- Joined
- Mar 19, 2003
- Location
- In front of my computer
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
Is it also smaller not only because of the process shrink, but also because of the removal of half the cache? or is it technically still there but disabled, or something?Pretty interesting how they got the die size down alot
Josebmw said:I think the oakville one is mobile, thus the lack of the heatspreader, it looks like a 3000+ from the numbers on the chip. Pretty interesting how they got the die size down alot, I'm hoping it will consume less than a 100 Watts.
dreammmatt said:Is it also smaller not only because of the process shrink, but also because of the removal of half the cache? or is it technically still there but disabled, or something?
dreammmatt said:In reference to this:
Is it also smaller not only because of the process shrink, but also because of the removal of half the cache? or is it technically still there but disabled, or something?
If it's supposed to be a mobile chip lets hope it uses less than 50 watts, not 100Josebmw said:I think the oakville one is mobile, I'm hoping it will consume less than a 100 Watts.
tomchong said:ok, were are the oc results?