- Joined
- Mar 7, 2008
In recent crunching usage I noticed my 980Ti thermally throttling. That's no unusual. It was running 160W at the time. That is unusual. I knew the thermals needed looking at. No excess dust on the fan/heatsink, so repaste it was. Opened it up, and I saw the old paste had significantly pumped out. I don't recall what paste it was, but I had done it in the past. On went MX-6 in its place. I cracked open a new tube. I've never used it before, and it is THICC. Maybe even needing a 3rd C. Attempts at spreading it didn't go well but got there in the end.
Then there were thermal pads. Many of them over the ram chips had degraded so far they were literally falling apart. The ones over VRM seemed in better condition. I got spare pads, I should replace them. Visually, the old pads seemed to be card original based on pictures elsewhere. But what thickness? Couldn't find a good answer online, so I tried to measure the old pads. Digital callipers said the ram pads were near enough 1mm so that seemed easy. The VRM pads were hitting about 1.3mm. Is that a standard size? I tried comparing it to the ram pads, but neither visually or by feel could I say they were that different. Maybe compression related? If I really squeeze the ram pads, they go to 0.9mm. Same on the VRM pads. So, are they the same or not? Measured my "new" pads, the 1mm ones were in tolerance of 1mm, with protective film still on. I decided to replace the ram ones, and reuse the VM ones which didn't disintegrate nearly as bad as the ram ones.
Reassembled and compared some before-after results. Using PrimeGrid GFN-17 project, obviously throttling before. Peak temps were about the same after, but no reported thermal throttling. Power usage was about 10% higher. It is better but this is still nowhere near applying 250W, and it is still on the edge of throttling even if not reaching it. I could leave it for now.
Thinking more, could both VRM and ram pads be 1.5mm, but the ram ones compressed more over time?
I got pics elsewhere I'll add later.
Then there were thermal pads. Many of them over the ram chips had degraded so far they were literally falling apart. The ones over VRM seemed in better condition. I got spare pads, I should replace them. Visually, the old pads seemed to be card original based on pictures elsewhere. But what thickness? Couldn't find a good answer online, so I tried to measure the old pads. Digital callipers said the ram pads were near enough 1mm so that seemed easy. The VRM pads were hitting about 1.3mm. Is that a standard size? I tried comparing it to the ram pads, but neither visually or by feel could I say they were that different. Maybe compression related? If I really squeeze the ram pads, they go to 0.9mm. Same on the VRM pads. So, are they the same or not? Measured my "new" pads, the 1mm ones were in tolerance of 1mm, with protective film still on. I decided to replace the ram ones, and reuse the VM ones which didn't disintegrate nearly as bad as the ram ones.
Reassembled and compared some before-after results. Using PrimeGrid GFN-17 project, obviously throttling before. Peak temps were about the same after, but no reported thermal throttling. Power usage was about 10% higher. It is better but this is still nowhere near applying 250W, and it is still on the edge of throttling even if not reaching it. I could leave it for now.
Thinking more, could both VRM and ram pads be 1.5mm, but the ram ones compressed more over time?
I got pics elsewhere I'll add later.