- Joined
- May 15, 2010
- Location
- Euroland, Denmark
Hello guys,
A few select users have noticed that I am out with the big wallet and looking to spend.
Right from the start, my aim was 5820K, and honestly, it still is, but...
I have been looking threw a few CPU reviews now, and I am left with questions.
When looking at the gaming section of Toms hardware (http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-core-i7-5960x-haswell-e-cpu,3918-6.html) the 5820K is for the bigger part, giving better gaming results than the 5930K and 5960X. The review is just over a month old, but I still have questions on why this would be?
Looking at AnandTech, from the date, the results look a lot more as expected. (http://www.anandtech.com/show/8426/...view-core-i7-5960x-i7-5930k-i7-5820k-tested/6) The CPU's fall pretty much in range of where they should be according to specs.
Now jumping over to Bit-Tech (http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2014/09/03/intel-core-i7-5930k-and-core-i7-5820k-revie/7) we know start to see a patteren of identical scores.
I have not been able to find any more tests where both the 5820K and the 5930K both are represented, but I am left confused but they strange pattern of Good,bad and same..
My goal here is to justify that there really is not reason i should be looking at the 5930K, and maybe gaining a better understanding for the as to why the results are all over the map.
A few select users have noticed that I am out with the big wallet and looking to spend.
Right from the start, my aim was 5820K, and honestly, it still is, but...
I have been looking threw a few CPU reviews now, and I am left with questions.
When looking at the gaming section of Toms hardware (http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-core-i7-5960x-haswell-e-cpu,3918-6.html) the 5820K is for the bigger part, giving better gaming results than the 5930K and 5960X. The review is just over a month old, but I still have questions on why this would be?
Looking at AnandTech, from the date, the results look a lot more as expected. (http://www.anandtech.com/show/8426/...view-core-i7-5960x-i7-5930k-i7-5820k-tested/6) The CPU's fall pretty much in range of where they should be according to specs.
Now jumping over to Bit-Tech (http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2014/09/03/intel-core-i7-5930k-and-core-i7-5820k-revie/7) we know start to see a patteren of identical scores.
I have not been able to find any more tests where both the 5820K and the 5930K both are represented, but I am left confused but they strange pattern of Good,bad and same..
My goal here is to justify that there really is not reason i should be looking at the 5930K, and maybe gaining a better understanding for the as to why the results are all over the map.