Notices

Overclockers Forums > Hardware > Video Cards > nVidia GPUs
nVidia GPUs
Forum Jump

Nvidia Stress Test Tool / Temp Monitor

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe Search this Thread
 
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-03-10, 07:19 PM Thread Starter   #1
ciku
Member

 
ciku's Avatar 

Join Date: Jan 2004

 
Nvidia Stress Test Tool / Temp Monitor


I have been using Gpu-z for monitoring temps/fan speeds and using atitool to stress test my card... I noticed atitool is buggy with win 7, I don't see its temp monitor working. Is there any other software that I can use to do both? also tried using rthdribl. But I'm wondering if there is anything else out there...

__________________

Intel i7-3770K [4.3ghz/Auto] | VisionTek HD 7970 [1050/1500/Auto] | Crucial M4 256gb | G. Skill Ares 16gb DDR3-1866
Msi Z77A-GD65 | Corsair H100i Push/Pull | Creative SB X-Fi Titanium HD | Corsair AX750 | Corsair Obsidian 650D | Win 7 Ultimate x64

[Heatware]

ciku is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 02-03-10, 07:22 PM   #2
EarthDog
Senior PITA Member
Overclockers.com Editor


 
EarthDog's Avatar 

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Stuck in Maryland...

 
Furmark.

http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/fur/

EDIT: Just noticed you wanted both...that wont do it. But just use seperates.

__________________

"We have more information and more ways of accessing it than ever, yet seem increasingly less inclined to do so."- Michael Wilbon

Last edited by EarthDog; 02-03-10 at 07:32 PM.
EarthDog is offline Author Profile Benching Profile Folding Profile Heatware Profile   QUOTE Thanks
Old 02-03-10, 07:26 PM   #3
Tw34k
Registered

 
Tw34k's Avatar 

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Jax Fl

 
I recently tried out the evga software precision and so far i like it.. only been 2 days tho.

edit .. nvm u wanted control and stress test in one..

__________________
Daily Desktop MSI 870A-G54,Phenom II 555 Black 4.0, 4 Gb G-Skill DDR3 1600,ATI 5950,650W Psu,
Mouse - G5 | KB - Razor Reclusa <3
Tw34k is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 02-03-10, 07:40 PM Thread Starter   #4
ciku
Member

 
ciku's Avatar 

Join Date: Jan 2004

 
well not really necessary 2 in 1 but is gpu-z pretty accurate? i'm remember using furmark awhile ago, name is very familiar but will try both ty guys.

EDIT: Btw, furmark is not dangerous right? in the sense that it will burn my card? if I leave it running for awhile?

__________________

Intel i7-3770K [4.3ghz/Auto] | VisionTek HD 7970 [1050/1500/Auto] | Crucial M4 256gb | G. Skill Ares 16gb DDR3-1866
Msi Z77A-GD65 | Corsair H100i Push/Pull | Creative SB X-Fi Titanium HD | Corsair AX750 | Corsair Obsidian 650D | Win 7 Ultimate x64

[Heatware]

ciku is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 02-03-10, 07:48 PM Thread Starter   #5
ciku
Member

 
ciku's Avatar 

Join Date: Jan 2004

 
Ok, I ran furmark at 1920x1200 in about 2mins... my gpu temp was 80c... I didn't feel like continuing, might burn my card... is it ok to continue?

EDIT: oh yeah, I click the Xtreme Burning Mode box....

__________________

Intel i7-3770K [4.3ghz/Auto] | VisionTek HD 7970 [1050/1500/Auto] | Crucial M4 256gb | G. Skill Ares 16gb DDR3-1866
Msi Z77A-GD65 | Corsair H100i Push/Pull | Creative SB X-Fi Titanium HD | Corsair AX750 | Corsair Obsidian 650D | Win 7 Ultimate x64

[Heatware]

ciku is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 02-03-10, 07:55 PM   #6
Stvwndr219e
Member



Join Date: Feb 2004

 
Furmark absolutely destroys cards!!! I would be careful running it for a long time. Wouldn't playing Crysis for about an hour count as stable?

Unless you're folding, absolute stability isn't really necessary as most games don't take full advantage of video cards. For me, as long as it's stable with the games I like to play, it's good enough for me.

__________________
Intel Xeon W3520 3848A352 @ 4.2 Ghz, 21x200
ATI Radeon 4870x2
ASUS P6T6 Workstation Revolution
3x2GB DDR3-2000 9-9-9-24
6TB Storage (2x1TB WD Black, 2x 2TB WD Green)
LG Blu-Ray Reader
Corsair HX1000
Stvwndr219e is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 02-03-10, 07:59 PM   #7
EarthDog
Senior PITA Member
Overclockers.com Editor


 
EarthDog's Avatar 

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Stuck in Maryland...

 
Agreed. But who wants to wait an hour to see? Not me. Furmark is quick and dirty to see if an o/c is stable (like Linx/Linpack/IBT for CPU's).

