-
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
Nvidia Upcoming GPUs Line-Up For Q2/Q3
- Thread starter redrumy3
- Start date
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2006
- Location
- Cedar Rapids, IA
GT200 SLi here i come!
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2004
- Location
- Ottawa, Canada
Jesus, how many high end cards do they need? lol. Its good to see a strong lineup for this year. Competition is strong!
- Joined
- May 26, 2004
- Location
- Japan, Tokyo, Ueno.
At least not just the GTX is based on the GT200, but where's the ultra ?
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2007
- Location
- Chicago, IL
Nvidia doesn't even try to get their naming scheme right anymore 
That 9900GTS better live up to the awesomeness of the 8800GTS.
That 9900GTS better live up to the awesomeness of the 8800GTS.
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2007
- Location
- Chicago, IL
Yes, the new GT200 core is supposed to be retarded good.
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2007
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2007
- Location
- Chicago, IL
I'm interested to see if the double cards will keep getting produced or if those are only bridges between new cores.
Will we see a HD4xxxX2 or a GT200 x2 soon or will they bring those out when they are lagging behind their new core release. I think it will be the latter.
Will we see a HD4xxxX2 or a GT200 x2 soon or will they bring those out when they are lagging behind their new core release. I think it will be the latter.
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2006
- Location
- UK
Is there any info on the potential performance of the GT200? All I remember is that spoof thread some time ago where some supposed 3D Mark scores were published (that were disappointingly low).
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2007
- Location
- Chicago, IL
Nvidia says it's 'supposed' to be that good, but who knows what it will really be like. Nvidia's spokesman, board, and CEO like to talk alot of E-Trash
I don't think Nvidia would take the 9800GX2 out of production if their highest GT200 card offerings got owned by it, and if they do, they are going to get some hate.
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2006
- Location
- UK
Nvidia says it's 'supposed' to be that good, but who knows what it will really be like. Nvidia's spokesman, board, and CEO like to talk alot of E-Trash
I don't think Nvidia would take the 9800GX2 out of production if their highest GT200 card offerings got owned by it, and if they do, they are going to get some hate.
That's true with all the smack talk about "the Intel CPU is dead" recently. Sounds like a playground fight.
This is going to be interesting for sure. I have no idea why they just didn't name the core G100 instead of GT200? Well, at least it should be a completely new core rather than a few tweaks here and there.
- Joined
- May 26, 2004
- Location
- Japan, Tokyo, Ueno.
Who knows maybe they made that and few others as well while they were waiting for ATI.
- Joined
- May 25, 2003
- Location
- Irving, Tx
So with the new Intel chips having the GPU built in will that completely eliminate a need for low end graphics cards? Intel is playing dirty if they do that.
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2001
Ditto ....Man , how many so-called NEW versions of of v/cards do we need out at one given time . Unless there is a 30%+ or better boost in performance then the current status its all a waste of time and $$$ (consumer end).
Each little incremental change for a mear 5%-(maybe)10% increase in performance lately is getting ridiculous and only brings down the values of relatively new cards . Dont get me wrong , Iam all for new tech and increased performance ; but damn make it worth our while and hard earned cash to upgrade .
I liked it much better when we actually had to wait quite awhile for the next gen of cards with a bigger performance increase , then we actually had to something to look forward to . This every 4 months of new xxxx is getting kinda stupid .
When we actually see a nice 35-50% increase in performance with-in a single generation , then I'll probably upgrade my current Sli ; but not before . Just my opinion .
. Unless there is a 30%+ or better boost in performance then the current status its all a waste of time and $$$ (consumer end). Each little incremental change for a mear 5%-(maybe)10% increase in performance lately is getting ridiculous and only brings down the values of relatively new cards . Dont get me wrong , Iam all for new tech and increased performance ; but damn make it worth our while and hard earned cash to upgrade .
I liked it much better when we actually had to wait quite awhile for the next gen of cards with a bigger performance increase , then we actually had to something to look forward to . This every 4 months of new xxxx is getting kinda stupid .
When we actually see a nice 35-50% increase in performance with-in a single generation , then I'll probably upgrade my current Sli ; but not before . Just my opinion .
Last edited:
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2007
Intel is coming out with a standalone graphics card that's supposed to give Nvidia and ATI a run for their money..
http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/18/intel-details-the-larrabee-next-gen-hybrid-cpu-gpu/
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2007
- Location
- Chicago, IL
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2007
- Location
- Chicago, IL
Ditto ....Man , how many so-called NEW versions of of v/cards do we need out at one given time
Each little incremental change for a mear 5%-(maybe)10% increase in performance lately is getting ridiculous and only brings down the values of relatively new cards . Dont get me wrong , Iam all for new tech and increased performance ; but damn make it worth our while and hard earned cash to upgrade .
I liked it much better when we actually had to wait quite awhile for the next gen of cards with a bigger performance increase , then we actually had to something to look forward to . This every 4 months of new xxxx is getting kinda stupid .
When we actually see a nice 35-50% increase in performance with-in a single generation , then I'll probably upgrade my current Sli ; but not before . Just my opinion .
100% agreed
Similar threads
