whoa amazing clocking chip.????

xtreme_ego · Mar 22, 2007

412x9 @3.7ghz.

vcore is at 1.34 bios and in cpuz,other software so no vdroop :santa:

and soo far orthos stable 1hour..... yes this is on water but wow low vcore????? :drool:

btw its at 52 c load 37c idle ambient at 24c :drool:

man I love this chip!!! id onlly i had better ram........hello 4ghz club.... all on a e6600

anyone else get a low 1.225 stock vcore chip???

nd4spdbh2 · Mar 22, 2007

many people have the 1.225 default VID chips, they are rarer... they do tend to clock around the same, but theres always the cherries.

IMO the e6600's are the best clockers for the money for non extreem cooling (good water, high end air) heck currently im sitting at 3.0ghz @ 1.225v :beer:

and my chip has been to 4.005ghz and back :santa:

but NICE oc none the less

what are the rest of your system specs?

Mycobacteria · Mar 22, 2007

do these special chips have some kind of number by which we can identifiy them??? Care to share these batch numbers with us?

And does this special batch number carry over to the E6700s????

ie a E6700 that runs at lower volts than other E6700s....

nd4spdbh2 · Mar 22, 2007

Mycobacteria said:
do these special chips have some kind of number by which we can identifiy them??? Care to share these batch numbers with us?

And does this special batch number carry over to the E6700s????

ie a E6700 that runs at lower volts than other E6700s....

if im not mistaken many "B" chips are lower VID... not sure if the E6700 does the same thing but IMO a e6700 isnt worth it

Mycobacteria · Mar 22, 2007

So we are looking for a revision B E6600? Can you tell its a revision B from the outside of the box?

Or do you only know its a revision B when you run CPUZ (and buy then its too late)

xtreme_ego · Mar 22, 2007

Code:

