• Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!

3dmark score for 9600xt

Overclockers is supported by our readers. When you click a link to make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn More.

StillLife

Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2002
Location
Phoenix
In my earlier post I was complaining about on getting 9400 in 3dmark01, well I ran 3dmark03 and got 3652, this are both at stock speeds for the cpu/gpu. I think this is a pretty good 3dmark03 score. Would you guys agree?

Also I think I read that 3dmark03 is a-lot less dependant on cpu/ram etc and tests just the gpu more, is this true?


I run a 1.7 p-4 willy with 512 of pc800..
 

ManOfKnight

Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2001
Location
Back in Iowa :( Come on Gators, Get up and Go!
i would expect your 3dmark01 to be a little higher...but your 3dmark03 is respectable for your card

SlipperyToy you have a Helluva lot faster computer than StillLife has...that explains your difference in 3dmark01 scores...and he was asking about his 3dmark03 scores...not his 01's
 

McTimson

Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2002
Location
[email protected] in New York
I got about 1100 in 01, and just about 4000 in 03 on an 2.1ghz AthlonXP with 640MB RAM at a 133FSB, with the card at stock speeds...so yea, your 03 score is alright, but your 01 could use some work...
 

pummer

Member
Joined
May 21, 2003
Location
buffalo ny
his 03's are good because 03 depends more on the card while 01 benchmarks more of the actual system.
 

Lancelot

Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2001
Location
the Netherlands
Those 3DMark01 numbers look pretty good to me for a Willy 1.7 system, they're prolly up that high cuz he has RDRAM. I had a 9500np that broke 14.000 in my main rig (see sig) but it barely brakes 6.000 in our Willy 1.7 SDRAM rig.
 

=ACID RAIN=

Member
Joined
May 19, 2003
Location
Kingwood, TX
I managed this in 03:
4348
Date: 2003-12-18
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) XP/MP/4 2429 MHz
GPU: ATI RADEON 9600 Series (9600XT)
549 MHz / 351 MHz
OS: Microsoft Windows XP
Res: [email protected] bit

and in 2001SE:
14167
Date: 2003-12-18
CPU: Unknown 2429 MHz
GPU: ATI RADEON 9600 Series
OS: Microsoft Windows XP
Res: 1024x768 32bit

The 9600XT has alot of potential, but you got to tweak the hell out of the memory as best you can since it has 4 pipelines.
 
OP
S

StillLife

Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2002
Location
Phoenix
Thanks for the info guys! I am not ready to OC the card yet. So I am happy with stock speeds and performance..
 

SpaceyWilly

Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2003
Location
Sturbridge, MA
Well there's no way I could pass up an opportunity to brag about my 3dmark scores:

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=1839533

Score: 4081

Date: 2004-01-04
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) Processor 2188 MHz
GPU: ATI RADEON 9600 Series
558 MHz / 336 MHz
OS: Microsoft Windows XP
Res: [email protected] bit

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7393441

Score: 13732

Date: 2003-12-31
CPU: Unknown 2313 MHz
GPU: ATI RADEON 9600 Series
OS: Microsoft Windows XP
Res: 1024x768 32bit

Im getting a new powersupply soon (my current one can hardly handle my setup with it's 300 no-name watts) so that should aid the effort a bit.