My OC record with Amd Fx 8120

hello lads..
ive come to make a stabile 4,9ghz clock with my Amd FX 8120BE and frankly im quite proud tho i would like to listen what the rest of you have made of insane clocks perhaps?

Congrats very nice overclock !

thx alot! tho im quite afraid of the voltage but no fire yet lol!

SWEET!!!!!


PLEASE.. post the full load,max temp money shot.............

caddi daddi said:

SWEET!!!!!


PLEASE.. post the full load,max temp money shot.............

Click to expand...

The hwmonitor is the max and min of the clocks shown with the voltage aswell but i will post more later due to mobo watercool inc

CPU 54c Cores 42c?

That's a hell of a cooler you must have there, with those temps there should be more in it, those are like stock temps...

he sure has a cooler, i would love to see a pic of that cooling setup!!!!!
thos temps look like mine at 4.5ghz

actually my cooling isnt that good, it runs abit higher when gaming tho i havent been much up for gaming with it atm since im waiting for some more for my Watercooling loop and my Rad is only a 240 which could be much better , at 4,2ghz which is my "safehouse" i run about 37* at BF3 gaming which my Gfx and mobo is heating the water aswell where in prime or cpu bench the graphics card is almost inactive so at gaming it would rise a little more, however i look forward to increase my Rad(s) so that i can get it lower and even more stabile for funny things.. yet im trying to find a better solution for the massive voltage the "beast" eats

Nice, what kind of temps do you get on prime? Also do you have stock NB and HT and do you have the AMD patches? I got this at 4.2 GHz.

AMD FX-8120 Eight-Core @ 4.21GHz ( 4C / 8T )

x264 0.119.2106kMod 07efeb4
(libswscale 2.1.0)
(libavformat 53.17.0)
(ffmpegsource 2.16.2.1)
built by Komisar on Oct 23 2011, gcc: 4.4.7 20110720 (prerelease) (x86_64.generic.Komisar)
configuration: --bit-depth=8 --chroma-format=all
x264 license: GPL version 2 or later
libswscale/libavformat/ffmpegsource license: GPL version 2 or later

ffms [info]: 1920x1080p 1:1 @ 50/1 fps (vfr)

x264 [info]: using SAR=1/1

x264 [info]: using cpu capabilities: MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 FastShuffle SSE4.2 AVX XOP FMA4 SSEMisalign LZCNT

x264 [info]: profile High, level 4.2

x264 [info]: cabac=1 ref=3 deblock=1:0:0 analyse=0x3:0x113 me=hex subme=7 psy=1 fade_compensate=0.00 psy_rd=1.00:0.00 mixed_ref=1 me_range=16 chroma_me=1 trellis=1 8x8dct=1 cqm=0 deadzone=21,11 fast_pskip=1 chroma_qp_offset=-2 threads=12 sliced_threads=0 nr=0 decimate=1 interlaced=0 bluray_compat=0 constrained_intra=0 bframes=3 b_pyramid=2 b_adapt=1 b_bias=0 direct=1 weightb=1 open_gop=0 weightp=2 keyint=250 keyint_min=25 scenecut=40 intra_refresh=0 rc_lookahead=40 rc=crf mbtree=1 crf=23.0000 qcomp=0.60 qpmin=0 qpmax=69 qpstep=4 ip_ratio=1.40 aq=1:1.00

x264 [info]: started at Mon Apr 30 17:33:24 2012

x264 [info]: frame I:10 Avg QP:25.24 size:293382

x264 [info]: frame P:1242 Avg QP:28.43 size: 90347

x264 [info]: frame B:1248 Avg QP:31.32 size: 19908

x264 [info]: consecutive B-frames: 8.7% 66.6% 23.2% 1.6%

x264 [info]: mb I I16..4: 3.6% 76.6% 19.8%

x264 [info]: mb P I16..4: 0.1% 4.7% 0.8% P16..4: 38.2% 25.5% 16.0% 0.0% 0.0% skip:14.7%

