M Mixman Member Joined Oct 30, 2005 Jan 17, 2006 #1 I have been reading here and I am going to order one or the other today to replace my mediocre 820 chip. Is the extra $60 worth it for the 930 or can the 920 do just as well for less ?
I have been reading here and I am going to order one or the other today to replace my mediocre 820 chip. Is the extra $60 worth it for the 930 or can the 920 do just as well for less ?
Sentential Contributing Member Joined Sep 16, 2003 Location Knoxville, TN Jan 17, 2006 #2 920s as a whole clock better in addition to them having a lower multi (higher FSB) and being cheaper
LandShark Super Shark Moderator Joined Aug 13, 2001 Location Deep Blue Sea (Maryland) Jan 17, 2006 #3 from the current trend from other members in here, the 920 seems to be able to clock better than the 930 and offer the best bang for buck....
from the current trend from other members in here, the 920 seems to be able to clock better than the 930 and offer the best bang for buck....
Randyman... Member Joined May 8, 2004 Jan 17, 2006 #5 I'd probably say 920. I bought a 930, and I can barely hit 4GHz on air, but I'm keeping her...
RangerXLT8 Member Joined Oct 9, 2004 Location Asheville NC Jan 18, 2006 #6 920 baby. Running 4.0ghz on air, ZALMAN 9500 to be specific. 1.42v in the bios. Load temp never above 60c. Has been stability tested and stability tested.
920 baby. Running 4.0ghz on air, ZALMAN 9500 to be specific. 1.42v in the bios. Load temp never above 60c. Has been stability tested and stability tested.