• Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!

FEATURED 3DMark TimeSpy released! Post up your scores!

Overclockers is supported by our readers. When you click a link to make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn More.
2289 - ||Console|| / 4670k 4.8 GHz / 950 gtx @ ACTUAL 1475 / Memory clock 1853 MHz
time.jpg
 
Last edited:
Follow the instructions in the first post. :)

You need to run the bench, have CPUz up showing the first tab and memory tab, as well as GPUz. You also need the proper formatting, or close. For example, your post on 12/30 was plenty close enough and I will put it up. :)

EDIT: Your second one, you need to get all the CPUz/GPUz shots in with the score.. one screenshot. Otherwise, things can be manipulated. Not saying you would do that of course, but, its more or less the rules from Hwbot.org where our benchmarking team competes is what we follow. :)

I am updating all scores now......

Console - you don't have the NAME / CPU / GPU jazz man!!! :)


Updated anything close! :)
 
Last edited:
EarthDog said:
Cores/threads matter here, absolutely. It doesn't matter quite as much as in the past (06, Vantage, 11... etc). I'll run quickly with and without.. To clarify, I mean its easier to catch up to a 8t from a 4t, but seemingly not the hex's+.
Click to expand...

Thanks Joe,
digging the XXXXX lovin

funny the GPU score went to the 4c4t slightly,

But big 1K advantage in CPU test gives up the big 200 point bump :thup:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Im.. uhh, going to have to remove that until tomorrow......... :chair::escape:
 
12852 - GoldieFoxx / i7 6700k 4.7 GHz / 2 x GTX 1080 (Zotac AMP! Extreme) @ 2050 MHz / Memory clock 1368 MHz

Cant quite hit 4.8 GHz without going to 1.45v or so which I dont really feel safe doing
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/17208107

Just got an HB SLI Bridge and got a few hundred points of improved score over my last test. :) Also just managed to push into the top 'similiar systems' bracket :p, so I think i've hit the performance roof without getting a titan or x99

GKYV2Pg.jpg
3Ruvj69.png
 

Attachments

  • JYnhhZ5.png
    JYnhhZ5.png
    291.5 KB · Views: 149
GoldieFoxx said:
Nice! What voltage did you go to to get 2.2 GHZ on the GPU?
Click to expand...

2202 @ 1.075v, 2214 @ 1.081v and 2227 / 2240 @ 1.093v. Just stock voltage. I did a run at 2252 @ 1.093v, but the score dropped off a tiny bit. Will try to get things a little cooler next weekend, maybe -5c and see if it'll run better there.

All these with ambient temps at 0.6c and coolant temps at between 2.1c and 2.7c.
 
4205 - idfka / Intel 2500K @ 4.3 GHz / RX 480 @ 1425 MHz / Memory clock 2250 MHz

Untitled.png
 
Last edited:
So, a little late to the party here.....

I can only get 160 bump on the core but the memory is at +500 on my 980ti. No voltage added yet. Keeping it cool seems to be the issue. Maybe a water block if I can find a deal on one.

Timespy.JPG
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

mackerel
RTX 2070 Gigabyte Windforce
2
Replies
30
Views
20K
Woomack
W
Johan45
FEATURED Marathon Season VII February: 3DMark 11 Performance
2 3
Replies
57
Views
12K
EarthDog
EarthDog
Johan45
FEATURED Post your Cinebench R20 scores here!
4 5 6 7 8
Replies
142
Views
30K
xxNAPxx
X
Johan45
FEATURED Marathon Season VI February: 3DMark 11 Performance
2 3
Replies
49
Views
14K
MetalRacer
MetalRacer
Johan45
FEATURED Marathon Season VI January: 3DMark 05
2 3 4 5 6
Replies
106
Views
26K
Mandrake4565
Mandrake4565
Back