x264 [info]: mb B I16..4: 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% B16..8: 48.1% 6.2% 1.9% direct: 4.2% skip:39.1% L0:36.0% L1:49.9% BI:14.1%

x264 [info]: 8x8 transform intra:83.2% inter:58.5%

x264 [info]: coded y,uvDC,uvAC intra: 90.8% 82.8% 56.9% inter: 30.4% 19.6% 4.0%

x264 [info]: i16 v,h,dc,p: 17% 37% 10% 36%

x264 [info]: i8 v,h,dc,ddl,ddr,vr,hd,vl,hu: 11% 25% 16% 5% 7% 6% 12% 6% 12%

x264 [info]: i4 v,h,dc,ddl,ddr,vr,hd,vl,hu: 15% 21% 13% 7% 8% 7% 11% 7% 11%

x264 [info]: i8c dc,h,v,p: 52% 26% 15% 7%

x264 [info]: Weighted P-Frames: Y:1.0% UV:0.1%

x264 [info]: ref P L0: 70.4% 21.7% 5.9% 2.0% 0.0%

x264 [info]: ref B L0: 90.8% 7.8% 1.4%

x264 [info]: ref B L1: 95.6% 4.4%

x264 [info]: kb/s:22398.42



encoded 2500 frames, 22.59 fps, 22398.42 kb/s


x264 [info]: ended at Mon Apr 30 17:35:15 2012

x264 [info]: encoding duration 0:01:51

Verification Code: 24E4323E351137491E2922232111365A5859651E3460635611113111251F232238396B11191125341120112945111A113E3E4923114444362337526465114444443624113752646544596657575D

actually this is a fresh install of Win7 ulti so im not 100% but agian this program seems broke since it calls a 8120 a 4c / 8t which is deff wrong when its a 8c/8t so ill try something else when i can

Thats just how some programs see bulldozer, I think it was that 8120 and 8150 had 4 physical cores but is actually considered to be like 8 core. I hope someone can explain what that was.

Heres a few pics of my rig with the "Cooling" excuse me for having a ugly fan but getting my Mobo Watercool tommorow and my Bridge gets liek 60* without fan T_T as seen i got my Rad in the top of my case with a 200mm bottom fan pushing through and 2 fans sucking through - having this in mind this is my low noise build max db is 19-21db (the clocking part is only for fun )

my isnt a bulldozer but a Zambezi and it is a 8core physical since the 8120 is worlds first and its 1thread per core only

Ravara said:

hello lads..
ive come to make a stabile 4,9ghz clock with my Amd FX 8120BE and frankly im quite proud tho i would like to listen what the rest of you have made of insane clocks perhaps?
View attachment 109259

Click to expand...

I actually didn't expect to beat you especially when you were at 4.9ghz

well as i described in another thread FHD cant see my 8 cores which makes performance worse.. i think its in 3dmark 11 my cpu really works well but it lacks physical next to a intel gamer.. and your running ivy brigde you maniac :O!

Nice OC you have here!

DK, comparing IB and FX doesn't really makes sense...

Ravara said:

well as i described in another thread FHD cant see my 8 cores which makes performance worse.. i think its in 3dmark 11 my cpu really works well but it lacks physical next to a intel gamer.. and your running ivy brigde you maniac :O!

Click to expand...

Thats why Had you been on 8 cores you would have manhandled me

manu2b said:

Nice OC you have here!

DK, comparing IB and FX doesn't really makes sense...

Click to expand...

I just ran the test out of curiosity.

well tbh Ivy brigde is lame in performance! but they do get quite hot but i believe ur cpu beats mine alot even by stock!

No 81XX has 4 physical cores, they just market it as 8 core. But it's hard to compare FX modules to cores. I think of it as 8 core, it's just different

Thats why it's reported as 4c in some programs, it should still work right.

http://www.overclockers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=703987

Don Karnage said:

I actually didn't expect to beat you especially when you were at 4.9ghz

Click to expand...

Damn, you beat me by one second I'm at 4.2 GHz.