-
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
are my 8800GT scores ok?
- Thread starter uberwoot
- Start date
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2006
Seems pretty good, with my setup I only get about 8500 
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2005
- Location
- Camarillo, CA!
OP your scores are spot on for ur system
Ouch... shows how much that X2 bottlenecks... and as much as people hate to admit it its true but not as apparent in games
Seems pretty good, with my setup I only get about 8500
Ouch... shows how much that X2 bottlenecks... and as much as people hate to admit it its true but not as apparent in games
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2006
- Location
- Eindhoven, The Netherlands
they are spot on for that config 
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2006
- Location
- Eindhoven, The Netherlands
13k is doable with that rig yes
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2003
almost as good as my vanilla on a highly oc'd 6750.....
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2007
OP your scores are spot on for ur system
Ouch... shows how much that X2 bottlenecks... and as much as people hate to admit it its true but not as apparent in games
Er, it's not as much an issue of the X2 bottlenecking, it's more a factor of 3dmark being a flawed benchmark which includes the CPU in the overall score. Yes, a C2D or C2Q would be faster, but not as much as the 3dmark score would lead one to believe.
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2005
- Location
- Camarillo, CA!
like i said... the x2 bottlenecks... but it as not aparent in realworld performance... but its there.
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2003
- Location
- Athens, Greece
So I shouldn't worry either for hitting a little over 10k with my Asus 8800GT 512 @ 1710/1770/2020 on my Opteron170 clocked @ 2.8GHz?
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2001
X2 4600+ and an XFX extreme 8800GT getting 13391 here... 3Dmark 05.
Getting 8890 in 06.
I just can't make my cheap AMD go faster, but hey, I can play Crysis with most stuff high in a tweaked config at 40+ FPS, I aint complaining. I swear the 3dmark stuff is overly intel happy because no way is AMD's that much slower in real world applications.
Getting 8890 in 06.
I just can't make my cheap AMD go faster, but hey, I can play Crysis with most stuff high in a tweaked config at 40+ FPS, I aint complaining. I swear the 3dmark stuff is overly intel happy because no way is AMD's that much slower in real world applications.
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2005
- Location
- Concord, NC
I wouldn't say it's overly Intel happy, but it is definitely way too CPU dependent considering it's a gfx benchmark. Intel CPU's just happen to be wiping the floor w/ AMD CPU's. Good thing is you don't need an overly powerful CPU to play games w/ high settings at high rez.
Games may make better use of the CPU in the future, but for now they are mainly GPU dependent.
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2001
Yeah true that, and my 4600+ isn't exactly the pinnacle of performance even for an AMD. Still almost doubled my scores from my 7600GT, and that wasn't slow to start with.
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2007
- Location
- the present
here are my scores with and without SLI
Q6600 @ 3.2GHz, 8800GT in SLI @ 700MHz, Vista x64:
3DMark Score 16003 3DMarks
SM 2.0 Score 6422 Marks
SM 3.0 Score 7397 Marks
CPU Score 4518 Marks
Q6600 @ 3.2GHz, single 8800GT 700MHz, Vista x64:
3DMark Score 12439 3DMarks
SM 2.0 Score 5127 Marks
SM 3.0 Score 5031 Marks
CPU Score 4460 Marks
Q6600 @ 3.2GHz, 8800GT in SLI @ 700MHz, Vista x64:
3DMark Score 16003 3DMarks
SM 2.0 Score 6422 Marks
SM 3.0 Score 7397 Marks
CPU Score 4518 Marks
Q6600 @ 3.2GHz, single 8800GT 700MHz, Vista x64:
3DMark Score 12439 3DMarks
SM 2.0 Score 5127 Marks
SM 3.0 Score 5031 Marks
CPU Score 4460 Marks
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2002
- Location
- California, US
What is odd is that I have a E6400 @ 3.35ghz with a PNY card @ 690 core/ (think it was +100mhz or so shaders)/900 mem and I had ~12600 3dmark06.
I thought the quads got a lot higher scores than the dual cores? Especially considering you have 3.6ghz.
Do you have vista?
I think you should be another 1000 marks higher. Sorry I don't have my 3dmark06 score on hand, since I guess I didn't save it and I'm not at my desktop to test it again.
I thought the quads got a lot higher scores than the dual cores? Especially considering you have 3.6ghz.
Do you have vista?
I think you should be another 1000 marks higher. Sorry I don't have my 3dmark06 score on hand, since I guess I didn't save it and I'm not at my desktop to test it again.
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2006
- Location
- Watertown, Mn
i was almost thinking the same thing.. ^^
