Notices

Overclockers Forums > Hardware > CPUs > Intel CPUs
Intel CPUs
Forum Jump

Intel testing 45nm.

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe Search this Thread
 
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-25-06, 11:27 PM Thread Starter   #1
party animal
Member

 
party animal's Avatar 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Saratoga, CA/University of California Irvine

 
Intel testing 45nm.


According to Intel's website, they are demonstrating working 45nm chips. I wonder what kind of ocs we can get out of these

__________________

CPU- Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
MOBO- DFI ICFX3200
RAM- 2GB CellShock 1000Mhz 5-5-5-15
VID- ATi x1950pro
HDD- Western Digital Raptor 74GB
Western Digital SE16 320GB
HEAT
party animal is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 01-25-06, 11:39 PM   #2
proth
Member

 
proth's Avatar 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: In your mirror

 
Quote:
Originally Posted by party animal
According to Intel's website, they are demonstrating working 45nm chips. I wonder what kind of ocs we can get out of these
By the time they release that, they'll be down to 16 stage pipeline running the core @ 2.0GHz

Party is over for ultra high clock speeds after Cedar Mills and Pressler

IMO

__________________
PROTH, CONTACT KRAG ASAP, YOU DECIDED TO TRADE OUTSIDE THE CLASSIFIEDS AND YOU HAVE ANOTHER MEMBERS HARDWARE YOU VOLT-MODDED AND NEVER RETURNED TO HIM. BE A GOOD IDEA TO CONTACT KRAG BEFORE WE MAKE THIS A TROLL SITUATION-FORUM STAFF
proth is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 01-25-06, 11:49 PM Thread Starter   #3
party animal
Member

 
party animal's Avatar 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Saratoga, CA/University of California Irvine

 
But if they are running 2.0 stock, i wonder how high they will go. Comparing apples to apples here.

__________________

CPU- Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
MOBO- DFI ICFX3200
RAM- 2GB CellShock 1000Mhz 5-5-5-15
VID- ATi x1950pro
HDD- Western Digital Raptor 74GB
Western Digital SE16 320GB
HEAT
party animal is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 01-26-06, 12:10 AM   #4
wingman99
Member

 
wingman99's Avatar 

Join Date: Dec 2003

10 Year Badge
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by party animal
But if they are running 2.0 stock, i wonder how high they will go. Comparing apples to apples here.
That is a good point, i hope there better than $245 3.2 p4 Northwood
wingman99 is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 01-26-06, 12:14 AM   #5
d94
$30 a phone

 
d94's Avatar 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: 48302

 
Quote:
Originally Posted by party animal
But if they are running 2.0 stock, i wonder how high they will go. Comparing apples to apples here.
if they hit 3, that's rock
if they hit 4, that would be un-realistic

Quote:
'Wolfdale' and 'Ridgefield', for example, two dual-core, single-die desktop chips due 2008, will have 3MB and 6MB of cache apiece.

These should appear alongside 'Perryville' and 'Penryn', respectively single-core and dual-core mobile parts, the former with 2MB of cache, according to the report, the latter with 3MB and 6MB of L2.

On the server side, we have 'Hapertown', an eight-core Xeon with 12MB of cache shared between the cores. It doesn't look like we're going to see a desktop CPU with eight cores until 2008/2009, with the debut of 'Yorkfield', also sporting 12MB of cache.

The same timeframe will see the debut of the quad-core 'Bloomfield', but how much cache it will contain isn't known. The same question hangs over the 'Silverthorne' mobile processor, for which we don't even have a core-count yet.
http://www.theregister.com/2005/12/0..._45nm_roadmap/
JESUS 12mb cache LOL 8x core WTH!

__________________
Antec 300 Intel Q6600 @ 3.7 - X48-DS4 - 4gb ddr2 - 500w Earthwatt's - 52" Sharp Aquos LC-52D64U
1x 640GB WD - 2x 1TB Greenpower - 2x 400GB Seagate - ATI 4830 512mb @ 680/975
3DMark Vanage 7402 3DMark05 20,447 3DMark06 13,693

Emachines amd x2 5000+ @ 2.9ghz w/foxconn bios - 2gb ddr2
stock POS 300w - 400gb Seagate - diNovo + VX Revolution

MacBook Air - 1.6ghz c2d - 2gb ddr2 - 80gb

heatware
d94 is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 01-26-06, 12:31 AM   #6
proth
Member

 
proth's Avatar 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: In your mirror

 
if they hit 3, that's rock
if they hit 4, that would be un-realistic


LOL

__________________
PROTH, CONTACT KRAG ASAP, YOU DECIDED TO TRADE OUTSIDE THE CLASSIFIEDS AND YOU HAVE ANOTHER MEMBERS HARDWARE YOU VOLT-MODDED AND NEVER RETURNED TO HIM. BE A GOOD IDEA TO CONTACT KRAG BEFORE WE MAKE THIS A TROLL SITUATION-FORUM STAFF
proth is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 01-26-06, 12:52 AM   #7
3DFlyer
Banned



Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Cockpit

 
I saw a register rumor that stated the Conroe would have a model at 3.333GHz. On and 18 stage pipeline at that. I wouldn't count out high clocks yet. People have stated that you can only go so high with shorter pipes, but that is with AMD CPU's...not Intels. Intel has alot more money to develop technology with, and they got some pretty smart cookies there too. I think we better wait and see what an actual Intel will do with the shorter pipes. It may very well change rewrite the way CPU's work with these shorter pipes.
3DFlyer is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 01-26-06, 02:24 AM Thread Starter   #8
party animal
Member

 
party animal's Avatar 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Saratoga, CA/University of California Irvine

 
i agree, im actually pretty excited about what Conroe can actually do. Intel has done pretty well with shorts pipelines considering the Pentium M and Core Duo.

