• Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!

Dual Boot Negatively Effects Performance?

Overclockers is supported by our readers. When you click a link to make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn More.

Steve The Egg

Registered
Joined
Dec 12, 2007
If I set a Raptor to dual boot xp and vista, will that negatively effect its performance. Also, besides the obvious difference in storage, is there any difference between these drives... performance wise.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822136035

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822136012

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822136034

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822136033

Some of them are pretty similar but the prices very greatly. Does the little window they put on the new one do anything for performance? Will buying a smaller drive (in terms of storage) yield better performance? Like 36 vs. 74 vs. 150.
 
Well, I don't see any differences between the first 4 except for the Raptor X, which has a window, and the last link, which is a smaller drive.

Honestly, I would buy none of those drives. Pick up a pair of the new 7200.11 Seagate drives and you will have around 200mb/sec read and close to raptor access times in a RAID0. Not worth it IMHO.

The larger the drive, the faster it would read/write/seek because it is on a more dense platter.
 
well yes but your price just double and then you could get 3 7200.11 and beat the raptors except in perhaps seek times...
 
Ok...well I could buy 5 250GB Seagates for the price of 2 150GB raptors.

How would the performance stack up? the 5 seagates vs. the 2 raptors? Also is it practical to have 5 hdd's?
 
it is pratical but now your asking for alotmore chance of failure in a raid 0 set up.

if you bought 5 what i wouodl do is

2 in raid 0 - windows / games et cetera
2 in raid 1 - documents / backups
1 drive as a regular drive for downloads and stuff
 
it is pratical but now your asking for alotmore chance of failure in a raid 0 set up.

if you bought 5 what i wouodl do is

2 in raid 0 - windows / games et cetera
2 in raid 1 - documents / backups
1 drive as a regular drive for downloads and stuff

What about an Matrix Raid? I think I can do 0+5... That way I can slice out the fastest part of the hard drives for my RAID 0, and leave the rest to RAID 5. Will I notice a boost in performance? I am mainly looking for a boost in OS and game load times in Xp SP2.
 
Back