Table of Contents
Before starting here, take a little while to read Janus67’s excellent review of Battlefield 3 if you haven’t done so yet. This article is going to focus on performance. If you are considering making the leap to Battlefield 3, have a strong GPU and were curious about how your system would perform, you’re in luck. We have the scoop on several of today’s top cards.
Benchmarking Procedure
The most important part about benchmarking with games is that you have consistent, repeatable results so you can compare across multiple cards. The way we did this was to recruit forum members with very similar systems, running at the same CPU clock. RAM clocks varied from DDR3-1600 to DDR3-2133.
- i7 2600K @ 4.5 GHz (Removing any possible CPU bottleneck. Note one exception is the GTX570 result, which was run at 4.6 GHz.)
- DDR3-1600 to DDR3-2133 RAM
- {BYO GPU} running @ stock
- The game test should be run at 1920 x 1080 and using the “Ultra” setting, with all the defaults that applies when set.
The method of testing is manual, but is remarkably consistent (we’re talking less than 1 FPS difference between runs). Instructions:
- Turn on Fraps
- Start the first mission: Operation Semper Fidelis
- Begin recording FPS (F11 by default) after you pick up the pistol and are looking forward.
- Work through the level as normal.
- Stop recording FPS when you’re at the end of the level and the game takes over motion, hit F11 again when the guy puts his hands up.
- Repeat 3x at stock (the runs take approx 5 min each including the beginning cutscene).
- (Optional) If you feel ambitious, overclock your GPU to its stable 24/7 overclock and run it once.
The nature of this level makes it perfect for consistent and repeatable FPS results, which is why we decided to go with it. Plus it doesn’t require people to play far into the game. There is plenty of detail to stress the GPU. Of course, being enclosed this level will give slightly higher FPS than a massive 64 player online map. In my experience, on the larger maps you’ll lose anywhere between five and fifteen FPS compared to the numbers shown here, depending on the map and amount of action.
Most GPUs tested were run at stock and overclocked. The GPU overclocks featured in the graph are:
GPU | Overclock |
HD6970 – OC | 960 / 1375 |
HD6990 – OC | 960 / 1250 |
GTX480 – OC | 850 / 2150 |
GTX480 SLI – OC | 850 / 2150 |
GTX580 Tri-SLI – OC | 925 / 2300 |
When looking at the minimums, it seems AMD has a very slight edge with framerates not dropping quite as far relative to the averages. The HD6970 , GTX480 and GTX570 are roughly in the same ballpark. The GTX580 definitely shows its single-GPU muscle. Interestingly, the GTX480 SLI, GTX580 SLI and HD6990 results are all extremely close to each other; Crossfire (on a stick!) scales quite well.
Before moving on, huge thanks goes out to all of the fine gentlemen that took their time to run the tests. Only the HD6970 and HD6990 numbers came from me, the rest came from these kind individuals.
- turbohans – GTX465
- jiccman1965 – GTX480 and GTX480 SLI
- Owenator – GTX570
- EarthDog – GTX580
- MattNo5ss – GTX580 SLI
- MIAHALLEN – GTX580 Tri-SLI
Now, to get the most out of your setup regardless of GPU, both the red team and the green team have put out guides for just that. AMD’s ‘guide’ is short and to the point. NVIDIA’s is more comprehensive and covers pretty much everything.
Eyefinity Experience
This game offered the excuse we needed to grab a third monitor for eyefinity testing. This was the first time I had the opportunity to try this first hand and it is one intense experience. The hardware used was the same 2600K at 4.5 GHz and 8 GB of G.Skill Ripjaws X DDR3-2133 / 9-11-9-28 RAM. I tested with the AMD HD6990 by itself and with the HD6990 + 6970 in tri-fire.
One thing you should note is that three monitors takes up a LOT of space. My desk would be considered pretty large by any reasonable standard. I can put a bench setup for sub-zero LN2 benching next to a monitor, keyboard and mouse and have plenty of breathing room. When you put three monitors next to each other though, that takes up more space than you’d think. It’s totally worth it if you’re a gamer though, the experience is very impressive.
A question that came when this was posted on the forum was about the bezels. Honestly, you don’t even notice them. When you see photos and screenshots of Eyefinity it might seem like the large field of view would be used in its entirety – as in you’re looking left and right for enemies, etc. It’s nothing like that. While you can do that, if you try it you’ll end up dead very fast. Instead, all the side monitors are good for is true peripheral vision.
To survive and play well, you’ll be focusing straight ahead on the center monitor. The side monitors will serve as your peripheral vision. While it’s not a direct line of sight like you might think, playing like that definitely helps draw you into the game. Once you get used to it, you will notice those enemies eventually just as you would in real life with peripheral vision.
We have a few screenshots for you to see the field of vision available. These will open in a new window so you don’t get a lightbox from which there is no escape.
If you really want to see what it’s like, we have the full resolution screenshots for you. Click the links below to embiggen. Warning: They are almost or over a full meg each.
The biggest drawback to Eyefinity is that you will need a lot of horsepower to run such high resolutions. I didn’t even try running it on the HD6970 alone, but we do have numbers for the HD6990 and the HD6990 + HD6970 tri-fire combo.
A single HD6990 is barely enough to run the test level in Eyefinity at Ultra settings. It is decidedly not enough to run it on a huge 64-player map. If you can live with MSAA turned down/off or FXAA instead of MSAA, the rest of the Ultra settings should be playable. Adding the HD6970 to it made for smooth sailing through any map or number of players Battlefield 3 could throw at them on the full Ultra settings. Crossfire scaling is simply remarkable. Going from a stock HD6990 to the stock HD6990 + HD6970 in tri-fire gained 45%!
I won’t be running Eyefinity all the time. That would require purchasing a fourth monitor (one is for my test bed, two are for the main system, which actually makes graphing things in reviews pretty painless) and it’s not something I’d use often enough to warrant the purchase. But if I gamed as much as I used to and had the money to spare, you can bet I’d be all over an Eyefinity system. It is extreme immersion and with a knock-your-socks-off first person shooter like Battlefield 3, it doesn’t get much better.
– Jeremy Vaughan (hokiealumnus)
18 replies
Loading new replies...
Member
Registered
Water Cooled Moderator
Senior Member
Water Cooled Moderator
Senior Member
Senior Internet Fart
Benching Team Leader
Senior Internet Fart
Member
Join the full discussion at the Overclockers Forums →