Is there any reason to purchase a Venice A64 3800+ processor over a San Diego 4000+ processor assuming there is virtually no price difference ($56 for Venice 3800+ or $60 for San Diego 4000+). Both would be brand new and would be installed on an ASRock Dual SATA-II mobo (because it has both PCI-e and AGP slots and IDE and uses my 184 pin ram). There is also the option of a Venice 3400+ at $40 but the only reason I can see going with that is if the 3400+ is easily overclockable to just as high a speed as the other two more expensive processors are.
I'd be doing a mild to moderate overclock on air cooling w/ existing components such as my 2GB Corsair, ATi X850XT AGP card, Silverstone Zeus 550W, two IDE (PATA) Hard drives, etc.
I'd be doing a mild to moderate overclock on air cooling w/ existing components such as my 2GB Corsair, ATi X850XT AGP card, Silverstone Zeus 550W, two IDE (PATA) Hard drives, etc.