Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
Anyone else getting tired of 1920 x 1200?
It may be more pixels but whats the pixel pitch/size of the pixels vs 24"... and 1920x1200? I would imagine it to be more but... to ensure your line of thinking is true you should do some math on that...as I dont think its just as easy as slapping that number you came up with on it. There are 56% more pixels is a fact though, but 56% more sharpness and clarity...................2560 x 1600 is about 56% more pixels on any given screen than 1920 x 1200
a 56% improvement in picture sharpness and clarity is an amazing improvement.
Dual 480's should be able to keep most games running at 30 FPS i would hope.
dot pitch is about the same on that dell 30" 2560, vrses the dell 24" 1920 Ultra I am using now
so if i get 56% further away from it
I just know though there is a difference in crysis say between 1920 x 1200 and less resolutions say 1600 x 900 or whatever... so would I not see similar improvements going from 1920x1200 to 2560x1600???
I'd say stick to the screen size you have, and just get a higher rez. I didn't believe it until i got my new iPod and put it next to an iPhone 3G, but 4 times the pixels is a TON. It's amazingly sharp, but it's the same size screen.
2560x1600 would probably be the best you could get around that size. The market for extremely high res screens is low right now because we don't have the GPU power openly available to drive that many pixels... yet.
It may be more pixels but whats the pixel pitch/size of the pixels vs 24"... and 1920x1200? I would imagine it to be more but... to ensure your line of thinking is true you should do some math on that...as I dont think its just as easy as slapping that number you came up with on it. There are 56% more pixels is a fact though, but 56% more sharpness and clarity...................
For example, Same monitors and all a 23" @ 1920x1080 will have smaller pixels than a 25" @ 1920x1080.