• Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!

forget 1440 get 2160p!

Overclockers is supported by our readers. When you click a link to make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn More.
32" is a bad size. It's too big to sit right in front of at a desk, and it's too small (especially at that resolution) to sit several feet away from on a couch.
 
I'd take one of these in an instant. I like leaning back in my chair while reading text, so this would be perfect. It would also be helpful if you are working on Photoshop or like working from multiple windows. (Windows 8 need not apply lol) I'm sure the price will be more killer than the monitor.
 
A worse version of 2160p.

Interlaced scans only show half the picture on the screen at a time with the second half popping up 1/60 of a second later, whereas progressive scans show the whole picture at once which reduces visual flickering.
 
I was being facetious.

Calling any monitor p is unnecessary and wrong for that matter. No such thing as interlaced in PC talk. Just me being annoyed about 1080p and 1440p. It's a hold over from tv that's irrelevant in this context.
 
Railgun said:
I was being facetious.

Calling any monitor p is unnecessary and wrong for that matter. No such thing as interlaced in PC talk. Just me being annoyed about 1080p and 1440p. It's a hold over from tv that's irrelevant in this context.
Click to expand...

I couldn't agree with you more. I'd rather call those things WQXGA or QHD than a vertical and the scan method.
 
Railgun said:
I was being facetious.

Calling any monitor p is unnecessary and wrong for that matter. No such thing as interlaced in PC talk. Just me being annoyed about 1080p and 1440p. It's a hold over from tv that's irrelevant in this context.
Click to expand...

Errr, there was interlacing back in the day on PC's. So yes its PC talk but its very old PC talk at that. Basically CRT and very early editions of LCD's had this to watch out for. Most LCD's now are progressive scan models, especially high end monitors.
 
If there's a decently priced one that is between 22 and 27 inches, i might think about it. 32 inches is an awkward size
 
deathman20 said:
Errr, there was interlacing back in the day on PC's. So yes its PC talk but its very old PC talk at that. Basically CRT and very early editions of LCD's had this to watch out for. Most LCD's now are progressive scan models, especially high end monitors.
Click to expand...

Maybe cga, but nearly every single PC had and certainly today every one has progressive output.

CRT was still progressive. Don't confuse broadcast standards and how it was used with PC video displays.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Railgun
Samsung Odyssey Neo G95NC 57” ultra wide
Replies
5
Views
855
EarthDog
EarthDog
GreenSmoke
Please review my build - Gaming i5 13600k.
2
Replies
23
Views
2K
GreenSmoke
GreenSmoke
T
Ultrawide Monitor for Watching 4k MKV Files
Replies
3
Views
808
EarthDog
EarthDog
torin3
2K or 4K 27"?
Replies
3
Views
773
torin3
torin3
T
New config. advice
2
Replies
30
Views
736
shalena20
S
Back