Notices

Overclockers Forums > Hardware > Motherboards > General Motherboards
General Motherboards
Forum Jump

SLI Mode Comparison Question

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe Search this Thread
 
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-10-06, 04:09 PM Thread Starter   #1
Shadow6107
Registered



Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Georgia

 
SLI Mode Comparison Question


Alright, I'm getting ready to build a new PC this summer, but being a (poor) AGP user, I know very little about PCI-E. I do know that in the world of SLI motherboards, some will run 16x with a single card, and 8x/8x with two cards, then I saw the ASUS A8N32 Deluxe SLI, which will run 16x/16x SLI, I see these numbers, but specifically what do they mean in terms of performance?
Shadow6107 is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Overclockers Approved
Which motherboard should you buy? Get the final word here. Check out the latest Overclockers reviews:
ASRock Z77 OC Formula Motherboard Review

ASRock teamed up with overclocker Nick Shih to make a high-end overclocking-based, yet functional for all users, motherboard named the Z77 OC Formula. It appears they have achieved it. Read More.

Get it at NewEgg for $239.99
ASUS Maximus V Formula Motherboard

The Maximus V Formula is part of the ROG (Republic of Gamers) series of motherboards, which in itself brings a high level of expectation. It's a no brainer, Overclockers Approved! Read more.

Get it at NewEgg for $279.99
Old 05-10-06, 04:12 PM   #2
PWatterson
Member

 
PWatterson's Avatar 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD

 
Actually, the 16x bandwidth for both cards has virtually no performance increase. 8/8 is plenty.

__________________
Personal: Intel E3110 - Biostar TPower I45 - 2x2Gb Mushkin Redline - eVGA GTX260 Core 216 - WD VelociRaptor 74Gb RAID 0 - Seasonic S12II Bronze 520w - Antec Twelve Hundred
Spare: AMD Opteron 165 (2601 MHz @ 1.325v x 110%) - DFI nF4 Lanparty SLI-DR - 2x1Gb OCZ Platinum - eVGA 7800gt SLI - WD 120Gb - Enermax 350w
Gov't Issued Desktop: Intel E8400 - Dell Motherboard- 4Gb DDR2 - ATI Radeon HD4670 512 Mb - 320Gb Seagate
Gov't Issued Netbook: Intel Atom Z520 - 1GB DDR2 - 40Gb PATA
PWatterson is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 05-10-06, 06:30 PM Thread Starter   #3
Shadow6107
Registered



Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Georgia

 
Well, I appreciate the help on that aspect of the question, but the other half of the question is, what exactly does that effect? what, specifically, is the difference between 16x/16x and 8x/8x?
Shadow6107 is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 05-10-06, 08:27 PM   #4
PWatterson
Member

 
PWatterson's Avatar 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD

 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadow6107
Well, I appreciate the help on that aspect of the question, but the other half of the question is, what exactly does that effect? what, specifically, is the difference between 16x/16x and 8x/8x?
I am no expert, but I believe it determines the amount of data that can be transferred at once. It is something like the bus width or something, but like I said I am no expert when it comes to stuff like this.

__________________
Personal: Intel E3110 - Biostar TPower I45 - 2x2Gb Mushkin Redline - eVGA GTX260 Core 216 - WD VelociRaptor 74Gb RAID 0 - Seasonic S12II Bronze 520w - Antec Twelve Hundred
Spare: AMD Opteron 165 (2601 MHz @ 1.325v x 110%) - DFI nF4 Lanparty SLI-DR - 2x1Gb OCZ Platinum - eVGA 7800gt SLI - WD 120Gb - Enermax 350w
Gov't Issued Desktop: Intel E8400 - Dell Motherboard- 4Gb DDR2 - ATI Radeon HD4670 512 Mb - 320Gb Seagate
Gov't Issued Netbook: Intel Atom Z520 - 1GB DDR2 - 40Gb PATA
PWatterson is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 05-10-06, 08:32 PM   #5
azu
Member

 
azu's Avatar 

Join Date: Dec 2005

 
8x refers to the bandwith of the PCIE bus. theoretically 16x>8x. but as you know, we are unable to ever take full advantage of the entire bus. From early results, the 16x actually showed lower performance value as it has two nforce4s which needed to work together.

This is similar to agp 1x, 2x, 4x,8x, pci mode

lol. just clearifying.

in terms of performance 8x8x or 16x16 there is little negligable performance difference.
azu is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 05-10-06, 08:36 PM   #6
Neuromancer
Member

 
Neuromancer's Avatar 

Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tau'ri

 
Actually the 16/16 board is not a good investment right now because nvidia didnt ADD 16 lanes to get the 16/16. they took it from other places.

The radeon 3200 I believe is true 16/16 and the next nvidia chipset will include it also.

I could be TOTALLY wrong though
Neuromancer is offline Benching Profile Heatware Profile   QUOTE Thanks

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe


Overclockers Forums > Hardware > Motherboards > General Motherboards
General Motherboards
Forum Jump

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Mobile Skin
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:07 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
You can add these icons by updating your profile information to include your Heatware ID, Benching Profile ID or your Folding/SETI profile ID. Edit your profile!
X

Welcome to Overclockers.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

New members like you have made this the best community on the Internet since 1998!


(4 digit year)

Why Join Us?

  • Share experience
  • Max out your hardware
  • Best forum members anywhere
  • Customized forum experience

Already a member?