- Joined
- Nov 24, 2001
- Location
- Dallas, Georgia
Shook said:Intel's new P4's 800mhz fsb with the new chipsets rock AMD's blind folded
Sad but true...sad but true..
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
Shook said:Intel's new P4's 800mhz fsb with the new chipsets rock AMD's blind folded
you said it silver.Silver said:
Sad but true...sad but true..
people started jumping ship when the northwood 1.6ghz came out, many have including myself and i dont hear to many people regreting it.clash said:I have never used anything but AMD chips ever since i got my first "compatible". I can now say, I am tired of having second best. In the day, it was hard to beat a AMD chip. How can AMD compete with a 800 FSB? It can't,plain and simple. I am jumping ship...
I won't miss it.
AZN said:
people started jumping ship when the northwood 1.6ghz came out, many have including myself and i dont hear to many people regreting it.
AZN said:
people started jumping ship when the northwood 1.6ghz came out, many have including myself and i dont hear to many people regreting it.
simple intel browsing would show u scores all over the place. but i got 6300 MBs with sandra.OC Noob said:AMD is all about price baby.
They weren't worth using until nforce2 boards started getting the new NB revisions and they are still buggy, but the rig in my sig (#1) is just as stable and faster then #2 when it was my primary and at 3 ghz.
I think you guys are being a little hard on the beaver.
Intel has the performance crown for sure, but AMD is the king of bang per buck.
ps how about some intel benchies with the new 400 mhz Dual DDR and 800 mhz FSB. I've been out of it for a while and would love to see how they perform. Thanks!
dustybyrd said:
1st, i'm definitely not an AMD fanboy...i've never even used one for more than 5 minutes...
2nd...for your duallie rigs...did you overclock either of them? i don't think tyan's can be overclocked...so what about the asus?
because if you didn't overclock the asus then 1.53 ghz on those 1800+'s is pretty slow...but add an additional 50% performance to that (raw speed and fsb increases) and how would it perform?
stability was worse....that's interesting....in what way was it worse?
i am really curious about all this...maybe i did the right thing building a dual p3 tualatin....
yes but they are so few and far between.PhobMX said:not all us amders are lamers...
what is this i see? is silver thinking of 800fsb tooSilver said:
Sad but true...sad but true..
OC Noob said:Joking aside I was checking out anands site and found this:
http://www.anandtech.com/cpu/showdoc.html?i=1818&p=1
Pitting a 3 ghz C P4 (on an 875) and a 1.8 ghz Opteron (single processor) and the opteron get beat on Content Creation Winstone 2003 and almost all encoding & 3drendering test. The Opteron wins all the rests.
Check it out. Its a good read.
That is wrong wrong wrong. They're comparing apples to oranges.. good read btw
dustybyrd said:
what do you mean?
that you can't make the comparison or that it is unfair because the opteron is for servers?
either way the comparison can be made...
AZN said:
what is this i see? is silver thinking of 800fsb too