Quote:
Originally Posted by ciku View Post
Ok, I ran furmark at 1920x1200 in about 2mins... my gpu temp was 80c... I didn't feel like continuing, might burn my card... is it ok to continue?

EDIT: oh yeah, I click the Xtreme Burning Mode box....
Keep her around or under 80C and youwill be fine.


I run it 640x480 windowed with full AA on and play with clocks.

__________________

"We have more information and more ways of accessing it than ever, yet seem increasingly less inclined to do so."- Michael Wilbon
EarthDog is offline Author Profile Benching Profile Folding Profile Heatware Profile   QUOTE Thanks
Old 02-04-10, 09:02 AM   #8
baris_
Member



Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: The Netherlands

 
Quote:
Originally Posted by EarthDog View Post
Agreed. But who wants to wait an hour to see? Not me. Furmark is quick and dirty to see if an o/c is stable (like Linx/Linpack/IBT for CPU's).

Keep her around or under 80C and youwill be fine.


I run it 640x480 windowed with full AA on and play with clocks.
640x480? But won't that be a difference if you then, after it, start playing a high-end game on 1920x1080 or whatever it is that you play at?

__________________
Case: Antec 1200
Motherboard: Gigabyte EP45-UD3LR
Processor: Intel Core Q9550 @ 4,01GHz [1.344v] [Load: 66°]
Cooler: Cooler Master Hyper 212+
Memory: Transcend 2x1GB DDR2 944MHz @ 5-5-5-16
Graphics Card: ASUS ATI Radeon HD5850 @ 1009/1225 [1.225v] [Load: 59°]
Harddrive: Samsung SpinPoint F3 500GB
Power Supply: Cooler Master Real Power 620W
Soundcard: Creative X-Fi Xtreme Gamer 7.1
Monitor: Samsung SyncMaster 23" 1920x1080
baris_ is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 02-04-10, 09:05 AM   #9
EarthDog
Senior PITA Member
Overclockers.com Editor


 
EarthDog's Avatar 

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Stuck in Maryland...

 
I suppose it could. But in my experience if it can pass Furmark Stress test at those settings for an hour, I have had no trouble in games at my native res for hours on end, ever. Another way to do it is to loop the Crysis bench for hours....

__________________

"We have more information and more ways of accessing it than ever, yet seem increasingly less inclined to do so."- Michael Wilbon
EarthDog is offline Author Profile Benching Profile Folding Profile Heatware Profile   QUOTE Thanks
Old 02-04-10, 09:36 AM   #10
baris_
Member



Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: The Netherlands

 
Quote:
Originally Posted by EarthDog View Post
Another way to do it is to loop the Crysis bench for hours....
Or just the heaviest game one plays?

__________________
Case: Antec 1200
Motherboard: Gigabyte EP45-UD3LR
Processor: Intel Core Q9550 @ 4,01GHz [1.344v] [Load: 66°]
Cooler: Cooler Master Hyper 212+
Memory: Transcend 2x1GB DDR2 944MHz @ 5-5-5-16
Graphics Card: ASUS ATI Radeon HD5850 @ 1009/1225 [1.225v] [Load: 59°]
Harddrive: Samsung SpinPoint F3 500GB
Power Supply: Cooler Master Real Power 620W
Soundcard: Creative X-Fi Xtreme Gamer 7.1
Monitor: Samsung SyncMaster 23" 1920x1080
baris_ is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 02-04-10, 09:44 AM   #11
EarthDog
Senior PITA Member
Overclockers.com Editor


 
EarthDog's Avatar 

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Stuck in Maryland...

 
But what if that is CS:S? I can draw by hand that game...

Best to use the most stressful tool around for at least quick a dirty stability testing. Liek I said, it hasnt bitten me in the arse, as I have been doing it that way for a couple years now, but thats not to say it cant/wont.

__________________

"We have more information and more ways of accessing it than ever, yet seem increasingly less inclined to do so."- Michael Wilbon
EarthDog is offline Author Profile Benching Profile Folding Profile Heatware Profile   QUOTE Thanks
Old 02-04-10, 09:46 AM   #12
killem2
Member

 
killem2's Avatar 

Join Date: Jan 2005

 
I don't trust furmark anymore.

I would use something like vantage, 3dmark 06, dirt 2 demo benchmark, that one dragon benchmark (forgot the name)
killem2 is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 02-04-10, 09:47 AM   #13
EarthDog
Senior PITA Member
Overclockers.com Editor


 
EarthDog's Avatar 

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Stuck in Maryland...

 
Why not? You would be the first person I have seen say that.

__________________

"We have more information and more ways of accessing it than ever, yet seem increasingly less inclined to do so."- Michael Wilbon
EarthDog is offline Author Profile Benching Profile Folding Profile Heatware Profile   QUOTE Thanks
Old 02-04-10, 09:52 AM   #14
killem2
Member

 
killem2's Avatar 

Join Date: Jan 2005

 
Quote:
Originally Posted by EarthDog View Post
Why not? You would be the first person I have seen say that.
Well I found it odd when I would use furmark for my oc, it would I assume pass because I saw no screen mess ups no artifacts ect, but when I got to run vantage or dirt 2 demo, or even the dragon benchmark it crashes and can't make it.

