- Joined
- Jan 28, 2006
so If I sell my current rig, im going to upgrade to am2, are there any really nice processors I should wait for, or just get a dual core? And which one would be good for overclocking.
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
Sure that is true but look at how much more performance you are going to get from the Conroe. IIRC, Intel is releasing a set of cheaper Core 2 Duo chips. The downside to them is they only come equiped with 2mb of Cache vs the 4mb on the higher end models.Jmag034 said:E6300 allendale is 180, and conroe boards are expensive
X2 3800 is 169 and boards are cheap
Now hold on there. Are you absolutely sure? You sound like proven FAQs.makaka said:i am pretty sure that @ stock amd should be better but if borth overclocked the intel will win by far...
so if u look for cheap cpu @ stock go with amd
if u look for cheap cpu @ max go with intel
note:i am taking about 3600+ vs e4200
yeah fsb is highly limiting conroe overclocking capability lets hope that newer motherboard will come out with higher oc potentialgreenmaji said:I've seen Core2 compatable mobo's for as little as $60 chill on the expensive mobo rant untill they come out
I want to see what the $75 Asrock X-Fire can do for the budget builders (It went retail in Japan already but I havn't seen any FSB news on it yet)
makaka said:yeah fsb is highly limiting conroe overclocking capability lets hope that newer motherboard will come out with higher oc potential
3 ghz sould be dowable in watercooling .but wait maybe u should look to conroe cpu first .the one with best /performance price should be yourAntioch said:Anyone know how well AM2s overclock?
Im going to upgrade from my AthlonXP 3000+ to an Athlon64 X2 4400+ after the price drop and get am AM2 board.
How well will this sucker overclock? I'll be using watercooling...
I've never really OCed before so I'm not sure if you can change multipliers with athlon64s. I believe the 4200/4400 come with 10x multiplier... would it be better to grab a 4600+ with less cache and a 11x multiplier as compared to a 4400+ with a 10x mult. and 2mb cache?