be in the same ballpark.

I was never a dual core fan, but I've taken my first step towards on the Presler. If I didn't need to wait like months to find a Yonah desktop mobo, I might give one of them a go, but I think it's just going to end up a CM.
Ross is offline Author Profile   QUOTE Thanks
Old 01-10-06, 02:42 PM   #20
bazx
Member

 
bazx's Avatar 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: England

 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sentential
That is generally tought to do since you would need duplicates of each benchmark. Often you cannot do that without massive work in the registery (which I dont feel like doing lol)
run a 3d or sumit and a 1m at the same time i would like to see if the 1m slows down alot

if at all

chin up dude
bazx is offline   QUOTE Thanks

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe


Overclockers Forums > Hardware > CPUs > Intel CPUs
Intel CPUs
Forum Jump

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Mobile Skin
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:24 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
You can add these icons by updating your profile information to include your Heatware ID, Benching Profile ID or your Folding/SETI profile ID. Edit your profile!
X

Welcome to Overclockers.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

New members like you have made this the best community on the Internet since 1998!


(4 digit year)

Why Join Us?

  • Share experience
  • Max out your hardware
  • Best forum members anywhere
  • Customized forum experience

Already a member?