If furmark can stress it more than any game or benchmark could hope too, I don't understand why it couldn't pass those.
killem2 is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 02-04-10, 10:08 AM   #15
EarthDog
Senior PITA Member
Overclockers.com Editor


 
EarthDog's Avatar 

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Stuck in Maryland...

 
That is odd. Like I said, I have never experienced that before. I would show artifacts, or it would freeze. If I could run furmark for an hour, I wouldnt hose on any game.

__________________

"We have more information and more ways of accessing it than ever, yet seem increasingly less inclined to do so."- Michael Wilbon
EarthDog is offline Author Profile Benching Profile Folding Profile Heatware Profile   QUOTE Thanks
Old 02-04-10, 10:17 AM   #16
killem2
Member

 
killem2's Avatar 

Join Date: Jan 2005

 
Well I'll give it another shot after a fresh isntall. I've been having a hard time getting rid of some nv drivers even with driver sweepering.
killem2 is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 02-04-10, 10:20 AM   #17
EarthDog
Senior PITA Member
Overclockers.com Editor


 
EarthDog's Avatar 

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Stuck in Maryland...

 
As always... YMMV. Just b/c lil ole me hasnt seen it doesnt mean it doesnt happen. I would be interested to hear your results after the fresh install.

__________________

"We have more information and more ways of accessing it than ever, yet seem increasingly less inclined to do so."- Michael Wilbon
EarthDog is offline Author Profile Benching Profile Folding Profile Heatware Profile   QUOTE Thanks
Old 02-04-10, 10:25 AM   #18
baris_
Member



Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: The Netherlands

 
Hmm, btw: is there also a difference between 37" 1920x1080 and 23" 1920x1080?

If so, what is the best screensize to run a resolution at?

__________________
Case: Antec 1200
Motherboard: Gigabyte EP45-UD3LR
Processor: Intel Core Q9550 @ 4,01GHz [1.344v] [Load: 66°]
Cooler: Cooler Master Hyper 212+
Memory: Transcend 2x1GB DDR2 944MHz @ 5-5-5-16
Graphics Card: ASUS ATI Radeon HD5850 @ 1009/1225 [1.225v] [Load: 59°]
Harddrive: Samsung SpinPoint F3 500GB
Power Supply: Cooler Master Real Power 620W
Soundcard: Creative X-Fi Xtreme Gamer 7.1
Monitor: Samsung SyncMaster 23" 1920x1080
baris_ is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 02-04-10, 10:28 AM   #19
EarthDog
Senior PITA Member
Overclockers.com Editor


 
EarthDog's Avatar 

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Stuck in Maryland...

 
About 14"..... hehe!

Usually the smaller the screen with the highest resolution I tend to like. But what you are compating above is a TV vs a Monitor.

__________________

"We have more information and more ways of accessing it than ever, yet seem increasingly less inclined to do so."- Michael Wilbon
EarthDog is offline Author Profile Benching Profile Folding Profile Heatware Profile   QUOTE Thanks
Old 02-04-10, 11:01 AM   #20
baris_
Member



Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: The Netherlands

 
Quote:
Originally Posted by EarthDog View Post
About 14"..... hehe!

Usually the smaller the screen with the highest resolution I tend to like. But what you are compating above is a TV vs a Monitor.
I'm a wee bit confused. Because at 22" 1920x1080 is possible. Which is also the case on 30" monitors. Isn't that very stretched out?

__________________
Case: Antec 1200
Motherboard: Gigabyte EP45-UD3LR
Processor: Intel Core Q9550 @ 4,01GHz [1.344v] [Load: 66°]
Cooler: Cooler Master Hyper 212+
Memory: Transcend 2x1GB DDR2 944MHz @ 5-5-5-16
Graphics Card: ASUS ATI Radeon HD5850 @ 1009/1225 [1.225v] [Load: 59°]
Harddrive: Samsung SpinPoint F3 500GB
Power Supply: Cooler Master Real Power 620W
Soundcard: Creative X-Fi Xtreme Gamer 7.1
Monitor: Samsung SyncMaster 23" 1920x1080
baris_ is offline   QUOTE Thanks

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe


Overclockers Forums > Hardware > Video Cards > nVidia GPUs
nVidia GPUs
Forum Jump

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Mobile Skin
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:19 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
You can add these icons by updating your profile information to include your Heatware ID, Benching Profile ID or your Folding/SETI profile ID. Edit your profile!
X

Welcome to Overclockers.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

New members like you have made this the best community on the Internet since 1998!


(4 digit year)

Why Join Us?

  • Share experience
  • Max out your hardware
  • Best forum members anywhere
  • Customized forum experience

Already a member?