Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
Avg said:From what I've been reading even if nVidia comes out with something faster they wouldn't be able to make enough of them to make a difference.
rainless said:Link?
boonmar said:I'm not so thrill about the xt performance over gts. I thought it would be alot faster. Didn't ATI came out last month saying the the 2900 will be the fastest dx9 card ever??? Maybe they were referring to the xtx, which I've heard that the it's delay till 3rd quarter and it will be a limited quantity card, so expect to pay a lot.
MadMan007 said:I'll just wait until there's more varied results, a few games and 3DM at low-mid resolution without any IQ effects doesn't mean much. There is one thing everyone seems to forget or gloss over about NVs 8800s though, that the stream processors are clocked much higher than the main core speed. In terms of operations/second purely on the stream processors (assuming all other things are equal, which they aren't but...) that means ATi needs twice the stream processors at half the speed. So the 'wowza 320 stream processors' needs to be considered in light of that fact - unless ATi's are clocked higher as well.
deathman20 said:I wouldn't take that test shown over anything. Thats a relatively low resolution since these cards have alot more in them than what was shown. Give a 1600x1200 resolution and there we should see the real results. Let alone of course this is still beta drivers as well. Theres still more hope for it but the question is how much.
Either way, it preforms better than the 8800GTS in that test, but also its nearly a direct compeditor for the 8800GTX. .
Avg said: