Notices

Overclockers Forums > Hardware > Display and Sound Technology > Displays and Digital Cameras
Displays and Digital Cameras Monitors, Digital Cameras, etc.
Forum Jump

Display Port

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe Search this Thread
 
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-16-12, 07:39 PM Thread Starter   #1
iTech
Registered



Join Date: Mar 2012

 
Display Port


Can someone tell me what the difference between Display Port and HDMI, the advantages and disadvantages? Thank you much.
iTech is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 03-16-12, 08:45 PM   #2
Sentential
Contributing Member

 
Sentential's Avatar 

Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Midland, Texas

 
http://en.community.dell.com/dell-bl.../19/46464.aspx

Quote:
Lots of customers I talk to are interested in understanding the differences between DisplayPort and HDMI display interfaces. Recently, I saw a PC World article from Tom Mainelli where he questioned the benefits of DisplayPort compared to HDMI. That's why I wanted to take some time to share Dell's perspective on this. In our view, both interfaces will be increasingly important for PC users and will coexist to meet different product applications.

HDMI is intended as an external consumer electronics connection for HDTVs. It is rapidly replacing S-Video and component video as the primary connection to TV sets. HDMI appears on consumer monitors so that they can be connected to Blu-ray Disc players, game consoles, and other consumer electronics. This allows the monitor to be used as an entertainment display. HDMI is also found on PCs to enable connectivity to HDTVs.

In contrast, DisplayPort is the digital interface for connecting flat-panel displays to computer systems. It will eventually replace VGA, DVI, and LVDS in IT equipment such as home and office PCs, projectors, monitors, and data center consoles. HDMI is not designed to meet these internal and external IT connectivity requirements...it is an external consumer electronics interface.

HDMI is based on legacy CRT raster-scan architecture. DisplayPort is designed for modern flat-panel displays and PC chipsets. DisplayPort has a micro-packet architecture with low voltage signaling that more easily enables networked displays. In the future, DisplayPort will also allow daisy chaining displays at full graphics performance, including 3D. and content protection. Today's USB-based daisy-chaining solutions do not support high performance 3D graphics or protected content.

HDMI has rules for how to implement and use the technology. Business and enterprise customers may not want to implement all of the consumer electronics features that are required in HDMI products. In contrast, DisplayPort is the display equivalent of Ethernet....anyone can implement it in any type of application. A VESA compliance program ensures interoperability for products featuring the "DisplayPort Certified" logo.

DisplayPort supports higher performance as a standard feature-every 6-foot cable supports 10.8 Gbps. With HDMI, high performance is optional and comes at a significant cost premium. DisplayPort has better support for projectors and enables cool ultra-thin monitors. It supports native fiber optic cable and offers latching connectors, features that are missing from HDMI. Down the road, DisplayPort will allow multi-function monitors with a single cable delivering display, audio, and USB connectivity. It will also support multiple monitors on a single connector.

I know there's more to be said on this topic, and we plan to blog more about it in the future. If you have any questions, concerns or comments please let us know here.
Sentential is offline Heatware Profile   QUOTE Thanks
Old 03-16-12, 09:06 PM Thread Starter   #3
iTech
Registered



Join Date: Mar 2012

 
Very helpful, thank you Sentential!
iTech is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 03-22-12, 11:26 AM   #4
Turcoloco
New Member



Join Date: Mar 2012

 
From recent personal experience, I can honestly say, at high resolutions (above the 1920x1200 setting), the visible difference between DVI and DisplayPort is undeniable.

I didn't think DisplayPort actually "unlocked" any really high resolutions that were hidden using the DVI connection until I have tested it on a Dell Laptop using a docking station and Dell Ultra Sharp monitor where both pieces had DisplayPort connections and using the DisplayPort cable, Windows display control panel listed resolutions that were much higher than 1920x1200!

Even at 1920x1200, the images and text looked much clearer using DisplayPort connection. This may have a lot to do with using compatible, high-end hardware that supports this connection.

PC: Dell XPS 8300 w/ 64-bit Windows 7 Ultimate Edition (stock Video card).
Monitor: Dell UltraSharp U2711 27-inch Widescreen Flat Panel Monitor - Max Resolution 2560 x 1440 (WQHD)
Docking Station: E/Port Plus 210W Port Replicator for Select Dell Latitude Laptops (R537F)

So, depending on your hardware and settings, using DisplayPort could make a huge difference.
Turcoloco is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 03-22-12, 01:32 PM   #5
hajalie24
Member



Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Michigan

 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turcoloco View Post
From recent personal experience, I can honestly say, at high resolutions (above the 1920x1200 setting), the visible difference between DVI and DisplayPort is undeniable.

I didn't think DisplayPort actually "unlocked" any really high resolutions that were hidden using the DVI connection until I have tested it on a Dell Laptop using a docking station and Dell Ultra Sharp monitor where both pieces had DisplayPort connections and using the DisplayPort cable, Windows display control panel listed resolutions that were much higher than 1920x1200!

Even at 1920x1200, the images and text looked much clearer using DisplayPort connection. This may have a lot to do with using compatible, high-end hardware that supports this connection.

PC: Dell XPS 8300 w/ 64-bit Windows 7 Ultimate Edition (stock Video card).
Monitor: Dell UltraSharp U2711 27-inch Widescreen Flat Panel Monitor - Max Resolution 2560 x 1440 (WQHD)
Docking Station: E/Port Plus 210W Port Replicator for Select Dell Latitude Laptops (R537F)

So, depending on your hardware and settings, using DisplayPort could make a huge difference.
You shouldn't notice much of a difference if you used a dual link dvi cable.

__________________
NZXT Tempest Case
Intel DP67BG Mobo with Intel Core i5 2500k @ 4.7ghz
12GB DDR3 1333
128 Crucial M4 SSD
750gb Samsung Spinpoint Sata Hard Drive
750gb Western Digital Sata Hard Drive
2x 2TB Samsung F3 Hard Drives
2x MSI R7870 Hawk In Crossfire
27" 2560x1440 Shimian Monitor plus 2x 21.5" AOC e2243fw 1080p
Logitech G15 Keyboard
Logitech G5 Mouse
HEAT
hajalie24 is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 03-22-12, 06:13 PM   #6
Turcoloco
New Member



Join Date: Mar 2012

 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hajalie24 View Post
You shouldn't notice much of a difference if you used a dual link dvi cable.
You might be correct but since we only had the common single-link DVI-D cables and each new monitor came with a DisplayPort cable not to mention two new 6' dual-link DVI cables would cost like $60 more, DisplayPort cable was the winner by default!
Turcoloco is offline   QUOTE Thanks

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe


Overclockers Forums > Hardware > Display and Sound Technology > Displays and Digital Cameras
Displays and Digital Cameras Monitors, Digital Cameras, etc.
Forum Jump

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Mobile Skin
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:55 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
You can add these icons by updating your profile information to include your Heatware ID, Benching Profile ID or your Folding/SETI profile ID. Edit your profile!
X

Welcome to Overclockers.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

New members like you have made this the best community on the Internet since 1998!


(4 digit year)

Why Join Us?

  • Share experience
  • Max out your hardware
  • Best forum members anywhere
  • Customized forum experience

Already a member?