As the title says, strictly for gaming and a $150 budget BUT I would prefer a 24'' can someone recommend best for $100ish, best for $150ish and best for $200ish and the differences and why or why not to spend or not to spend more or less. Im more of a bang for my buck kind of guy so keep that in mind.
-
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
24'' Gaming monitor $150 max
- Thread starter eluminx
- Start date
- Thread Starter
- #3
What about these monitors?
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824009255
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824009245
The good and the bad?
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824009255
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824009245
The good and the bad?
- Joined
- May 29, 2005
I've heard good things about Acer screens, there is also an Asus 24'' that a lot of people have recommended that I have seen. I'll see if I can find the link for you.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824236049
It's just under $200 for the screen which is above your price range, I've seen it go on sale before but it isn't right now.
Here's an LED
http://www.buy.com/prod/asus-vh238h...d-monitor-w-speakers/q/loc/101/219608021.html
For $165. It has built in speakers but those obviously don't need to be used.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824236049
It's just under $200 for the screen which is above your price range, I've seen it go on sale before but it isn't right now.
Here's an LED
http://www.buy.com/prod/asus-vh238h...d-monitor-w-speakers/q/loc/101/219608021.html
For $165. It has built in speakers but those obviously don't need to be used.
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2002
1920*1080 runs pretty nice on a gtx 460. Ive got a pair of those(havnt used since i got the 2nd card) and I run SC2 at 1080p on high no problems. Im expecting that with the addition of my 2nd card ultra will be playable @ 1080p on the 460s.
monitor size has nothing to do with videocard performance. Pixels are pixels, so 1920x1080 is the same regardless of it being a 7" or 70" monitor.
Note. my definition of playable is never dropping below 50 FPS
monitor size has nothing to do with videocard performance. Pixels are pixels, so 1920x1080 is the same regardless of it being a 7" or 70" monitor.
Note. my definition of playable is never dropping below 50 FPS
- Thread Starter
- #7
Hmm I didnt know that..thats good to know. Thanks for the response.
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2011
my hanns g 25 inch has been great it was 170 but this 23.6 inch hanns g is only 139 it does have a 5ms response time though weird because mine has 2ms and they look identical besides size
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824254056&Tpk=hanns g
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824254056&Tpk=hanns g
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2001
- Location
- Las Vegas, NV
Hannsg is slowly gaining a good reputation as a budget solution. At your price point you're going to have to be flexible. 
Similar threads
