Features


Overclockers Forum

Shopping Search



Top Products


Motherboards

Intel

Abit

Gigabyte

Asus

EPoX

Iwill

MSI

Shuttle

Tyan

Soyo


Processors

AMD

Intel

Compaq


Cases

Antec

ATX

Enlight


Graphic Cards

Leadtek

ATI

Creative Labs

Hercules

MSI

VisionTek

nVidia


Memory

SDRAM

RDRAM

DDRAM

DDR


Sound Cards

Creative Labs

Jaton

SIIG

SB Live

Guillemot


Hard Drives

Fujitsu

IBM

Maxtor

Quantum


Networking

Linksys Lan Cards

Ethernet Cards

FDDI Cards

Networking Kits


Misc.

Monitors

CD Roms/Burners

Printers

Scanners

Software

REVIEWS & TIPS
Over 1000 Topics

ACCESSORIES
ADAPTERS
BEGINNER GUIDES
BENCHMARKING
BIOS
BUYING ADVICE
BX COOLER
CASE COOLING
CASE REVIEWS
CONTESTS
CONTROLLERS
CPU REVIEWS AND TIPS
HARD DRIVES
HEATSINK REVWS AND TIPS
HUMAN INTEREST
MEMORY MISCELLANEOUS
MOTHERBOARD REVIEWS
OVERCLOCKING EXPERIENCES AND TIPS
PELTIERS
PROBLEM PRODUCTS
REPAIRS
SYSTEM COOLERS
SYSTEM REVIEWS
THERMAL GREASE
UTILITIES
VENDOR REVIEWS
VIDEO CARD COOLING AND PERFORMANCE
VIDEO CARD REVIEWS
WATER COOLING


Please read EMAIL FAQs first: Comments, suggestions, and questions to Joe Citarella, Skip MacWilliam, or Ed Stroligo

Pest Control? . . .
Ed Stroligo - 2/20/08


There's a device out there that is supposed to repel anybody under the age of about 25 out of an area with high-frequency sound waves. This is supposed to cause "pain and irritation" to the young, while older people with older ears can't hear it.

To be honest, my first thought was, "My God, don't let the Hillary Clinton for President people hear about this device!" :), but really, this is such a dehumanizing use of technology.

I suppose it's better than tear gas or tasers or rubber bullets, but in all those instances, aren't you supposed to do something bad first before you get that kind of treatment?

Apparently, any old store owner can buy one of these things and turn it on whenever he or she feels like it, (or just leave it on). Like some form of pest control.

I must admit, it is nondiscriminatory. It harasses everyone still hanging on to all their hairs in their inner ears, regardless of race, creed, color or behavior. The honor student gets treated exactly like the hooligan.

I don't know about you, but if I were hanging around with more than a little intent to raise hell, an irritant like this might give me a clue on who or what deserves the hell.

What is most disturbing, though, is not the device itself, but the attitude behind it: if we deem X group as being undesirable or annoying on general principle, we have the right to use technical means to drive you away.

I'm sorry, but this sounds a lot like the Klan for Kids.

It's not that I couldn't see a use for these things when rules are being broken, and I'm sure not every group of teens in a mall are stopping for an ice cream sundae on the way to Bible class.

But treating people like pests regardless of their behavior is no way to get better behavior.

A Suggestion

This is not the first time retailers have tried to use sound to keep teenagers away. However, at least they tried to do so by causing aesthetic rather than physical pain.

To me, this is far more acceptable and much less 1984-ish than pumping uncomfortable noise into sensitive young ears.

Ed


<< back to home