Type: Blend - stress CPU and RAM Min: 8 Max: 4096 InPlace: No Mem: 1790 Time: 15
CPU: 3707MHz FSB: 412MHz [411MHz x 9.0 est.]
CPU: 3707MHz FSB: 412MHz [411MHz x 9.0 est.]
1:Starting MBMStarter.dll...
1:Started MBMStarter.dll: 1
3/22/2007 7:14 PM 
Launching 2 threads...
2:Using CPU #1
1:Using CPU #0
2:Beginning a continuous self-test to check your computer.
1:Beginning a continuous self-test to check your computer.
2:Press Stop to end this test.
1:Press Stop to end this test.
2:Test 1, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M19922945 using 1024K FFT length.
1:Test 1, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M19922945 using 1024K FFT length.
1:Test 2, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M19922943 using 1024K FFT length.
2:Test 2, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M19922943 using 1024K FFT length.
1:Test 3, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M19374367 using 1024K FFT length.
2:Test 3, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M19374367 using 1024K FFT length.
1:Test 4, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M19174369 using 1024K FFT length.
2:Test 4, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M19174369 using 1024K FFT length.
1:Test 5, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M18874369 using 1024K FFT length.
2:Test 5, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M18874369 using 1024K FFT length.
1:Test 6, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M18874367 using 1024K FFT length.
2:Test 6, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M18874367 using 1024K FFT length.
1:Test 7, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M18474367 using 1024K FFT length.
2:Test 7, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M18474367 using 1024K FFT length.
1:Test 8, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M18274367 using 1024K FFT length.
2:Test 8, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M18274367 using 1024K FFT length.
1:Test 9, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M18274369 using 1024K FFT length.
2:Test 9, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M18274369 using 1024K FFT length.
1:Self-test 1024K passed!
1:Test 1, 800000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M172031 using 8K FFT length.
2:Self-test 1024K passed!
2:Test 1, 800000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M172031 using 8K FFT length.
1:Test 2, 800000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M163839 using 8K FFT length.
2:Test 2, 800000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M163839 using 8K FFT length.
1:Test 3, 800000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M159745 using 8K FFT length.
2:Test 3, 800000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M159745 using 8K FFT length.
1:Test 4, 800000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M157695 using 8K FFT length.
2:Test 4, 800000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M157695 using 8K FFT length.
1:Test 5, 800000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M155649 using 8K FFT length.
2:Test 5, 800000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M155649 using 8K FFT length.
1:Test 6, 800000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M153599 using 8K FFT length.
2:Test 6, 800000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M153599 using 8K FFT length.
1:Test 7, 800000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M147455 using 8K FFT length.
2:Test 7, 800000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M147455 using 8K FFT length.
1:Test 8, 800000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M143361 using 8K FFT length.
2:Test 8, 800000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M143361 using 8K FFT length.
1:Test 9, 800000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M141311 using 8K FFT length.
2:Test 9, 800000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M141311 using 8K FFT length.
1:Test 10, 800000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M135169 using 8K FFT length.
2:Test 10, 800000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M135169 using 8K FFT length.
1:Test 11, 800000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M172031 using 8K FFT length.
2:Test 11, 800000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M172031 using 8K FFT length.
1:Self-test 8K passed!
1:Test 1, 560000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M212991 using 10K FFT length.
2:Self-test 8K passed!
2:Test 1, 560000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M212991 using 10K FFT length.
1:Test 2, 560000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M210415 using 10K FFT length.
2:Test 2, 560000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M210415 using 10K FFT length.
1:Test 3, 560000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M208897 using 10K FFT length.
2:Test 3, 560000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M208897 using 10K FFT length.
1:Test 4, 560000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M204799 using 10K FFT length.
2:Test 4, 560000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M204799 using 10K FFT length.
1:Test 5, 560000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M200705 using 10K FFT length.
2:Test 5, 560000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M200705 using 10K FFT length.
1:Test 6, 560000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M196607 using 10K FFT length.
2:Test 6, 560000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M196607 using 10K FFT length.
1:Test 7, 560000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M194561 using 10K FFT length.
2:Test 7, 560000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M194561 using 10K FFT length.
1:Test 8, 560000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M188415 using 10K FFT length.
2:Test 8, 560000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M188415 using 10K FFT length.
2:Test 9, 560000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M186369 using 10K FFT length.
1:Test 9, 560000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M186369 using 10K FFT length.
2:Test 10, 560000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M184319 using 10K FFT length.
1:Test 10, 560000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M184319 using 10K FFT length.
2:Test 11, 800000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M172031 using 10K FFT length.
1:Test 11, 800000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M172031 using 10K FFT length.
2:Self-test 10K passed!
2:Test 1, 4500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M17432577 using 896K FFT length.
1:Self-test 10K passed!
1:Test 1, 4500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M17432577 using 896K FFT length.
2:Test 2, 4500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M17432575 using 896K FFT length.
1:Test 2, 4500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M17432575 using 896K FFT length.
2:Test 3, 4500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M17115073 using 896K FFT length.
1:Test 3, 4500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M17115073 using 896K FFT length.
2:Test 4, 4500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M16815071 using 896K FFT length.
1:Test 4, 4500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M16815071 using 896K FFT length.
2:Test 5, 4500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M16515073 using 896K FFT length.
1:Test 5, 4500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M16515073 using 896K FFT length.
2:Test 6, 4500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M16515071 using 896K FFT length.
1:Test 6, 4500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M16515071 using 896K FFT length.
2:Test 7, 4500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M16297569 using 896K FFT length.
1:Test 7, 4500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M16297569 using 896K FFT length.
2:Test 8, 4500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M15997567 using 896K FFT length.
1:Test 8, 4500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M15997567 using 896K FFT length.
2:Test 9, 4500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M15597569 using 896K FFT length.
1:Test 9, 4500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M15597569 using 896K FFT length.
2:Self-test 896K passed!
2:Test 1, 5300 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M14942209 using 768K FFT length.
1:Self-test 896K passed!
1:Test 1, 5300 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M14942209 using 768K FFT length.
2:Test 2, 5300 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M14942207 using 768K FFT length.
1:Test 2, 5300 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M14942207 using 768K FFT length.
2:Test 3, 5300 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M14155777 using 768K FFT length.
1:Test 3, 5300 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M14155777 using 768K FFT length.
2:Test 4, 5300 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M14155775 using 768K FFT length.
1:Test 4, 5300 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M14155775 using 768K FFT length.
2:Test 5, 5300 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M13969343 using 768K FFT length.
1:Test 5, 5300 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M13969343 using 768K FFT length.
2:Test 6, 5300 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M13669345 using 768K FFT length.
1:Test 6, 5300 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M13669345 using 768K FFT length.
2:Test 7, 5300 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M13369345 using 768K FFT length.
1:Test 7, 5300 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M13369345 using 768K FFT length.
2:Test 8, 5300 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M13369343 using 768K FFT length.
1:Test 8, 5300 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M13369343 using 768K FFT length.
2:Test 9, 5300 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M13069345 using 768K FFT length.
1:Test 9, 5300 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M13069345 using 768K FFT length.
1:Self-test 768K passed!
1:Test 1, 460000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M250519 using 12K FFT length.
2:Self-test 768K passed!
2:Test 1, 460000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M250519 using 12K FFT length.
1:Test 2, 460000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M245759 using 12K FFT length.
2:Test 2, 460000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M245759 using 12K FFT length.
1:Test 3, 460000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M245281 using 12K FFT length.
2:Test 3, 460000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M245281 using 12K FFT length.
1:Test 4, 460000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M243713 using 12K FFT length.
2:Test 4, 460000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M243713 using 12K FFT length.
2:Test 5, 460000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M235519 using 12K FFT length.
1:Test 5, 460000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M235519 using 12K FFT length.
1:Test 6, 460000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M233473 using 12K FFT length.
2:Test 6, 460000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M233473 using 12K FFT length.