__________________

CPU- Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
MOBO- DFI ICFX3200
RAM- 2GB CellShock 1000Mhz 5-5-5-15
VID- ATi x1950pro
HDD- Western Digital Raptor 74GB
Western Digital SE16 320GB
HEAT
party animal is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 01-26-06, 02:50 AM   #9
Sjaak
Member

 
Sjaak's Avatar 

Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The Netherlands

 
Keep in mind that what they are showing here are mere samples of a couple of DRAM chips...it may take another year or two before they get actual 45nm processors working.

__________________
'Apparantly reality has a strong liberal bias'
Sjaak is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 01-26-06, 03:06 AM   #10
>HyperlogiK<
Member

 
>HyperlogiK<'s Avatar 

Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sword Base

 
Take all these things with a pinch of salt, Sony/Toshiba/IBM had claimed that they would have cell being fabbed on 45nm by the second half of this year, that then became 65nm.
It's certainly promising that Intel are making such advancements, but these things take times as well as R&D money.

__________________
The Last Gonzo of Scotland.
Core i7 950 @ 4Ghz, Gigabyte x58-USB3, Radeon 6870 CF, Xonar D2X, 12GB Kingston HyperX 1600, Bigfoot 2100, Agility 3 120GB, 3x 2TB Spinpoint F4, Corsair HX1000w, Cambridge Audio A500 and Acoustic Research speakers (Main PC)
Alienware M11x, C2D SU 7300, Geforce 335M, Corsair Force 40GB (Laptop)
Opteron 175, DFI Lanparty NF4 Ultra D, Radeon x850 XT PE, 4GB BH-5, OCZ Petrol 64GB, X-Fi Xtreme Music, 2x TerraTec PHASE 22, Enermax Liberty ELT500, Yamaha A-S300 and Mordaunt Short Aviano speakers (Music PC)
Pentium D 920, Gigabyte 965P-S3, Geforce 210, 2GB Elpida DDR2, TerraTec PHASE 22, ASUS DVB-T (HTPC)
Dual P3 866Mhz, Intel 440LX Board, 1.8GB PC133Mhz, 2x Voodoo 2 12MB, Turtle Beach FIJI (Retro Gaming Machine)

Heatware
>HyperlogiK< is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 01-26-06, 10:21 AM   #11
hUMANbEATbOX
Contributing Member

 
hUMANbEATbOX's Avatar 

Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: WINNIPEG REPRUHZENT!

 
well intel has no shortage of r&d money, that's for sure.

__________________
i7 970 @ 4.2ghz - 1.275v
6x4gb
560ti
and my baby Lucy
<----

Do not go gentle into that good night,
Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
hUMANbEATbOX is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 01-26-06, 12:16 PM   #12
bobad
Member

 
bobad's Avatar 

Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Louisiana

 
Quote:
Originally Posted by proth
By the time they release that, they'll be down to 16 stage pipeline running the core @ 2.0GHz Party is over for ultra high clock speeds after Cedar Mills and Pressler IMO
I've been wondering for 2-3 years when the extreme frequencies would back off and they would go in the direction of smaller die sizes and multiple cores.

Now I bet we'll see "Core Wars" instead of those insane frequencies.

Hmmmm... wonder how fast a 45nm chip at 2ghz with 16 cores would be? Even a mild overclock on such a chip would gain a lot of speed. We just won't talk about multi-core heat right now. We can cross that bridge when we get to it.

__________________
-=Bob=-

Temporary System:
P8Z68-V, 2500K@4.5Ghz VCore 1.300
2x4gb Ripjaws X @9-9-9-24, VRAM 1.5
Hyper212+ cooler, <15▲ idle, <37▲ load
Antec Three Hundred Two case
Antec Neo Eco 520w PS
Giga GTX 550 Ti 1Gb gddr5
Samsung 840 Pro 256Gb, WD 800Gb
Crystalmarks 299,182+++
SuperPi 8.331
bobad is offline   QUOTE Thanks

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe


Overclockers Forums > Hardware > CPUs > Intel CPUs
Intel CPUs
Forum Jump

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Mobile Skin
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:16 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
You can add these icons by updating your profile information to include your Heatware ID, Benching Profile ID or your Folding/SETI profile ID. Edit your profile!
X

Welcome to Overclockers.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

New members like you have made this the best community on the Internet since 1998!


(4 digit year)

Why Join Us?

  • Share experience
  • Max out your hardware
  • Best forum members anywhere
  • Customized forum experience

Already a member?