-
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
Looking to start folding
- Thread starter uberwoot
- Start date
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2001
- Location
- Deep Blue Sea (Maryland)
in native WinSMP, I would say 'bout 3700~3900ppd depends on your memory speed.
but if you do Window + 2VMware/LinuxSMP, I would say it will make close to 5000ppd (ChasR might have more accurate number)!!
btw,
to the team!!
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2001
pretty darned fast!
Welcome to the team!
It can be "a little" frustrating to long time folers, too!that setup can be a little bit frustrating to the beginner Folder.
OP
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2007
- Thread Starter
- #9
Ok im pretty shure i could set up 2VMware/LinuxSMP so im going to try that one first. I probly wont be able to get it all up and running untill friday due to how much i work but i'll try to get it up as fast as i can to help out the team even tho it wont be that much.
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2004
- Location
- N of splat W of Torin
Be prepared to find out your OC won't fold at that speed. I hope it does cause your quad will be a huge asset to team 32...just don't be surprised that what was stable for gaming may not be under folding.
Best luck. and
Best luck.
and
OP
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2007
- Thread Starter
- #13
at 4ghz im 48 hour prime stable on all cores so folding shouldent be a problem at that clock.
Im getting another rig up and running some time next week or the week after that. Probly a E4500 rig that i will use for everyday use and i'll have this quad fold 24/7 for about a month or 2 untill the new yorkfeilds come out.
Im getting another rig up and running some time next week or the week after that. Probly a E4500 rig that i will use for everyday use and i'll have this quad fold 24/7 for about a month or 2 untill the new yorkfeilds come out.
but if you do Window + 2VMware/LinuxSMP, I would say it will make close to 5000ppd (ChasR might have more accurate number)!!
BAR rig is setup that way...we'll see how it does (though it's not clocked at 4ghz
)
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2003
you would think.
The SMP client can put your system in a bind if your overclock just alittle out of the stability range.
BAR rig is setup that way...we'll see how it does (though it's not clocked at 4ghz
Q6600 @ 3.0....I was running two Ubuntu VMs and tried a WinSMP? Waited 60 minutes and still hadn't completed a frame, so maybe that's not such a great idea.
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2003
lol yea I noticed the same thing the other day.
I think the best route is either of the 2.
1 x winsmp
1 x vmware ubuntu smp
or just 2 x vmware ubuntu smp.
I havn't had a issue with the 1st config but the second is giving me problems as the stability of this crap cpu is hard to find
I think the best route is either of the 2.
1 x winsmp
1 x vmware ubuntu smp
or just 2 x vmware ubuntu smp.
I havn't had a issue with the 1st config but the second is giving me problems as the stability of this crap cpu is hard to find
lol yea I noticed the same thing the other day.
I think the best route is either of the 2.
1 x winsmp
1 x vmware ubuntu smp
or just 2 x vmware ubuntu smp.
I havn't had a issue with the 1st config but the second is giving me problems as the stability of this crap cpu is hard to find
Two VMs on a quad is definitely better than one instance of winsmp. Right now BAR is getting 4200 PPD @ 3.0ghz, so I know it'll do better the higher it clocks. PLUS, the ram I bought should go to tighter timings which will help as well.
![[H]pututu](/forums/data/avatars/s/241/241673.jpg?1704411343){kind=avatar}