failed at 2:Test 6, 460000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M233473 using 12K FFT

i think it was 6 hours stable..... :bang head

xtreme_ego · Mar 22, 2007

xtreme_ego · Mar 22, 2007

close up of cpuz

forget the voltage listed its wrong.

xtreme_ego · Mar 22, 2007

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=180152

verified :bday:

nd4spdbh2 · Mar 22, 2007

ya seemed a lil to good to be tru... although u arnt gonna need much more voltage to get it to be stable.

And you can tell if you have a "B" revision by the box

look at the FPO/BATCH#

1st letter or digit = plant code (Malay)
0 = San Jose, Costa Rica
1 = Cavite, Philippines
3 = .............., Costa Rica
6 = Chandler, Arizona
7 = .........., Philippines
8 = Leixlip, Ireland
9 = Penang, Malaysia
L = ............, Malaysia
Q = ..........., Malaysia
R = Manila, Philippines
Y = Leixlip, Ireland

2nd digit = Year of production (2001)

3rd & 4th digits = week (49th week )

5th digit = revision

6th - 8th digits= lot number

Mine is L627A795 so

Mine was made in malaysia, in 2006, in the 27th week, Revision A, Lot 795

EDIT: you wanna play validation wars ??? :beer:

... jk but heres mine :burn:

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=133539

Mycobacteria · Mar 22, 2007

all nice nice nice...ahhh wonderful a revision B2.... but dude back to the question.....

CAN you or HOW do you tell its a revision B2 before opening the retail BOX???? :bang head

THANKS MAN IM GOIN to go shopping now....

Its like buying a pack of corn flakes and finding there is a FREE TOY inside!!!

nd4spdbh2 · Mar 22, 2007

read my last post

xtreme_ego · Mar 22, 2007

im shooting for 4ghz brb

Mycobacteria · Mar 22, 2007

In CPUZ I see he has "steeping 6"

Is this good or bad, is it good for OC if the number is higher or lower?

Oh and thanks for the info... (nube here)

nd4spdbh2 · Mar 22, 2007

xtreme_ego said:
im shooting for 4ghz brb

good luck.... after about 3.8ish... the volts needed start to RAMP UP majorly...

btw my 4ghz run was with a Ultra 120, and a 47cfm yate loon :beer:

xtreme_ego · Mar 22, 2007

got it to boot at 4.5ghz with 1.6vcore into windows but my start up programs killed it. lol o well Ill sit at 3.7. i buffed my vcore to 1.4 to add stability.

deathman20 · Mar 22, 2007

Thats amazing man. I need roughly 1.55V to boot to 3.7Ghz yet mien runs decently cool as well but still thats great chip you got better then my 1.325VID chips I've gotten.

Gautam · Mar 22, 2007

TBH, I don't think that booting into Windows at 4.5GHz on water is possible. (Unless ambient temps are subzero)

nd4spdbh2 · Mar 22, 2007

ya.... try 4ghz... u kno you wanna join the 4ghz club... believe me its amazing :beer:

xtreme_ego · Mar 23, 2007

Gautam said:
TBH, I don't think that booting into Windows at 4.5GHz on water is possible. (Unless ambient temps are subzero)

oh its possible when the processer is at 87c.... :drool:

yea it bombed out fast i saw the logo and bam gone...

chips still ok!!!! :santa:

whoa amazing clocking chip.????

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

High Speed Premium Senior

Senior Benchmark Addict

Member

Member

Similar threads